Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
one of us |
I picked up some XMR 4064 today to try. How does it compare to IMR 4064? I don't see much XMR Data. Can I use IMR Data and work up or is XMR totaly different. Thanks | ||
|
one of us |
The Accurate Arms website should answer your questions, but from my last manuals they would seem pretty close, for example, 30-06 180 XMR4064 is 48.5 and from Sierra IMR4064 is 48.8. I use the 4350s interchangeably. | |||
|
one of us |
I have used the XMR 4064 first actually, but converted to the IMR version. However, load data seems to be pretty interchangable, just work up near max loads. I find the IMR version a little more pressure forgiving at max loads tho. However a good handloader should never be dancing in the gray of Max loads. YOU don't gain any thing in ratio to what the risks are. Cheers and Good shooting seafire | |||
|
one of us![]() |
Faster 150 W-748 *151 IMR-4064 152 Brigadier 4065 153 AA-2520 154 N-202 155 RL-15 156 AR-2208 157 N-140 158 R-903 159 S-341 160 TU-5000 161 Varget 162 BL-C(2) 163 N-540 164 Big Game 165 N-203 166 H-380 *167 AA-4064 168 R-907 Slower | |||
|
one of us![]() |
I've used a fair amount of XMR4064 in the 7-08 and 308, and have found it to be pretty darn close to the IMR version, maybe a grain slower, as Steve's chart represents. Its primary benefit, at least to me, is the smaller grain size seems to flow better through the powder measure. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia