20 November 2007, 02:47
LeopardtrackLeica Geovid vs. Swarovski SLC's optical quality???
I am about to take the plunge and trade in my Swarovski 10x42 SLC's towards the Leica Geovids also in 10x42.
Range-finder aside, how would you compare the optical qaulity of each binocular? My Swarovskis are crystal clear, and the Leicas seem to be as well, but I only looked through them in the store.
I am hoping for some imput from any of you who have experience with each pair.
Thanks!
20 November 2007, 05:19
Fish30114Wolfgar, I own them both and the difference isn't detectable to me. I thought the Leica's were better for a couple of minutes one day at the range when comparing them side by side, but then I remembered my Swaro's had just been afield with me, I brushed of the objective lenses, and then I couldn't tell a difference any more.
Love that built in laser though--it is the shiznit!
20 November 2007, 06:05
woodsTill they break (Leica Geovids 10x42's)
quote:
Update:
Sent off e-mail to request status yesterday and received this:
quote:
We did receive your binoculars. The repair order number is XXXXXX. Unfortunately, the turn around time on these is 3 to 4 months. The scheduled repair date is mid March.
Now that sucks! Brand new this year, something minor wrong and it takes this long.
20 November 2007, 06:34
LeopardtrackThanks for the reply's fellas! That does suck, having the range finder shit the bed....that is one of the pit falls of technology! But when you range you target in 2 seconds, they will be worth it.
Any more reveiw's out there??
20 November 2007, 18:35
scubaproYou should compare the Leicas with the Swaro EL! That´s by far in my opinion the best scope from Swaro...
20 November 2007, 19:45
woodsUpdate
quote:
I checked with the technicians and they said they would have the repair complete by December 14th.
Now that's better. A positive response to a complaint about repair time.
