THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM OPTICS FORUM


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Most consistent clicks
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Mike_Dettorre
posted
Which scopes do you think have the most consistent adjustments and the least consistent adjustments? as in a 1/4 min is really a 1/4 min

Split it up by high dollar and medium dollar.


So lets put Zeiss, leica, and swarovski in one group

and

Leupold, Minox, high end weavers, highend bushnells in aother group.

Feel free to add any brands you want.


Mike

Never under estimate the internet community's ability to reply to your post with their personal rant about their tangentially related, single occurrence issue.



What I have learned on AR, since 2001:
1. The proper answer to: Where is the best place in town to get a steak dinner? is…You should go to Mel's Diner and get the fried chicken.
2. Big game animals can tell the difference between .015 of an inch in diameter, 15 grains of bullet weight, and 150 fps.
3. There is a difference in the performance of two identical projectiles launched at the same velocity if they came from different cartridges.
4. While a double rifle is the perfect DGR, every 375HH bolt gun needs to be modified to carry at least 5 down.
5. While a floor plate and detachable box magazine both use a mechanical latch, only the floor plate latch is reliable. Disregard the fact that every modern military rifle uses a detachable box magazine.
6. The Remington 700 is unreliable regardless of the fact it is the basis of the USMC M40 sniper rifle for 40+ years with no changes to the receiver or extractor and is the choice of more military and law enforcement sniper units than any other rifle.
7. PF actions are not suitable for a DGR and it is irrelevant that the M1, M14, M16, & AK47 which were designed for hunting men that can shoot back are all PF actions.
8. 95 deg F in Africa is different than 95 deg F in TX or CA and that is why you must worry about ammunition temperature in Africa (even though most safaris take place in winter) but not in TX or in CA.
9. The size of a ding in a gun's finish doesn't matter, what matters is whether it’s a safe ding or not.
10. 1 in a row is a trend, 2 in a row is statistically significant, and 3 in a row is an irrefutable fact.
11. Never buy a WSM or RCM cartridge for a safari rifle or your go to rifle in the USA because if they lose your ammo you can't find replacement ammo but don't worry 280 Rem, 338-06, 35 Whelen, and all Weatherby cartridges abound in Africa and back country stores.
12. A well hit animal can run 75 yds. in the open and suddenly drop with no initial blood trail, but the one I shot from 200 yds. away that ran 10 yds. and disappeared into a thicket and was not found was lost because the bullet penciled thru. I am 100% certain of this even though I have no physical evidence.
13. A 300 Win Mag is a 500 yard elk cartridge but a 308 Win is not a 300 yard elk cartridge even though the same bullet is travelling at the same velocity at those respective distances.
 
Posts: 10094 | Location: Loving retirement in Boise, ID | Registered: 16 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A click was a click on:

Leupold and March


A click wasn't a click on:

Zeiss, Swarovski, Minox
 
Posts: 211 | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Zeiss has always been my most consistent brand when it came to clicks. This was pretty much across their model range and over the last 20 years or so.

Swaro was a gamble for some older scopes I have, but newer models seem fine.

Leupold was a bit of a pain in the posterior, but at least the adjustments moved the POI in the right direction. New series VX-3 seems a lot better.

I only have one of their scopes, but my Weaver Grand Slam is actually very good.

In general, it seems very common for a given number of clicks to provide more adjustment than specified. So I normally click less than what the distance and specified clicks/inch would have led me to believe.

- mike


*********************
The rifle is a noble weapon... It entices its bearer into primeval forests, into mountains and deserts untenanted by man. - Horace Kephart
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would agree with Mike D so far as the Swaro and Leupolds go. ie the Swaros are more consistent than Leupolds. Haven't used the others enough.
 
Posts: 3174 | Location: Warren, PA | Registered: 08 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My S&B police marksman 3-12x50 is dead on....
 
Posts: 146 | Location: WI | Registered: 18 January 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've found Leupolds in the hunting scopes to be reasonbly consistent, but usually coarser than the advertised .25 MOA. Leupolds in the target-varmint powers seem pretty close to .25 MOA as represented.

The old El Paso Weavers had many faults, but their adjustments were dead-on. I have no idea about the scopes that are currently sold under the Weaver name.

A friend was attempting to sight-in three rifles at my place last weekend, all with Zeiss Conquest 3-9x44 scopes. From the results, it appears that all of those scopes moved considerably more than the .25 MOA assumed -- more like .4 MOA per click.
 
