THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Great .270 Winchester loads using Reloader 22
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
In the past I've used IMR and Hodgdon 4831 and IMR and Hodgdon 4350 in my .270 Winchester. These powders gave good accuracy, especially with 150 grain bullets, but I've never been able to get the velocities I'd like from them in my rifle, escpecially with 150 grain bullets -- I wanted to get 3000 f.p.s., but all I was able to get was about 100 f.p.s. less than that with the 4831s, and 200 f.p.s. less with the 4350s. My rifle is a Remington 700 Mountain Rifle with a 22 inch barrel. I had concluded that it has a slow barrel, and that I should be satisfied with those velocities.

But recently I began trying RL 22 powder in thie rifle, and I've been very pleasantly surprised. I got 3000+ f.p.s. with two different 150 grain bullets. Here are the loads:

150 grain Speer softpoint, moly coated (by me)
60.3 gr. RL 22
Winchester case, WLR primer
3.35 in. overall length
Crimped with Lee Factory Crimp Die
Velocities: 3042 to 3071 f.p.s.

150 grain Nosler Ballistic Tip, moly coated (by me)
60.3 gr. RL 22
Winchester Case, WLR primer
3.35 in. overall length
Crimped with Lee Factory Crimp Die
Velocity: 3030 f.p.s.
 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol` Joe
posted Hide Post
LE270, I be a bit leery with those loads. Nosler lists 56.5gr of R22 and Speer 54.0 under a 150gr bullet in their new manuals.
Noslers vel is 2902 from a 24" test bbl and Speer claims 2769 from a 22" Ruger.
I`m sure there is a "lawyer" factor figured in their data but 4-6grs over book with 100-300fps extra vel sounds a bit hot.

just MHO...............
 
Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ol` Joe:
LE270, I be a bit leery with those loads. Nosler lists 56.5gr of R22 and Speer 54.0 under a 150gr bullet in their new manuals.

Maybe the loads I gave are over the safety edge for some rifles.

In my rifle, although the loads I gave above are quite hot, they worked without signs of way too high pressures, such as primer flattening or heavy bolt lift.

In their Reloaders' Guide, Alliant lists a load of 59.5 gr of RL 22 with a 150 gr. Nosler bullet.

[ 07-19-2003, 07:54: Message edited by: LE270 ]
 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've talked with ballisticians from Nosler and Sierra who probably wouldn't put this in print, but say none the less that you need to look at three signs when determining pressure; brass flow, bolt lift and primer flatening or cratering, in that order. They both said looking at the primer is the least reliable indicator. Brass flow is the surest sign that you've gone above 70,000 psi, which they say is safe in a modern bolt action. If your bolt isn't tight, and you can't see brass flow, chances are you're safe.
 
Posts: 198 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 05 September 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I shoot a 270 a bunch--the 150 bullet with R22 is what I use for most all-am gonna give the 140 Accu a try this week though.

Anyway a lot of things are possible out there but from the rifles I've worked with 60 of 22 with a 150 would be punching primers and or freezing the bolt. Are you sure your scale is right? Have you tried this with more than one lot? Personaly it sounds way over the edge to me.

Just my thoughts

"GET TO THE HILL"

Dog
 
Posts: 879 | Location: Bozeman,Montana USA | Registered: 31 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Alaska Bush Man
posted Hide Post
The only thing I would change with this load is the Primer, seems all Reloader Powder loves Federal Gold Medal Match Primers......GM210M in the 270 Win.
 
Posts: 523 | Location: North Pole, Alaska | Registered: 26 January 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
You are way over max if that's a 22" or 24" barrel.

RL-22 is a great powder for the .270 but just because you think you "should" get 3000 fps doesn't mean you can do so safely. I don't see any of the manuals listing more than 2900 fps. Alliant does list 59.5 gr. but they only get 2845 fps, and presumably that's out of a tight-chambered pressure gun.

Also, you may not have traditional "signs" if you have a smooth chamber, locking lugs, etc. John Barsness had a piece in Handloader where he had several of his loads pressure-tested on modern equipment and found a .270 load he'd used for years was over 70,000 fps but had never given him a single sign of pressure.

Be careful out there!

John
 
Posts: 1246 | Location: Northern Virginia, USA | Registered: 02 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RSY
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by John Frazer:
a .270 load he'd used for years was over 70,000 fps

Now that's fast! Those new magnums ain't got nothing on the old .270!!! [Big Grin]

On a serious note, though, I would definitely be careful with RL-22 in the upper ranges. I've loaded it for my .270 for years, and it can get really unpredictable really quickly. Like any powder (and maybe more so), it WILL bite if backed into a corner.

RSY

[ 07-21-2003, 03:44: Message edited by: RSY ]
 
Posts: 785 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 01 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've been using RL-22 in the .270 for many years and anything over 58.5grs with a 150gr. bullet is pushing the limit.
 
Posts: 1018 | Location: Lafourche Parish, La. | Registered: 24 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Barnes 130 gr X bullet, 59 gr of RL22. Little bug size groups, 3000 fps velocity. - Dan
 
Posts: 5285 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 05 October 2001Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
quote:
You are way over max if that's a 22" or 24" barrel.

RL-22 is a great powder for the .270 but just because you think you "should" get 3000 fps doesn't mean you can do so safely. I don't see any of the manuals listing more than 2900 fps.

Here we go again! The above per John Frazer. He is right when he says just because you want 3000 fps doesn't mean you can get it safely. However, neither does it mean you can't!! Since all rifles are individuals, he cannot state that your load, in your rifle, is "Way over max", because he has no way of knowing this, any more than I do! YOU are the only one who can tell if this is true in your rifle, as you noted.

