THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Accubond
 Login/Join
 
new member
Picture of Sioux
posted
I have been having a hard time with reloading my 7mm Rem with the Accubond 140gr, every powder seems to be the wrong one, I even went to the Nosler site with no help, I have tried H4350, RL-19, H1000, IMR????, does anyone have any hints, to help. I have spent alot of time on AccuBond and I'm not sure if I should switch bullets or if I'm missing something.
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 308Sako
posted Hide Post
IMR 7828 was the original powder for the 7mm Mag, and is a top peerformer as are R22 and H4831.






Member NRA, SCI- Life #358 28+ years now!
DRSS, double owner-shooter since 1983, O/U .30-06 Browning Continental set.
 
Posts: 3611 | Location: LV NV | Registered: 22 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
Give Re-22 a whirl. Also, in my guns, the ABs seem to like being farther off the lands than other bullets.


Bobby
Μολὼν λαβέ
The most important thing in life is not what we do but how and why we do it. - Nana Mouskouri

 
Posts: 9405 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It seems your rifle is telling you something, so you might try another bullet before you test a bunch of other measures to make the Accubond work well. I'd try a different weight, but if you are determined to shoot a 140, there are a bunch to choose from: TSX, A-Frame, Partition, Ballistic Tip, etc.
 
Posts: 519 | Registered: 12 November 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Are the groups with the different powders consistent or are some better than others? Duckboat is right; maybe your rifle is telling you something---like it doesn't care for Accubonds or 140 grain bullets. Which one is it? Who knows.

If one powder's group is markedly better, then you might have hope. If they're all way away from acceptable then try either a different bullet weight or a differnt bullet. Sometimes, it just ain't going to happen.

I have an ABolt in .243 that simply does not shoot 55 gr bullets. Only once have I gotten better than a 2" group and most are 2.5"+ But it is great with 70 and 100 grainers. Why, I don't know, but I ain't fighting it.

LWD
 
Posts: 2104 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: 16 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sioux:
I have been having a hard time with reloading my 7mm Rem with the Accubond 140gr, every powder seems to be the wrong one, I even went to the Nosler site with no help, I have tried H4350, RL-19, H1000, IMR????, does anyone have any hints, to help. I have spent alot of time on AccuBond and I'm not sure if I should switch bullets or if I'm missing something.


1) Has the rifle been a proven shooter with any other bullet?

2) How is brass prep? brand? primer? consistent seating depth? runout?

3) EXACTLY what have you done to test all the previous powders with the ab bullet?

For example, did you do pressure test loads to find out maximum with each one first, then start loading test rounds in groups of 3?

If I recall, Barnes showed that Retumbo happened to be the best powder for their 140 bullet, so perhaps try it to.

My first recommendation is to try Re22 and/or VV N160 or N560, or Ramshot Magnum ball powder.

Unless we know exactly what you've done to test this bullet with the powders you mentioned, it is difficult to help. Then again, your rifle may just not like the 140 bullet.

I know a guy who picks a bullet, then 4-5 powders, looks at the max charge with all, and loads up 3 of each at the max (no he doesn't work up), and tests them. Whichever one shoots best at maximum is the one he works with.....beginning with seating depth, then primer changes if necessary.


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Simply, H-4831.


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 308Sako
posted Hide Post
An additional thought; have you tried the 140 Ballistic Tips for load development? They might show you that your box of Accubonds is the problem! My experience is that the Accubonds shoot better than the ballistic tips.






Member NRA, SCI- Life #358 28+ years now!
DRSS, double owner-shooter since 1983, O/U .30-06 Browning Continental set.
 
Posts: 3611 | Location: LV NV | Registered: 22 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jorge
posted Hide Post
sound of a grenade rolling....personally, I'd shitcan both the Accubombs and the Ballistic tips in favor of an Aframe, TSX, TBBC, etc. Unless you're just hunting whitetails then bullet selection is mostly irrelevant...jorge


USN (ret)
DRSS Verney-Carron 450NE
Cogswell & Harrison 375 Fl NE
Sabatti Big Five 375 FL Magnum NE
DSC Life Member
NRA Life Member

 
Posts: 7149 | Location: Orange Park, Florida. USA | Registered: 22 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My 7MM RM likes both Accubonds and Ballistic Tips. If your rifle isn't shooting well check it for loose screws and bedding problems first, worry about the bullet last. If you want to fool with finicky bullets that cost a lot go with jorge's selections.


Leftists are intellectually vacant, but there is no greater pleasure than tormenting the irrational.
 
Posts: 2899 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My Win. Mod 70 shoots them real tight with 65.3grs of IMR4350 out of a 26" tube.
 
Posts: 359 | Location: Corpus Christi,Texas | Registered: 19 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My ruger likes 69 grs of IMR7828 with the 140 accbonds and BT,
With the 140 bergers it likes 69.9 grs of retumbo.
 
Posts: 508 | Location: Newton,NC,USA | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hey Sioux, First off, Welcome Aboard! Darn nice Deer in your avitar.

I'd agree with the folks who said to try a different "weight" bullet. Just because we want to use a specific Bullet, doesn't necessarily mean the Rifle will shoot it well.

You might put those same Bullets in a different 7mmRemMag and have them shoot tiny groups. You just never know what a rifle will shoot well until you actually try it. And it can at times be frustrating.

I typically use Nosler B-Tips or Sierra MatchKings to Benchmark a rifle before I begin working with the Bullet I want to Hunt with. Gives me a bit of knowledge about where I "might" find Pressure Indicators as well as seeing if it will shoot at all. But, I do have to change "weights" occasionally.

I used to burn a lot of H870 when it was available, but it was very dirty with Light Bullets. Tried a lot of others and settled on the H1000 you had mentioned. Have used a bunch of it in a couple of 7mmRemMags and it has provided some fine accuracy.

Good Hunting and clean 1-shot Kills.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of bowhuntrrl
posted Hide Post
Accubonds and MagPro powder seem to work well together, at least in my experience. As others have mentioned, work up your loads with Ballistic tips, then try the same load with an Accubond.

Personally, I've found Accubonds to be the most consistently accurate bullets that I've ever loaded.


Elite Archery and High Country dealer.
 
Posts: 931 | Location: Somewhere....... | Registered: 07 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Rob1SG
posted Hide Post
My best 7RM groups with 140 Accubonds come with RL 22 but I have also found H4831 to be excellent.I love Retumbo in the heavy weights 160-175. Lots of experience here but more info is needed for us to really help.
 
Posts: 1111 | Location: Edmond,OK | Registered: 14 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have always had good luck seating the bullets from .005-.010 from the lands with any Nosler BT & AB. If you can't acheive the desired accuracy from that & using propellents that normally work well in that cartridge. I would think that for some reason the rifle does not care for that bullet. You could try a different weight & that might do the trick. All of this only applies if the rifle has already proven that it is capable of the accuracy you are looking for in the first place.
That being said, there are a lot of knowledgable people here that can help you figure this out.
 
Posts: 527 | Location: Tennessee U.S.A. | Registered: 14 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hey Jorge,
Just how many accubonds have blown up on game that YOU were shooting.
 
Posts: 31 | Registered: 05 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of smedley
posted Hide Post
Sioux,
I had a 7 that I could not get a 140 or even a 150 to tighten up very good. Went to 160's and it is workable...

I think I was using IMR7828.


______________________

Smedley

______________________
From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'
B.H.Obullshitter
------------------------------------
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery"
Winston Churchill
------------------------------------
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." Samuel Adams
------------------------------------
Facts are immaterial to liberals. Twisted perceptions however are invaluable.
------------------------------------
We Americans were tired of being thought of as dumb, by the rest of the world. So we went to the polls in November 2008 and removed all doubt.....let's not do it again in 2012 please.
 
Posts: 3242 | Location: Cruising through the Milky Way at 98,000fps | Registered: 03 October 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia