One of Us
| No advice, just admiration and envy.
NRA Benefactor Member US Navy Veteran
|
| Posts: 1131 | Location: Brownstown, Michigan | Registered: 19 April 2015 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| C&H is from about 1959. |
| Posts: 469 | Location: central California | Registered: 26 October 2006 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I own/owned both of those scopes they are nice scopes. Choosing between them would not have any disadvantages, I would caution you to instead choose the power range that is most suitable rather go for looks, I find that your power range is more suited to open or semi open terrain and if any woods type hunting is to be done then they do not have enough field of view or a large enough eye box, something in the 1.5-6 x 42 range would be more suitable then, try and look through some scopes before deciding anyway. BB |
| Posts: 406 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 06 April 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I would have a close look at the Swarovski z3 4-12x42 or the Schmidt & Bender Summit of similar size. Both are 1” tubes. Sadly we no longer get either here in the UK. Kahles also do a similar 1” tubed scope for older rifles, but with the added benefit of a discrete dialable turret and an illuminated red dot. You might not be able to dial out to 1,000m but any sort of normal hunting range no issue. https://www.kahles.at/en/hunt/...opes/helia3-4-12x44i |
| Posts: 987 | Location: Scotland | Registered: 28 February 2011 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by GaryG: C&H is from about 1959.
Thanks Gary, H&H tended to put Zeiss and Nickel Supra scopes on the rifles they made around that time. You can still find good Nickels on eBay of all sizes and ranges but they are less water-resistant than Zeiss/Hensoldt and sometimes show fungus inside the lenses, around the periphery. While this may not show when you look through them, it does indicate they've been compromised and may not be so good in wet weather. |
| Posts: 5166 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009 |
IP
|
|