I have no experience shooting RE 22 in a .270. But I have used it in two long-throated 7X57mm's with 175-grain bullets, and have decided that it is NOT POSSIBLE to get too much RE 22 into any ordinary, standard 7X57mm case with any bullet, up to and including the 175 grainers, if your gun has a long throat. Using the Barnes 195 grain Original, it might be possible to get into trouble, but not with any lighter projectile!

Years ago, I used to use 59 grains of H4831 in my .270's with 150 grain Nosler Partition bullets. I didn't have a chronograph in those days, so have no idea what the muzzle velocity of that load was. It was a Jack O'Connor load, however. I later switched to IMR 4350, because it gave greater accuracy, and my two most accurate loads turned out to be 55.5 grains of IMR 4350 with the 130 grain and 53.5 grains of same with the 150 grain. This was in two 20" barrelled Mannlicher-Schoenauers with 1/9" twist rifling. The 130 grain load gave 2950, and the 150-grain load gave 2820. Not bad from a 20" tube, and certainly deadly on all game they were aimed at!

[ 07-21-2003, 19:41: Message edited by: eldeguello ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Why did you want to get 3000+ fps with a 150 in your 270?
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RSY:
quote:
Originally posted by John Frazer:
a .270 load he'd used for years was over 70,000 fps

Now that's fast! Those new magnums ain't got nothing on the old .270!!! [Big Grin]

On a serious note, though, I would definitely be careful with RL-22 in the upper ranges. I've loaded it for my .270 for years, and it can get really unpredictable really quickly. Like any powder (and maybe more so), it WILL bite if backed into a corner.

RSY

Whoops ... psi.
[Frown]

Back to my use of RL-22 -- the first time I tried it I got great accuracy with something like 58.5 gr. but always wondered about the bolt lift -- maybe just a tad sticky but hard to say in that rifle. I was also getting at least 2900 fps, don't have the notes handy. This with Hornady 150s.

I tried it again last year (new lot of bullets) and 56.5 gr. was the highest that looked safe. Got around 2800-2840 fps. Tried it this year with a new lot of powder and yet another lot of bullets and got the same velocity with 54.5 gr. All this from a 22" barrel.

I still maintain that if none of the bullet or powder companies are getting more than 2900 fps with maximum loads in a 24" pressure barrel (likely custom made for them to very close tolerances), I highly doubt you can get to 3000 safely in a 22" factory rifle. I suppose anything's possible but wouldn't count on it in this case.

I suppose the one exception might be some type of coated bullets, but then there might be a problem getting enough extra powder in the case.

John
 
Posts: 1246 | Location: Northern Virginia, USA | Registered: 02 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I use 58.5gr's of RL-22 and a 150gr Nosler all the time, does a little over 3000fps, and the pressure seems very mild in my M98.
 
Posts: 3097 | Location: Louisiana | Registered: 28 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The last 3 270's I've worked with have all done 3000 with the 150 and the 22" tube using R22.

"GET TO THE HILL"

Dog
 
Posts: 879 | Location: Bozeman,Montana USA | Registered: 31 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smallfry:
Why did you want to get 3000+ fps with a 150 in your 270?

Well, for one thing, the Hornady loading manual -- the 1977 version -- gives that velocity with 150 grain bullets, and 3200 with 130 grain ones. For another, I remember reading about people of that era getting 3000 f.p.s. with 150 grain bullets from 22 inch barrels in 270s.
 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
<brewtcl>
posted
This is kind of related since it was mentioned in this thread. What is "brass flow" when looking for pressure signs? Just curious. I might call it something different or it is possible I've never heard of it. Can some explain and give an example. Thanks
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
When the pressure gets too high, the brass will flow into the ejector slot cut into the bolt and show up as a mark on the case head. (where it says .270 Win etc.) These loads are probably fine, but I'd mike the case head and stop when expansion is over .001". Everyone's rifles are different. On another post several people said me and a couple of others were going to lose our eyes, etc. loading 7x57 140 gr Noslers to 3000 fps with 53.5 gr H414. If any of these people has a device that can determine a safe load from 800 miles away, I'd like to have one. I've shot enough of these myself to know better. I've also shot 60 gr RL22 in a .270 with 140 grain, but not 150's. some of the doubters need to take a dummy case load it up and check to see how much water it holds with a bullet seated, then seat it .080 farther out and see how much more it holds. The effect of a slightly longer throat is significant and is a large part of the difference between velocities from gun to gun. I also raced a few drag cars and constantly had some all-knowing individual tell me I was running too lean, etc. engine would grenade etc. without having all the information needed to make a proper decision. Reloading as in racing is in putting together a proper combination that works with the parts you have assembled, not theory, what someone else told you , or anything else. Work up loads by using pressure indicators, mostly a mike, just as with a race engine, the clock will tell you when things are right.
 
Posts: 2788 | Location: gallatin, mo usa | Registered: 10 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
For my 270 I get the folowing

57.5 gr and 130 NBT = 3110
56.5 gr and 140 HSBBT = 3000
56 gr and 150 NBT = 2930
55 gr and 160 NP = 2850

My rifle is tight - and any loads higher than this and the primer pockets loosen up - pushing a 150 gr 270 bullet over 3000 is pressing it - a 30-06 (same case) can't hardly do it(most don't) with a 150 gr bullet - which is technically easier. All primers are WLR and compared to SC4831, RL19 and 4350 RL22 is the most accurate and obtains the highest velocity.
 
Posts: 363 | Location: Madison Alabama | Registered: 31 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Also - 24" barrel
 
Posts: 363 | Location: Madison Alabama | Registered: 31 July 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia