THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Win. or Rem. Brass?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
i usually have gotten Win. brass for reloading(especially for .223) but i just bought a bag for the second time that had a casing w/ a split down the neck. Has anyone has this happen to them with Remington brass? Is one better than the other?


"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who don't"
-Thomas Jefferson

Semper Fidelis
 
Posts: 62 | Location: Eastern Washington | Registered: 30 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I too have had split Win. brass as of late (last 2 years). But I've had Rem. brass with the flash hole punched severly off center, not that that is all that serious. But still I prefer the harder Win. brass than the softer Rem. brass. That is my preference only. The Rem. brass shows pressure signs earlier (flows) than Winschester. It is also true that due to the thicker Rem. brass, I have found that it will develope slightly higher velocities with less powder. But my preference still goes to Win. brass. It is my belief that Norma is about the same hardness as Win. but I am not certain of that. I do know it (Norma) is a very good quality brass as far as dimensions and not having the above mentioned deficiencies. Just a observation.


"The right to bear arms" insures your right to freedom, free speech, religion, your choice of doctors, etc. ....etc. ....etc....
-----------------------------------one trillion seconds = 31,709 years-------------------
 
Posts: 1521 | Location: Just about anywhere in Texas | Registered: 26 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Nowadays near as I can tell, it's six of one and half a dozen of the other. Just another observation.
 
Posts: 8169 | Location: humboldt | Registered: 10 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Chalk it up to Obama. The component manufacturers are running at record pace without adding workers as they know the demand will end and they will have to layoff/payoff. QC has to drop a bit from the shear volume. I am not buying any components until things calm down if at all possible due to this, or buy 100 pieces in hopes of getting 50 good ones(acceptable to me) or at least 40.


PA Bear Hunter, NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1625 | Location: Potter County, Pennsylvania | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Win Brass has served me very well on straight walled pistol cartridges. I have found very little slits or pocket deformity.

As Far as rifle cartridges, I have had better luck with Remmington than with WW. And I do highly recommend that you cull through all cases, especially new ones these days as quality is a bit lacking. I find about 1 in every 250 new cases requires that I toss them.
 
Posts: 155 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 13 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The problem with that, Airgun, is that when "things calm down", if Obama & Biden have their way, there won't be any need for components.


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
I like just about any of the brands but Federal. I prefer Lapua, RWS, Norma, Nosler, Hornady, Win, RP & Fed last.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 243winxb
posted Hide Post
quote:
Is one better than the other?

Winchester is a hair better IMO. But shop by price as brass changes from lot to lot, day to day.
 
Posts: 1295 | Location: USA | Registered: 21 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I like WW brass. It weights less than Rem, so Rem will be a hotter loaded the same. Ive had some WW brass split/crack necks early but I just anneal and seems to solve the problem, and some no problem withcracks at all. I aneal new brass or right after the first time loaded and every four or five loads
 
Posts: 1845 | Registered: 01 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Whatever is easiest to get where you are. Over the years, I have gotten good service from Remington but can't say I've made any comparisons. I use Lapua in a couple of target rifles but that's a different story.
I began using Remington for the very scientific reason of that's what the little gun shop carried when I began reloading.


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Is one better than the other?


Not really. It's different but only by a small amount. Which is "better" is a relitive thing, what do you mean by better?

A few more reloads before failure? Probably Remington.

A tad more powder for a tad faster load? Probably Winchester.

Potential accuracy difference? On average, there ain't any difference.
 
Posts: 1615 | Location: South Western North Carolina | Registered: 16 September 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
If you're so offput by finding split necks in your new brass, thus not getting your money's worth, my suggestion would be to buy Lapua brass. I've never found a defect in their product.

I wonder if Winchester would replace defective brass if you notified them? Couldn't hurt to ask.
 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i usually buy rem. but,to me it really dosnt make any different. federal makes good brass to..
 
Posts: 1137 | Location: SouthCarolina | Registered: 07 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It's like asking if you like Chevys or Fords.
They each have their followers. Each gets the job done.

+1 with Airgun1 Hold off buying if you can.

muck
 
Posts: 1052 | Location: Southern OHIO USA | Registered: 17 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I used to be a Winchester man through and through, but no longer!
After buying several bags in different calibres and loading them, I found dimpled spots on some necks, and a lot of it would crack the neck on the first firing.
I switched to Remington in all calibres and have not seen one split neck yet!
The only Winchester brass I have (257Bob w-w super) is annealed before use 'cause it's for my 257AI, it's the best brass I've ever used in it.

As a side note, can anyone tell me if "w-w super" brass is still being made? I have not seen that headstamp on any Win brass for quite a few years.
 
Posts: 683 | Location: N E Victoria, Australia. | Registered: 26 February 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I used to think that W-W Super marked breass was intended for reloaders and Winchester headstamp for factory ammo.

Now I think it is more of a case of old tooling vs newer replacement tooling. I say this because the lower volume cartridges typically remain W-W- Super because they haven't been used as much and haven't needed replaced yet.

I see WW Supewrs in 257 Roberts, 257 Roberts +P, 220 Swift, 375 H&H etc.

30-06, 223 Rem is Winchester marked as examples.

Bottomline, who has the true fact? I would be interested to know as well.


PA Bear Hunter, NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1625 | Location: Potter County, Pennsylvania | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It used to be that Winchester and Remington brass was as good as it got.

Now, I keep on reading about defects with branded brass.

And I think it is a trend.

Brass manufacturers must have gotten sloppy. Have they offshored their facilities to Communist block countries or third world nations?
 
Posts: 1228 | Registered: 10 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SlamFire:
It used to be that Winchester and Remington brass was as good as it got.

Now, I keep on reading about defects with branded brass.

And I think it is a trend.

Brass manufacturers must have gotten sloppy. Have they offshored their facilities to Communist block countries or third world nations?


With the run on reloading components as well as loaded cartridges over the past couple years it wouldn't surprise me if some manufactures hadn't gone "off shore". We were buying it up faster way faster than they could make the stuff. It is a great way to meet a huge increase in demand without the millions of dollars invested in machines, men, and buildings. Only to see the demand dry up. Leaving the company holding huge debit with little prospect of return on the investment. Not to mention all the new employees who will have to be laid off.
Sorry for the soap box thing.

muck
 
Posts: 1052 | Location: Southern OHIO USA | Registered: 17 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've been very happy with Winchester brass in many calibers. I did get a few duds in a batch of 500 30-06 cases. Winchester more than made up for it with coupons. Wish Win would come out with RUM brass.

That said I stick to Lapua and Norma for tighter chamber custom rifles.
 
Posts: 969 | Registered: 13 October 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia