One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by Joe R. Lock:
I was wondering if the mount being slightly loose was probably what caused the irratic shooting?
joe YES!!!
My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.
|
| Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| For sure the loose screws is the first place to look. Check your bases mounted to the rifel as well. Then chck your scope. There are certain inch pounds you should tighten too, so dont just go cranking away, you can shear off screws and crush scope tubes. |
| |
One of Us
| When you remount, EVERYTHING, use blue locktite on all the screws and get a Wheeler torquing screwdiver. |
| Posts: 801 | Location: Pinedale WY USA & Key West FL USA | Registered: 04 February 2011 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Glad the fix was an easy one. Hard to spend too much on a scope, easy to spend too much on a rifle. |
| Posts: 801 | Location: Pinedale WY USA & Key West FL USA | Registered: 04 February 2011 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Joe--Welcome to the site. A good lesson to be learned from your experience. You didn't say what type scope, but I'm guessing a lower priced one that saves one money. You are now out the cost of some ammo and a trip to the range and you got nothing accomplished. The scope will probably need to be sent off for repairs--more cost. Get a Leupold (and yes they do give problems too on occasion), and for the most part they are reliable. |
| Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Joe--You often hear Tasco's called Trashco's, but my late gunsmith had a Sweeny Collimator for setting up scopes. He said Tasco World Class were amongst the few other than Leupolds that held their zero through the variable range. Was a time when Tasco World Class and Leupolds were about same price. I do have one on my 22-250 and it has not given me problems. Understand about the ammo not being a big deal when you reload and were going to shoot anyways. But add in those $48 repair bills, postage and trip to post office etc and sometimes a cheaper scope really aint. |
| Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The older World Classes (from the eighties) weren't bad for the money. Still I'd get a new one and keep it for a spare. |
| Posts: 3174 | Location: Warren, PA | Registered: 08 August 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Back in the late seventies I purchased a Tasco World Class scope. Cost was about 1/3 the price of a Leupold. Mine was a3-9x40 and I paid around $60.00 for it, IIRC a new Leupold3-9x40 was $150-$160. It was a satisfactory scope, I wound up giving it to my brother-in-law. I think it would be stretching things quite a bit to put it in the same class as a Leupold, and for sure it wasn't in the same price range. Later on, early 90's IIRC, I purchased another World Class scope. It was a piece of @#$%. Tasco had been bankrupt and sold or re-organized and the new World Class scopes weren't near as good as the original. I got rid of that one ASAP.
velocity is like a new car, always losing value. BC is like diamonds, holding value forever.
|
| |
one of us
| That was almost exactly my experience. The newer ones are crap. |
| Posts: 3174 | Location: Warren, PA | Registered: 08 August 2002 |
IP
|
|