THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
243 Winchester question
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
Hi All,

Your wisdom would be appreciated as I am at a bit of a loss on this one. I picked up a remington 700 CDL in 243 and decided to use 95 grain Hornady SST. I have been using H4350 and have worked from 38.5 - 41.5 grains and accuracy is still not great. I used the smoked bullet method to determine COAL and it seems very long compared to the other 243's I have owned. The COAL for this particular rifle is 2.744 inches. I also have Varget and H380 on hand. In the past, with other 243's I have used Nosler 90g BT and 95 and 100g partitions with great success and with the 95/100 grain bullets, 41g of H4350 has been outstanding in every rifle. So, time to change bullets or use one of the other powders I have on hand? Also, anyone else have issues getting SST bullets to shoot well?

Thanks in advance

Mark
 
Posts: 17 | Registered: 21 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
So, time to change bullets or use one of the other powders I have on hand?


One or the other. If the H4350 isn't working with that bullet try a couple of other powders and see what happens. If that doesn't work then try another bullet.

Because the .243 is a legit dual use cartridge, the bullet weights are all over the spectrum, and you might have one that prefers 70 grainers or 55 grainers or something else.

LWD
 
Posts: 2104 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: 16 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Also, anyone else have issues getting SST bullets to shoot well?

SSTs have always shot very well for me.....as have ballistic tips from Nosler.

It's like this....it it isn't shooting well then change something......as suggested...change the powder.....then the bullet....something will work!


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I didn't notice you mention primer change? I have had a change to magnum primers in .270 help.
 
Posts: 36231 | Location: Laughing so hard I can barely type.  | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Red C.
posted Hide Post
My Ruger will not shoot the heavier bullets well, but it loves the lighter bullets. I hunt with 75 and 80 grain bullets, but it will even shoot the 58 grain Vmaxs well. I use Varget powder and get some tremendous groups. I suggest trying Varget with the bullet your now trying to use. If that doesn't help try a lighter bullet, say, a 75 grain.


Red C.
Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.
 
Posts: 909 | Location: SE Oklahoma | Registered: 18 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
With the bullet extended you have room for more powder.. How are pressures? Whats your velocity at 41.5 gr h 4350?... This is dangerous if you dont know what your doing, but it looks to me your underloading this particular gun... If you understand what to look for, very carefully work up your loads to velocity that the books says you should get at max if no signs of high pressure.. Watch primers, case sticking, etc and trim cases each time you shoot, etc.. I could be wrong, but wait for some one who has lots of experience that agrees with me before you proceed.. remember warmer days can increase pressures., so pay attention.. Dont change components or overal lenght without working load back up from lighter loads.. dave


hunter, blackpowder shooter, photographer, gemology, trap shooter,duck hunter,elk, deer, etc..
 
Posts: 249 | Location: central montana | Registered: 17 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You might get a better and more informed response (I don't mean that in a rude manner) if you duplicated this post on the EUROPEAN HUNTING part of the Forum.

Why? In Great Britain and a lot of Europe the .243 is used plenty as a "light deer" rifle rather than a varmint cartridge. Use of 95, 100 and 105 grain bullets is very, very, commonplace.

Indeed for some deer in Great Britain the .243 with a 100 grain bullet is about the legal minimum practical cartridge in terms of weight and diameter requirements of the bullet.

Hope this helps!
 
Posts: 6821 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You might try some Nosler BT's. If they give the same result, I would look at the rifle for some minor tune-up: bedding, stock clearance, tip pressure, crown, scope bases, etc.
.
 
Posts: 1184 | Registered: 21 April 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by enfieldspares:
You might get a better and more informed response (I don't mean that in a rude manner) if you duplicated this post on the EUROPEAN HUNTING part of the Forum.

Why? In Great Britain and a lot of Europe the .243 is used plenty as a "light deer" rifle rather than a varmint cartridge. Use of 95, 100 and 105 grain bullets is very, very, commonplace.

Indeed for some deer in Great Britain the .243 with a 100 grain bullet is about the legal minimum practical cartridge in terms of weight and diameter requirements of the bullet.

Hope this helps!


Enfield
There are probably 100X the number of 243s in Europe used in the US and nearly all of them for whitetails. I would not be surprised if there are more deer taken in Texas with .243s than in all of Europe.
 
Posts: 9207 | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I find that I can shoot 45 gr H4350 with 100 gr 2.725" OAL, the extractor groove grows .001"

If I back off to 43 gr H4350 100 gr Honady round nose moly coated 2.275", I get 2975 fps with a 24" barrel, and long brass life [the primer pockets do not get loose after many firings]

If you are not moly coated, that would be 41.7 gr.
 
Posts: 9043 | Location: on the rock | Registered: 16 July 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
I tried SSTs in my 280 & 7mm Dakota & just couldn't get the accuracy I usually get from NBTs or even plain old Speer soft points.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Oddbod
posted Hide Post
I've found the SST's invariably need seating a lot further out in order to be close to the lands than other bullets due to the shape of the ogive.
That's one of the reasons I've gone back to Partitions.
 
Posts: 610 | Location: Cumbria, UK | Registered: 09 July 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia