THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM OPTICS FORUM


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Optics double standard?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Kyler Hamann
posted
I’m at that age where I’m starting to need “cheater” glasses most of the time for reading and the computer. I get the cheap ones and leave them all over the place (one pair on my desk, one pair on my loading bench, etc.)

It dawned on me today that I won’t spend more than $3 on the eye glasses that I’ll sometimes wear 10+ hours per day, but its been several years since I paid less than $1,500 for a rifle scope that I typically won’t use more than a few hours at a time - and only a day or two per week.

I know it’s not logical, but somehow it makes sense to me. I guess it shows how important reading is to me compared to shooting. Does anybody else have similarly messed up priorities with this double standard for optics?

Kyler


___________________________
www.boaring.com

I'm so old that I still have some skills even without an internet connection or electricity.
___________________________
 
Posts: 2508 | Location: Central Coast of CA | Registered: 10 January 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I need mine full time, so I buy the best lenses and the cheapest frames. To me it makes no sense to worry about how I look in them as opposed to how I see through them!
 
Posts: 749 | Location: South Central Texas | Registered: 29 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Mike_Dettorre
posted Hide Post
Not a double standard if they work fine for you.

Kinda like me with regard to shooting sticks and ammo carriers.

I see no reason to spend $50-$200 on shooting sticks when I can make them in 15 minutes with $15 of material or to spend $80 on a leather ammo holder for my belt when a nylon one works fine at $12.99 - even if I have to buy 4 of them over a lifetime.


Mike

Never under estimate the internet community's ability to reply to your post with their personal rant about their tangentially related, single occurrence issue.



What I have learned on AR, since 2001:
1. The proper answer to: Where is the best place in town to get a steak dinner? is…You should go to Mel's Diner and get the fried chicken.
2. Big game animals can tell the difference between .015 of an inch in diameter, 15 grains of bullet weight, and 150 fps.
3. There is a difference in the performance of two identical projectiles launched at the same velocity if they came from different cartridges.
4. While a double rifle is the perfect DGR, every 375HH bolt gun needs to be modified to carry at least 5 down.
5. While a floor plate and detachable box magazine both use a mechanical latch, only the floor plate latch is reliable. Disregard the fact that every modern military rifle uses a detachable box magazine.
6. The Remington 700 is unreliable regardless of the fact it is the basis of the USMC M40 sniper rifle for 40+ years with no changes to the receiver or extractor and is the choice of more military and law enforcement sniper units than any other rifle.
7. PF actions are not suitable for a DGR and it is irrelevant that the M1, M14, M16, & AK47 which were designed for hunting men that can shoot back are all PF actions.
8. 95 deg F in Africa is different than 95 deg F in TX or CA and that is why you must worry about ammunition temperature in Africa (even though most safaris take place in winter) but not in TX or in CA.
9. The size of a ding in a gun's finish doesn't matter, what matters is whether it’s a safe ding or not.
10. 1 in a row is a trend, 2 in a row is statistically significant, and 3 in a row is an irrefutable fact.
11. Never buy a WSM or RCM cartridge for a safari rifle or your go to rifle in the USA because if they lose your ammo you can't find replacement ammo but don't worry 280 Rem, 338-06, 35 Whelen, and all Weatherby cartridges abound in Africa and back country stores.
12. A well hit animal can run 75 yds. in the open and suddenly drop with no initial blood trail, but the one I shot from 200 yds. away that ran 10 yds. and disappeared into a thicket and was not found was lost because the bullet penciled thru. I am 100% certain of this even though I have no physical evidence.
13. A 300 Win Mag is a 500 yard elk cartridge but a 308 Win is not a 300 yard elk cartridge even though the same bullet is travelling at the same velocity at those respective distances.
 
Posts: 10136 | Location: Loving retirement in Boise, ID | Registered: 16 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The right way to look at it is do cheaper optics do the same thing.

cheap eye glasses are not going to give you transition progressive and a bunch of other features.

$3 reading glasses most likely do the same thing as $300 glasses for just reading.

$20 does not do the same thing as $1000 leica or swaro.

Mike
 
Posts: 13145 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Some guys go to the cheapest optometrist or optician to get glasses, and in many cases do not even get regular exams. The quality of the eyeglasses matters, but not as much as the quality of the eye doctor. Simple reading glasses are not bad, but for other corrective lenses it makes a difference.
 
Posts: 156 | Registered: 06 November 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
Kyler's thinking is on the right track. Before we ever try to get scopes to make up for failing eyesight, we should see an optometrist or (better?) an ophthalmologist for up-to-date corrective spectacles.

To make scopes and binoculars substitute for eyeglasses is mistaken and potentially dangerous, because magnifying optics obscure much more country than they reveal.
 
Posts: 5106 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia