THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
how do YOU work up a load for max accuracy?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
What methodology have you folks found to be the best way to go about load development? Especially the method that produces the best accuracy with the fewest rounds tested?

I've always shot groups of different loads, but I'm intrigued with the "incremental" method as described on the snipershide website.

Roger

 
Posts: 648 | Location: Huskerville | Registered: 22 December 2001Reply With Quote
<2ndaryexplosioneffect>
posted
Buy every powder know to man�all the brands of bullets in weights that will go down your barrel�load with 15 different primers�then use someone�s load you got off the internet!

OK, just kidding� give me some specifics and I�ll dazzle you with pearls of wisdom.

Shoot safe,
Mike

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've just been reading about the incremental method that you mention, and if the weather gods are kind, I might have a look at it this weekend.

The gist of it seems to be that you load, say, 10 rounds, stepping the load up by .3/.5 (depending upon the cartridge). You then shoot the 10, taking great care to ensure you keep track of which hole belongs to which load. You are looking for 3 or so sequential shots to cluster together. If it works out, then these loads that cluster together represent a point in the barrel harmonics at which it is most tolerant of slight differences in the loads. My guess would be that these are the 'end points' in the barrel vibration.

 
Posts: 121 | Location: Southern Australia | Registered: 13 December 2000Reply With Quote
<Dave King>
posted
I've been using this incremental as John Bartels states for many years.

I try to load 20 bullets with a 'step' value from the 'Starting' load to the 'Max' load. If the Start to Max is 10 grains, I have a step value of .5 grains. I generally use the same components for these loads, known accurate bullets, Match Primers, prepped brass. The only real variable is the powder and rifle.

I fire a few fouling rounds to 'condition/heat' the barrel as I use heavy barreled rifles and don't wait for a cold bore shot on development.

I fire all the 'test' rounds onto one target plotting the hits and velocity on a duplicate target I keep at the shooting position.

Once all rounds are fired I determine the range that gives the tightest group and the midpoint of that range becomes my desired load. I usually have an accurate load in just one trip to the range, on the next trip I establish velocity constants for ballistic trajectories with the selected load.

 
Reply With Quote
<RobertJ>
posted
Dave
At what range do you this type of load development? I have tried it a 100yd and was not able decipher the information.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of hivelosity
posted Hide Post
Roger this is a target from my load developement. all loads were the same except for the powder weight. shot at 100 yards

sorry could not get the picture to post.

[This message has been edited by HIVELOSITY (edited 01-31-2002).]

[This message has been edited by HIVELOSITY (edited 01-31-2002).]

[This message has been edited by HIVELOSITY (edited 01-31-2002).]

 
Posts: 2134 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 26 June 2000Reply With Quote
<Ol' Sarge>
posted
I start out with a powder that is known to work well for a particular cartridge that also gives at least 90 percent load density. Most of my loads are slightly compressed. I find the OAL for the barrel then I load three of each powder weights in increments up to the max load and then shoot them for groups. I go with the best group that has decent velocity. If I don't get good results I'll pick a powder either one step faster or slower and try again. Once a powder is selected I try different seating depths to see if it can be improved on.

Most important is to only make ONE change at a time.

There's a lot more detail than that, but this is the basics.

Every one of my 20 plus centerfires shoot into an inch or less, several under 1/4 inch using this method. I've had about five rifles over the years that I couldn't get to shoot to my liking. I either sold them or traded them off.

------------------
Be content with what you have but never with who you are.

 
Reply With Quote
<Dave King>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by RobertJ:
Dave
At what range do you this type of load development? I have tried it a 100yd and was not able decipher the information.

I shoot at 100 yards for development.

I plot every hit on a copy of the target that I keep at my location. I make a list of the loads and next to it I record the velosity and hit #, numbers 1 through 20.
At the end of the shooting I look at the numbers that hit the targets closest together. If there is a group of them from a series, hit # 5, 6, 7, and 8 for example I know that that area is a good powder load.

 
Reply With Quote
<2ndaryexplosioneffect>
posted
Roger,

If I had to say the one most important key to accuracy reloading is a chronograph. I loaded for 15-20 years before I got mine. I had loads SET IN STONE. They all changed and for the better. There is no other tool that will give you hard evidence of what your particular rifle likes and eliminate so many other factors that may give you misleading information. Velocity is not the key but consistent velocity is. All my guns shoot good groups at a low vel.-med vel.-& high vel. The velocities in-between are just OK. Visualized an �S� curve horizontally representing velocity as it increases. The peaks in the curve are where the guns shoot the best groups. The peaks in the curve will also represent the most consonant velocities shot to shot. The extreme spread in velocity or �standard deviation� is the key element and only available by the use of a chronograph. They pay for themselves in loading components in a very short time.

Blanket statement: Any rifle that spits out a bullet within 10 feet per second of the same velocity every shot will shoot a ragged hole at 100 yards. IF it doesn�t, there is a mechanical problem with the gun or the shooter. It is not the load.

