12 December 2012, 20:14
KathiGoogle to fund unmanned drones to hunt poachers in Africa
http://www.gadling.com/2012/12...-poachers-in-africa/Google To Fund Unmanned Drones To Hunt Poachers In Africa
by Kraig Becker (RSS feed) on Dec 12th 2012 at 8:00AM
As part of their new Global Impact Awards, Internet search giant Google has pledged $5 million to the World Wildlife Fund in an effort to help fight illegal poaching in Africa and Asia. The funds will be used to create a sophisticated data network for tracking the movement of animals and will employ unmanned surveillance drones to hunt poachers in the field.
In their announcement of the grant, Google estimated that the global illegal wildlife trade is worth $7-$10 billion annually. Much of that value is comprised of the sale of ivory tusks harvested from elephants and the horns of rhinos, two animals that could face extinction if poaching is allowed to continue unabated.
Being a technology company, Google of course hopes to use sophisticated equipment to help combat the poachers. In addition to using drones to survey the landscape, the company is helping the WWF to develop new animal tags that are both cheaper and more advanced than what they've used in the past. The new tags would not only be able to track the movement of the creatures but also collect more information on their behavior. They'll even be able to text updates and alerts on the location of the animals directly to the mobile phones of park rangers.
But it is the drones that hold the greatest potential for helping to fight the war against poachers. These tiny aircraft will be remotely piloted and feature a host of onboard technology that could prove useful in stopping the illegal harvesting of animals. With high-definition cameras, infrared sensors and built-in microphones, the aircraft will provide opportunities to observe and react to events taking place on the ground much more quickly than in the past.
Exactly which kind of drone system the WWF will use hasn't been announced and it is likely that they'll go through an evaluation and testing process before they purchase the aircraft. These will be unarmed UAV's, however, so don't look for any missile strikes to take place against the poachers. But then again, considering the Obama administration recently announced that poaching is a threat to U.S. national security interests, who knows exactly who will be in control of the drones over Africa and Asia.
12 December 2012, 20:24
Bill/OregonHave a nephew already involved in this in Africa. He flies Blackhawks for the Air Guard reserve, and drones for private contractors.
12 December 2012, 22:55
LittleJoeThe only thing about the drones that scares me is that one time it will be friendly fire and that will not be good. Meaning I could see a drone taking out a legit group of hunters. I hope I am wrong.
12 December 2012, 23:13
fujotupuquote:
Originally posted by LittleJoe:
The only thing about the drones that scares me is that one time it will be friendly fire and that will not be good. Meaning I could see a drone taking out a legit group of hunters. I hope I am wrong.
N.B:
"These will be unarmed UAV's, however, so don't look for any missile strikes to take place against the poachers".
13 December 2012, 17:22
NakihunterAl they need to do is drop some coloured dust bombs to attract attention to the location & the poachers wil run a mile.
13 December 2012, 18:11
daleWGoogle is anti-hunting.
Under the auspices of using their money and funding to prevent poaching and protect all these African species....how wonderful....the press eats it up and world wide governments approve and join with google. But google's true motive is liberialism and anti hunting...they secretly hate us.
This is how the libs operate.
dale
13 December 2012, 18:36
StonecreekThe grant is to the World Wildlife Fund. This organization has always recognized legitimate sport hunting as a conservation tool and has never, to my knowledge, advocated against legal hunting.
13 December 2012, 19:13
AnotherAZWriterquote:
Originally posted by Stonecreek:
The grant is to the World Wildlife Fund. This organization has always recognized legitimate sport hunting as a conservation tool and has never, to my knowledge, advocated against legal hunting.
Except when they replaced Juan Carlos as president of WWF. That is when we wrote a letter and stopped giving.
14 December 2012, 00:39
Die Ou JagterWill these funds come from the 10 billion they have parked off shore and untaxed.
14 December 2012, 04:24
BaxterBquote:
Will these funds come from the 10 billion they have parked off shore and untaxed.
Hell no...they will start a 'not for profit' and ask for donations... Google is a really scary enterprise in my opinion... once folks get a chunk of money, the influence they wield in the markets of their choice can be staggering...eople like Warren Buffet say the death tax is good to help prevent a plutocracy...bullshit...already have it...slowing heading toward a kakistocracy...