Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
is compressed powder inherently safe. I don't mean overloaded compressed powder, but rather compression of powder. | ||
|
one of us |
Yup! Assuming you're following reloading info from a reliable source. Years ago, I loaded 60 grs. of H-4831 in my .270 Win. with a 130 gr. bullet. Powder was always crunched some. Bear in Fairbanks Unless you're the lead dog, the scenery never changes. I never thought that I'd live to see a President worse than Jimmy Carter. Well, I have. Gun control means using two hands. | |||
|
One of Us |
No roger Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone.. | |||
|
One of Us |
Absolitely.....there's nothing at all bad about compressing a charge! /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
Yes. And in some cases preferred. | |||
|
One of Us |
I'm sure it's safe to some degree. For me, it's outside the parameters of safety. If you want so much velocity that you need to compress the powder, either use another powder or be satisfied with a slower velocity. Makes no sense to possibly damage your gun or hurt yourself... | |||
|
One of Us |
I suspect Roger's post is in reference to the word "inherently" /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill | |||
|
one of us |
If there were any danger of crushing powder, the smokeless Savage 10MLII muzzle loader would not exist. We 10MLII shooters have to make certain to get 'er all in there as tight as possible. Several manuals state that a certain load is a compressed load. If one knows a load is within safe pressures, there is nothing wrong with compressing said load, if it is according to the manual. | |||
|
One of Us |
Several of the books will note that a published load is compressed. As a general thing, compressing stick powder doesn't hurt as long as you stay reasonable. You shouldn't, however, try to compress ball powder. Aim for the exit hole | |||
|
One of Us |
Or you could Google "compressed powder loads." Compressed loads are fine in most instances. The .458 Win. Mag. was having problems with compressed loads, but this was in African heat. The powder was sometimes sluggish to ignite. That led to the development of the .458 Lott, which provides a bit more space for the load. Chief concern with compressed loads is that the powder can push the bullet forward in the neck of the case. That can create feed problems and set the bullet against the lands in the chamber. Both are problematic. But if you search load data online, you'll see compressed powder specs regularly. It's been SOP forever. | |||
|
One of Us |
It depends. In loading a 270 it would be ok to compress H4831 as it is slow burning but compressing Blue Dot in a 270 might lead to a surprise. It depends on the burn rate of the powder. | |||
|
One of Us |
Find me, please, a published/legitimate compressed powder load for a 270 using Blue Dot. You could fill the case with Bullseye until the load needs to be compressed, but then you'd be over-charging the reload. The distinction is not about "compressed loads" but rather about safe load charges. | |||
|
One of Us |
Generally, when I'm looking for the optimum powder for any given load or cartridge, I'll search the manual for the load that shows "C" for compressed. Then if I have that powder on hand, I'll put the max load in one piece of brass, and look down the neck to see just what is the level of the powder, and whether it's up into the neck or not. If it looks like the compression will be slight, all things considered, then I'll drop back to the starting load and work up. Generally it works out where the the powder is slightly compressed when the optimum load is found, and also generally I have the best accuracy with these loads. If it turns out that the load is going to be severely compressed, I'll look for another powder, but slightly compressed is good. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Agree with KB's approach. | |||
|
one of us |
I understand that a load density of 100% is never a bad point to start. It at least asures that the powder is always in the same position and ignition uniform. | |||
|
One of Us |
Seems like when you shake almost every factory round you can hear the powder rattling inside the case. So it must be that the factories don't believe in compressed loads. | |||
|
One of Us |
I can guarantee you that at least one factory does indeed believe in compressed loads. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
That's why we handload. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Ooops. I thought you would get the sarcasm about the compressed load of Blue Dot in a 270!!!! My error. I'm thinking that with a load of say 59 grains of Blue Dot the likely the surprise I referred to would be a gun in pieces. I should have put TIC ( tongue in cheek )to let you know that was a funny. My bad. | |||
|
one of us |
Inherently, no. It will obviously depend on the powder chosen. A compressed load of 7828 in the 280 is probabyl going to be fine but a compressed load of 3031 woudl likely take teh gun apart. LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT! | |||
|
one of us |
Factories or rather, their controllers believe in low cost. Less powder in a hull translates into cheaper manufacturing for them. Powder is the main cost factor, if you save 5 or even 10% there, this is at the end of the day a lot of money. | |||
|
One of Us |
I always look for a slow enough powder to give 90%+ load density when I work up a handload in all cartridges when using a stick powder. Thirty-two of my fifty-six loads are compressed slightly. All thirty-two shoot sub-moa. My dad told me once that if you're gonna kill a rattler with a chainsaw, use the top of the bar. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia