The Accurate Reloading Forums
Any one use the Swaro Z6 5x30x50 scope?
06 April 2011, 01:03
dogcatAny one use the Swaro Z6 5x30x50 scope?
Anyone use the Swarovski Z6 5 x 30 x 50 scope for hunting?
What do you think about it?
06 April 2011, 13:30
scubaproWhat Do You hunt? If You need the high magnifition: The optics are perfect!!! Think about an illuminated reticle - you may regret not taking one...
09 April 2011, 03:41
dogcatScuba,
I had a chance to pick up one at 40% off retail.
Thought it sounded like a fun, long range scope but am not sure.
I have a couple of illuminated scopes - I like them a lot.
10 April 2011, 02:10
Claret_DabblerI have the 3-18x50. Fantastic scope, however, away from a bench, I find anything more than 12x unusable.
If you are shooting on a range in good light you can use the high mag, but not in low light field conditions. I also have a Z6 2-12x50, this is a much more "friendly" scope to use.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not out to get you....
10 April 2011, 03:41
Jim M.It is probably an excellent scope being a Swarovski. I would be interested in it if I didn't already have 2 of the Swarovski 6 X 18 TDS scopes. Use both on varmint rifles. The higher power would be very helpful ringing the loads out from the bench and shooting longer distances in good light. Has there been any test reports of the scope yopu are interested?
Jim
12 June 2011, 13:52
Andre MertensSwarovski asked me to test their 5-30x50P and write it up in a hunters' magazine. I installed it on my AICS-Rem 700 .308 Win and rapidly fell in love with the scope (I did not actually hunt with it, though). The only sad point was that I had to return the scope after completion of the testing
André
DRSS
---------
3 shots do not make a group, they show a point of aim or impact.
5 shots are a group.
quote:
Originally posted by Andre Mertens:
Swarovski asked me to test their 5-30x50P and write it up in a hunters' magazine. I installed it on my AICS-Rem 700 .308 Win and rapidly fell in love with the scope (I did not actually hunt with it, though). The only sad point was that I had to return the scope after completion of the testing
Andre, you're going to have to change your ways and the price for testing and write up is you get to keep the test item

Of course you would have to limit your testing to stuff like Sauer, Mauser, Blaser, Zeiss, Leica, etc. Waidmannsheil, Dom.
-------- There are those who only reload so they can shoot, and then there are those who only shoot so they can reload. I belong to the first group. Dom ---------
23 January 2012, 07:42
TexKDDogcat and others.
I am kinda maybe looking at moving out of my Leupold 6.5 x 20 x 50 on my long range 7 Mag rig.
I am just curious of how did the Swaro work out if you got it, and your opinions of it now.
I am looking at both the Z5 and the Z6 (gasp $$$$) in the 5 x 25 which would seem enough or the 5 x 30 Z6.
Have you, or Andre or others, seen a better eye positioning on the Swaro vs the Leupold? And did anyone use the Swaro ballistic turret?
Finally how about the available adjustment. I think the Leupold has 94 elevation and 94 windage.
I am really a two scope owner in either the Leupold or Swaro. Anything else I should know or that you might share

?
Thanks.
08 February 2012, 20:17
PATRIOT76i have a new 2-12x50 z6 in the classifieds that is awesome, great optics and light for a 50mm
10 February 2012, 02:48
londonhunterIt is absolutely an optical marvel
Clarity at 30x is beyond reproach
Those who struggle with high mag tunnelling don't even understand the basis of optics
If the stock does not fit them they will struggle with 30x magnification
23 February 2012, 10:32
NorsemanHow about the eyebox?
27 February 2012, 13:26
dogcatNorse,
What is an "eyebox"? That term is unfamiliar to me.
29 February 2012, 09:52
Norsemandog,
eyebox, when the magnification is crank all the way up (30X), is it much more difficult to position your eye behind the eye piece such as requiring a perfect cheek weld everytime on the riflestock otherwise the image will very easily blackout?