Posts: 13239 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My Leupold 6.5-20x40 are very consistent but give 1/3" rather than 1/4"


velocity is like a new car, always losing value.
BC is like diamonds, holding value forever.
 
Posts: 1650 | Location: , texas | Registered: 01 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stonecreek:
I've found Leupolds in the hunting scopes to be reasonbly consistent, but usually coarser than the advertised .25 MOA. Leupolds in the target-varmint powers seem pretty close to .25 MOA as represented.

The old El Paso Weavers had many faults, but their adjustments were dead-on. I have no idea about the scopes that are currently sold under the Weaver name.

A friend was attempting to sight-in three rifles at my place last weekend, all with Zeiss Conquest 3-9x44 scopes. From the results, it appears that all of those scopes moved considerably more than the .25 MOA assumed -- more like .4 MOA per click.


I don't know about the ones assembled in the U.S., but most of the German assembled Zeiss scopes I have owned seemed to move 1 Centimeter per click at 100 meters (.39" adjustments at 110 yards, roughly).

It would not surprise me if Leupold (with their wide international market) have also gone "Metric" without telling us. Not too much difference between 1/4 inch and 1/3" for must hunting uses.

Incidentally, the Central brand (Australia) receiver sights I prefered for my Palma rifles, came either way, 1/4" at 100 yards, or 1 cm at 100 meters.


Edited to add: a click which is worth about 1 cm at 100 meters, is only approximately .35" to .36" at 100 yards ( about .0039" less than 1 cm,) not very different from .333", which would be 1/3 inch at 100 yards.
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
As much as I have bashed them, my Leupolds were defintely th emost consitant. Back when i was able to shoot in competition i shot every day that was not hunting season or afull blown torrential downpour. those target turrets were moved thousands of clicks every year as i moved the elevation (i always held for the wind-shooting smallbor sihlouette) for the 4 ranges of the targets. I shot many "proper" groups, getting an aggregate of averageing 5, 5 shot groups at 40, 60, 77, and 100 meters. it hit where it clicked

HOWEVER- all scopes need to be "screwed in" when adjusted. by this i mean the screw mechanism of the adjustment needs to be turned several clicks in the clock-wise direction. as an example-if you wabted to move a 1/4min/click scope up one inch, "unscrew" the adjustment mechanisim to move it about 6 clicks above where you want to widn up. so in this example adjust up for 2 1/2", then adjust down 6 clickls. this position will be 1" or 4 clicks above your orginal zero. same goes for th ewindage system. they are all right hand thread, so go "righty-tighty 6 clicks" to your desired impact point.

this goes A LONG WAY to making adjustments consistant and accurate, but i almost never hear anyone who is not a competition shooter saying it.

btw-my favorite scope is my one and only Schmidt & Bender. it has 1cm clicks and i can depend on it like clockwork. It will, damn near every time, move the point of impact anywhere between .079" to .803" for every click all day, every day, juts like clockwaork. BUT-it stays where it is when i screw the caps on way better than any other scope i own or have shot on others' rifles.
 
Posts: 2509 | Location: Kisatchie National Forest, LA | Registered: 20 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
German assembled Zeiss scopes I have owned seemed to move 1 Centimeter per click at 100 meters (.39" adjustments at 110 yards, roughly).

It would not surprise me if Leupold (with their wide international market) have also gone "Metric" without telling us. Not too much difference between 1/4 inch and 1/3" for must hunting uses.

I suspect that you're right. One CM at 100M would equal .3579" at 100 yards. This is pretty close to the amount the Zeiss Conquests I was speaking of appeared to move. It is also close to what I've experienced with Leupolds in the 9X and below range. I do have a couple of 6-18 VX-II's that appear to be close to the .25", but if anything, they are a bit wide of that mark.

By the way, one of the virtues extolled of the old Vari-X Leupolds was that their non-click friction adjustments allowed (thoeretically) infinitely small adjustments that didn't have to comport with 1/4" (or 1/3") jumps. That was one of their selling point when compared against the competitors (which mostly used click adjustments.) All I can say is that "fashion changes".
 
Posts: 13239 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
HOWEVER- all scopes need to be "screwed in" when adjusted.

I usually make a practice of "over adjusting" by a couple of clicks, then coming three click "back", then one click "forward" in order to reach my intended adjustment -- regardless of which direction the adjustment is moving. It appears that you are saying that the "final adjustment" direction should always be in the clockwise direction, regardless of which way you ultimately wish to move the POI?
 