Boy am I going to hear about this one,
Mike

 
Reply With Quote
<Michael Swickard>
posted
Here is a Prime example of removing vertical by just changing the seating depth of the bullet. The target with vert was jam seated and the other was seated 0.020" off the jam. Cartridge is a 308 Obermeyer w/ 0.333" neck, 134/10 BIB bullet, 45gr N135, Fed 210 Primer, 308 Lapua case.

During load development I found a powder and powder charge that gives good volume. Just by tweaking the seating depth of the bullet...groups tightened up!

[This message has been edited by Michael Swickard (edited 01-31-2002).]

 
Reply With Quote
<Michael Swickard>
posted
Here is a Prime example of removing vertical by just changing the seating depth of the bullet. The target with vert was jam seated and the other was seated 0.020" off the jam. Cartridge is a 308 Obermeyer w/ 0.333" neck, 134/10 BIB bullet, 45gr N135, Fed 210 Primer, 308 Lapua case.

During load development I found a powder and powder charge that gives good volume. Just by tweaking the seating depth of the bullet...groups tightened up!

[This message has been edited by Michael Swickard (edited 01-31-2002).]

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ricciardelli
posted Hide Post
Sure glad you posted those pictures! I have been trying to tell some people that vertical stringing cna be changed by adjusting seating depth, and they didn't believe me!

 
Posts: 3282 | Location: Saint Marie, Montana | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
<Michael Swickard>
posted
Bottomline, never rule out anything. Made me a believer for jumping bullets.

Ciao

Mike

 
Reply With Quote
<BigBob>
posted
ROGERINNEB,
I'd like to suggest that a whole lot depends on what you are willing to accept as a accurate load. Is one inch at 100 yards ok? Is 2" ok?. If you're hunting deer at 75 yards then two inches at a hundred yards will will do the job for you. If you're shooting prairie dogs at 400 yards, then 2" became inadequate 380 yards too soon.
Here are a few things that will help you improve your accuracy that are pretty basic.
You loads willnot improve without improving your components, and this starts with the cases. DONOT mix your cases. All the cases should be of the same make. If possible, of all the same lot. Just as different makes of brass vary, different lots by the same maker will also vary. Most manuals will indicate which powders gave the best results while they were developing the manuals. This is one reason all the reloaders I know all own several different manuals.
After sizing your cases, trim them all to the length of the shortest case. Most bullets made today will furinisk pretty good accuracy, but every rifle is an individual, they like what they like. If the barrel doesn't like a component, it will not shoot well. If your powder measure doesnot throw consistently, weigh your charges.
I use a diffent target for every test load I shoot and compare them at home. I also load three rounds to each load and start low and step up in half grain incriments for every load. I've never had much luck shooting all loads on one target.
I use Winchester cases because over the years in different test they have always been the most consistent. I use Hodgdon extruded "EXTREME" powders. These powders donot change with the weather. Hot or cold, they give the same ballistics. I always fire test loads from a bench with a shooting rest and sand bag. I want to test the rifle and load, not me..
I hope that this is of some help. If you really want to get into accuracy loading, Email me at BigBob3006@yahoo.com and I'll be glad to go into more detail.

------------------
BigBob

[This message has been edited by BigBob (edited 02-01-2002).]

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
What great input, as always, "I love this place."

Just to clarify, I am a pretty experienced (probably quite average for this crowd) accuracy oriented handloader. I use benchrest quality gear/dies/cleaning stuff, chrono, yadda yadda. My latest project will be a 6.5x06 built on Sako Long Action with a 28" Krieger barrel, McMillan stock.

My most accurate gun is a Cooper VE 21 in .223. Most perfect load is 27.5 gr. of H335 under Nosler 40gr. BT's. How did I arrive at this magic load? Steve Timm in Varmint Hunter said so . I started with a reduced load and worked up, seated the bullets as long as I could seeing as how they're so stubby! Sub .5 MOA five shots groups at 100 with boring regularity. Of course, I've got my dogs too! I just sent an Encore in .308 back to TC because I could get NOTHING to group better than 3 inches at 100 (3 shots) with terrible vertical stringing. After reading the above I wish I would have tinkered more with seating depth. BUT, my experience is, if you're shooting 3-4 inch 3 shot groups as a starting point with several tried and true bullet/powder combos (including 2 types of factory match ammo), something is WRONG.

The other thing that has really intrigued me but that I have not tried, is to take primed and sized brass to the range with a scale, measure and powder and loading as I go while working up loads. A setup for this is well described here:

http://www.shootingsoftware.com/reloading.htm

This is on the CED millenium chrony site.

This guy has some very unique and interesting thoughts on relaoding. I'd encourage you to take a look. He has some ideas that I had never thought of or seen before (and no, I don't work there or have stock..I just tripped across it!).

I am always pressed for time, and admit that I have sometimes approached load development from a less than systematic way. But I SWEAR I'm gonna' do it right this next time!

Roger

 
Posts: 648 | Location: Huskerville | Registered: 22 December 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia