one of us
| Why convert to a 100-year-old obsolete cartridge? Especially one that had case extraction problems when it was "on the market"? ------------------ http://stevespages.com/page8.htm |
| Posts: 3282 | Location: Saint Marie, Montana | Registered: 22 May 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Bertram brass for the .450 #2 is available ($5 each, ouch) from Huntington's or Graf's, but the capacity of this enormous case makes loading a bit touchy. The .450 3-1/4 is eough smaller that loading is simpler and cases are considerably less expensive as well; that would be my choice for a Ruger #1 conversion. Graeme Wright lists loads and techniques for both in Shooting the British Double Rifle, which is also a pretty good read. With modern brass you'll not have extraction problems with either one. [This message has been edited by bpesteve (edited 04-09-2002).] |
| Posts: 978 | Location: paradise with an ocean view | Registered: 09 April 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| FLA3006. I HAVE A DOUBLE RIFLE IN 450 No2. I AM VERY FOND OF THIS CARTRIDGE IN A DOUBLE RIFLE. HOWEVER IN A RUGER No.1 THERE IS NO NEED TO CHAMBER FOR A CARTRIDGE THAT HAS BRASS THIS EXPENSIVE AND IS ONLY AVIALABLE FROM ONE SOURCE. THE No.1 EJECTS RIMLESS BRASS WITH NO PROBLEM, WHY NOT CHAMBER FOR THE .458 LOTT, THEN IN A PINCH YOU COULD USE .458 WINCHESTER AMMO. THIS IS A SIMPLE RECHAMBER JOB IN A .458 No.1. |
| |