THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM CAST BULLET FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Wheelweight contaminants?
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
Here in the suburbs, every tire shop I�ve been to has a contract to some recycler, but one guy gave up on his rounds, so I just scored 130 pounds of wheelweights and 20 lbs of trash - free! Trouble is, as I was sorting through them, some rang like little bells, some clunked, and some were somewhere in between. I remember going through ww topics on the Shooters forum, but didn�t pay enough attention because I was using only pure -paid-for lead and lino and tin. Now I want to refine this stuff, but I�m concerned about getting some zinc contamination and ruining the whole batch. I have about 25 lbs of stick-on ww�s and 105 lbs of regular ones, and about 10 lbs of questionables. I�m planning on melting the good stuff down all at once in an cut down propane tank. What do I have to look out for in sorting these Lyman's in the rough? Thanks, Stan
 
Posts: 18 | Location: Southern California | Registered: 25 August 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Howdy, Stan.

A couple years back, with EXACTLY the same concerns you express, I ran a little experiment.

My wheelweights come from shops located on I-80, which as a major Interstate highway sees all kinds of traffic...new cars, old cars, import cars, big rigs etc., which also means the shops get a vast variety of different WW types. If ever any "oddball" WW were going to get into a bucket of used ones, it would seem likely that shops located on an Interstate would be prime places.

I took a whole bucket of used WW fresh from the tire shoppe, about 140 pounds, and sorted out all the suspicious ones....granular looking, painted, plastic-coated...ANYTHING out of the ordinary. After I had them sorted I got to wondering about just how "bad" the rejects really were, hence my experiment.

I fired up my RCBS furnace and cast a bunch of bullets from the "good" wheelweights in that bucket, and then cast another bunch from the "bad", or rejected, oddball-looking wheelweights. I then compared the results of the two batches of bullets.

There was NO APPRECIABLE DIFFERENCE in "castability", in weight, in diameter, or in appearance. So....now I don't bother sorting them at all, although I do pick out the soft stick-on weights for muzzleloaders and alloying purposes. I certainly would get rid of any WW that floated on the top of the melt, or behaved in any other strange fashion, just for piece of mind. Apart from that, I don't concern myself.

In smelting at least several tons of WW for my personal use, I have yet to encounter any problem with contamination.

Regards from BruceB (aka Bren Mk1)
 
Posts: 437 | Location: nevada | Registered: 01 March 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Stan,

it sounds like your going about it the right way. Keep every thing in marked ingots. I use a die mark pen to identify them later. I don't remember my last batch of WW having that high a percentage of stick on one's. Suppose more and more people are getting alloy wheels that require them. I think they'll be quite soft, but seperating that backing can be real fun. That's an outside job, as the caustic smoke is terrible. Should run this by Felix, but I wonder if that adhesive is toxic?. Be careful with the skimmings and the dust in the bottom of the pot, thats heavy stuff!!...Geo
 
Posts: 57 | Location: South Dakota | Registered: 20 February 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia