new member
| Thanks that is a good thought. I will check how far through the adjustment range it is. I don't recall having to wind in a lot of adjustment....
Will post what I find. |
| Posts: 6 | Location: Sevenoaks, England | Registered: 10 March 2007 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
new member
| A short update. I sent a rather harsh mail to Swarovski and they now want the scope sent back to Austria. I will probably do this, but will check the mounts once it is off, to make sure nothing else is contributing to this problem. Will keep posting here so there is a clear history of what goes on.
Pat |
| Posts: 6 | Location: Sevenoaks, England | Registered: 10 March 2007 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
new member
| The scope went off to the factory on Friday. The mounts were absolutely solid. According to the factory, the maximum possible error with a scope set to be parallax free at 100 metres, would be 5.6 cm at 300 metres. My error was far worse than that, and I have parallax compensation. Interestingly, the parallax turret could be turned some way past the infinity setting (some reference to Buzz Lightyear seems appropriate here) so I think it may be out of calibration. |
| Posts: 6 | Location: Sevenoaks, England | Registered: 10 March 2007 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|