THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM OPTICS FORUM


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
nikon monarch series rifle scope
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
do you guys have any likes or dislikes on nikon monarch series scopes, my budget is 4-600$, have heard alot on vortex viper pst series, any input is always appreciated. Nikon years ago made 35mm cameras and they were always considered top of the line people made remarks because the lenses were top.
 
Posts: 85 | Registered: 07 January 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
i have a couple of them and like the glass on them.
if i get another one it will be without the bdc circles however.
 
Posts: 5002 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
i have some of each & prefer the vortex. it seems to my eyes to be a bit sharper
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Nikon glass is excellent---much better than Leupold. The build quality is excellent. The reliability is superb. The only criticism I can level at them is that at higher magnifications, the eyebox can get touchy. Otherwise, excellent.

LWD
 
Posts: 2104 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: 16 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have never had any problems with a Monarch.I have them on a 338 and a 375.
 
Posts: 4372 | Location: NE Wisconsin | Registered: 31 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I use Nikon optics and have yet to have trouble with any of them. They are fine.
 
Posts: 152 | Location: Alberta, Canada | Registered: 29 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
I've owned a few Nikon products, remembering the company as numero uno in SLR cameras years ago. The lenses seem fine to me but my 4-16 Monarch has so much tunnel vision I replace it with a Leupold VX-1 when I don't need extreme range provisions.
 
Posts: 5161 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Absolutely love the Japan models. Have had 2 of the newer monarchs made in the Phillipines, and am not a real fan. The tracking was not great on either and the eyebox got frustrating. They are still quite clear though.
 
Posts: 849 | Location: MN | Registered: 11 March 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I made the mistake once of buying a camera from a company that primarily makes riflescopes, thinking that if it makes good riflescopes it can make good cameras. Unfortunately, the product was was ill-adapted for use as a camera and had to be discarded.

Likewise, people sometimes make the mistake of buying riflescopes made by camera companies thinking that if they make good cameras they can make good riflescopes.

If you want a picture, buy a Nikon.
If you want to shoot at something and hit it, buy a Leupold.
 
Posts: 13264 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
We judge our scopes by trying to count the bolts on an access plate on the water tower down the road. My late BIL's Leupold VX-1 kicked my Nikon's butt. I let it go with a 700 Rem I sold. Better glass?.....I'm not buying that.
 
Posts: 16242 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 10 April 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia