The Accurate Reloading Forums
Opinions on the Burris Fullfield II 2-7x35 for a UL rifle

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1421043/m/728103516

01 February 2007, 18:51
Mark in GA
Opinions on the Burris Fullfield II 2-7x35 for a UL rifle
I have a Ruger M77 MkII Ultra-Light (Stainless & Sythetic) rifle in 243 Win. that I need to scope. This rifle has a 20" lightweight barrel. I don't want to add too bulky of a scope to it and my budget is pretty limited.

I am considering the Burris FF II 2-7x35mm scope w/ the Ballistic-Plex reticle for $160. Has anyone tried this scope? How would it compare to the more common Burris FF II 3-9x40mm for $180-$200. Do you think the smaller 35mm objective would gather enough light for hunting in the woods here in the east?

Thanks,
Mark in GA
03 February 2007, 10:28
bowhuntrrl
At its highest power, the 2-7x35 still has a 5mm exit pupil. This is larger than the amount of light that the eye can take in. Assuming that you'll be using it a lower power most of the time, it should be plenty bright !!! I was thinking of trying one of those on my Knight muzzle loader.


Elite Archery and High Country dealer.
18 March 2007, 18:59
Don Slater
Guys,

Check this out! Will fit the Ruger like a glove!

http://store.discoveryoptics.com/st101693.html


If you must go with Burris, the short mag series will be better.