Posts: 13239 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stonecreek:
quote:
HOWEVER- all scopes need to be "screwed in" when adjusted.

I usually make a practice of "over adjusting" by a couple of clicks, then coming three click "back", then one click "forward" in order to reach my intended adjustment -- regardless of which direction the adjustment is moving. It appears that you are saying that the "final adjustment" direction should always be in the clockwise direction, regardless of which way you ultimately wish to move the POI?


That is correct. The turrets need to be screwed "in" for proepr adjustment. So if you are shooting too high and need to adjust the group cenmter down, just screw the turret in/clockwise to move the point of impact down.

if your rifle is shooting 1" below where you want it and have a scope with 1/4" adjustments, "unscrew/turn counter-clockwise" 10 clicks, then screw the turret in 6 clicks. this puts your group center 4 clicks/1" higher than the original group. it has to do with the spring pressure against the erector tube. 6 clicks will do it, but 4 is probably enough. we all did 6 just to be sure.
 
Posts: 2509 | Location: Kisatchie National Forest, LA | Registered: 20 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
When you wish to move the POI in the direction of the clockwise adjustment, do you simply move the prescribed number of clicks without any back-and-forth?

Also, note that not all scopes use the same direction of rotation for direction of POI movement. Even worse, I ran across a cheapie Asian scope a while back (belonged to a friend's son, not mine) which was mismarked as to the direction of rotation for POI movement. Sighting in was a frustrating experience, to say the least.
 
Posts: 13239 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have not "clicked" my Schmidt and Benders for 30 years.
Once installed they have stayed "dead on" for that long.
Have 3 of them. All 1&1/2 X 6 on 7-08, 338 Win Mag and
375 H&H Ack Imp.40 degree.

Good Shooting

Tetonka

DRSS
 
Posts: 295 | Location: Willow City, Texas & Polebridge, Montana | Registered: 12 June 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tetonka:
I have not "clicked" my Schmidt and Benders for 30 years.
Once installed they have stayed "dead on" for that long.
Have 3 of them. All 1&1/2 X 6 on 7-08, 338 Win Mag and
375 H&H Ack Imp.40 degree.

Good Shooting

Tetonka

DRSS
That's great, but it says much more about your rifles than it does the scopes.
 
Posts: 13239 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigB
posted Hide Post
Nightforce are the only ones I have that I click for other than intial zero. They seem excellent.

BigB
 
Posts: 1401 | Location: Northwest Wyoming | Registered: 13 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of D Humbarger
posted Hide Post
VALDADA!



Doug Humbarger
NRA Life member
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72'73.
Yankee Station

Try to look unimportant. Your enemy might be low on ammo.
 
Posts: 8346 | Location: Jennings Louisiana, Arkansas by way of Alabama by way of South Carloina by way of County Antrim Irland by way of Lanarkshire Scotland. | Registered: 02 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My Zeiss ( diavari and Victory) have all measured up,

my Hensoldt is deadly spot on, .1 rad at allt times,

same goes for my PMII 5-25.

Had a leupold mark 4 for a while, sader piece of optics had to hard to find,

backlash in both adjustments and parallax.

If one is looking for the very best,

March/SuB/Nightforce are the three big ones to look at.

/Chris
 
Posts: 978 | Registered: 13 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sam308
posted Hide Post
I bought my first Nightforce in January and it has the most accurate and consistent adjustments of anything I have used. I have always been a Leupold and Nikon guy but Nightforce blows them away.
 
Posts: 344 | Location: Kansas | Registered: 27 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Certainly not a hunting scope, but have an older pristine Unertl 1.5 x 16 which is very dependable either windage or elevation. Definitely old school and very important that you have the two bases separated the right distance to get the .250" adjustment. It's a math thing.
 
Posts: 1328 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 19 January 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Nightforce is the only scope I have used that is consistant when it comes to adjustments. I believe it is the best scope for the money.
 
Posts: 503 | Registered: 27 May 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I hate to say it but the 1/4 inch CLICKS on the Weavers going back to the early 50s were the best adjustments I have used..If those scopes had been more moisture proof they would have still been the best yet! but they did fog most of the time..I have one of the new Weavers in a 2.5X and it seems like a really nice clear scope and has yet to fog..That said I'm a Leupold die hard, and 65 years to back them up, nary a complaint, but I only use scopes to hunt with and am not an optical freak.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 41970 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia