Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums?a=tpc&s=...=117105786#117105786 Just posting this here also! We don't need to put up with Crap customer service.... | ||
|
One of Us |
223 is a scope wrecker . A caliber of that magnitude needs a nightforce minimum in badger bases and rings. Thanks for the heads up I was going to buy a V1-3 for a 45/70 guess it will be another brand instead | |||
|
one of us |
Sorry to hear about your bad experience with the Weaver scopes. I had a few of them years back when they were part of the RCBS Outers group, and those made in Japan scopes were very good for the money. I really like the KT-15 scope I had on a Savage .223, and the V9 and V10 were pretty good, too. My current scopes are a couple of Burris Fullfield II 3-9 Ballistiplex, a Nikon Buckmasters 4.5-14 SF, and my latest, a Leupold VX-3 4.5-14. The Leupold is nice, but for the money, the Buckmasters is pretty good, too. I guess I can cross the Weavers off the list of future options. Bullets are pretty worthless. All they do is hang around waiting to get loaded. | |||
|
one of us |
I sent a 6 to 20 grand slam back that was totally destroyed from a fall about 10 weeks ago. They sent me a replacement at no charge so they have served me just fine. | |||
|
one of us |
I saw a Bushnell 4X12 that came apart on an AR-15. The rear lens inside of the power change tube popped out of the tube. You could see it loose inside the ocular bell. I supposed it must have been glued into the tube and the reciprocation of the AR-15 bolt knocked it loose. Anyway no cheap scopes for me. | |||
|
One of Us |
I feel the same.. Reluctantly.. but that is how I look at them since Meade purchased them.... Nikon Buckmasters and the Monarchs are pretty darn decent scopes.... | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia