Im looking at a reaonably high mag scope for an HMR. I don't want to spend huge amounts so have decided on either the Buckmaster 4-14 x 40BDC or 3200 4-12 x 40 BDC.
I've not used either but have a Monarch and 4200 and prefer the Monarch.

Also is the BDC reticule on the Nikon useable or is it a bit too "busy" for normal use.

I have no experience with the 3200, but I cannot say enough good things about my Buckmaster 6-18x40 especially for the price. IMHO, Nikon is the best value for the $$$ in scopes today. I do not have any experience with the BDC reticle.

Both scopes are very nice scopes, but I personally believe that the Nikon Buckmaster is a slightly better scope.

The Buckmaster is a much better scope IMO.

Reloader

Thanks all.
Just received the 6-18 and it is a superb piece of kit. I would go as far as suggesting it is better than my 4-16 x 40 4200.

I just saw some new Buckmasters at Academy Sports, they look cosmetically different from the older Nikon's. Did they change the optics?

The Nikon BM is a tremendous value.
Good choice!!