Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Why did you feel it necessary to throw Aaron under the bus? Jeff | |||
|
One of Us |
+1 Bwana. With friends like that.... ____________________________________________ "Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life." Terry Pratchett. | |||
|
One of Us |
I had tried to make it clear that was not my intent. Was that not clear? It has been mentioned many times here, and Aaron has explained the situation to the extent he has likely worn out his fingers. If I have offended him, I do apologize. I think Aaron is a great champion of our sport. I will address it with him on a different channel. I meant to be DSC Member...bad typing skills. Marcus Cady DRSS | |||
|
One of Us |
Why throw Aaron under the bus? It's what some do instead of standing together on our hunting issues. Maybe it helps those who do so to somehow gloss over their own imperfections? Just saying. Larry Sellers SCI(International)Life Member R8 Blaser
| |||
|
One of Us |
Mike you and Abe huh? Didn't realize you and he were best buds??? Some comparison I might add. Larry Sellers SCI(International)Life Member R8 Blaser
| |||
|
One of Us |
Thanks. I agree, it is pretty much spot on. Mike | |||
|
One of Us |
______________________________________________ The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who are bereft of that gift. | |||
|
One of Us |
Larry, I was not trying to throw Aaron under the bus at all. I respect him and what he does. I was merely pointing out the dichotomy. I apologized to Aaron and offered to delete my comment. My post has since been memorialized. I tried to make it clear that I was not attacking Aaron. I just thought it strange that Palmer was convicted by the Internet by having a prior violation. My brother was cited, and convicted, of shooting bullfrogs without a license. Where do we draw the line? I was, in no way, trying to shame Aaron. Hell, I respect Mike Jines and his opinions, but he said Palmer was likely guilty (or there abouts) from the beginning due to the prior conviction. Maybe Mike had forgotten some of the things he learned in law school. I suppose I put things the wrong way. Larry, in fact, I was not trying to attack or put Aaron down, but pointing out what is glaring; the judgment of others with different values. I wish I could be as smooth as KPete with my words. Speaking of, has he also been run off? I suppose I'll be put on the asshole list now by trying to point out the discrepancies. I meant to be DSC Member...bad typing skills. Marcus Cady DRSS | |||
|
One of Us |
There are definitely reading comprehension issues, intentionally or unintentionally, among some on AR. I never said Palmer was guilty . . . in this most recent incident (he certainly was in the prior incident). I have said I will not give him the benefit of the doubt given his prior record. I have said I question his view of proper hunting ethics. I have said I do not view him as a role model or good representative for hunters and hope that younger hunters will not emulate him. I have said I think SCI was not only right in suspending him but should have revoked his membership after his felony plea for lying to game authorities. I have said give him his day in court but his prior conduct coupled with his ethical decisions in this instance make him someone I do not care to be aligned with. That is what I have said . . . and now said again. If you happen to feel Palmer got a raw deal, that hunters should stand with Palmer, that SCI should have stood shoulder to shoulder with Palmer, that Palmer's conduct is defensible or excusable, that his prior hunting and fishing law violations are irrelevant, that so long as what Palmer did was legal that settles the issue, I might suggest you consider whether you are part of the problem and not part of the solution to saving hunting long term. Mike | |||
|
One of Us |
You are correct, there are some reading comprehension issues here on AR. As stated, I don't read through all the AR drivel as I would pleadings. I apologize for saying you thought he was "guilty (or there abouts)". However, I never said I was one to stand next to him in our fight for our rights. I don't want to hang our rights on Dr. Palmer, Nugent, or the others. I don't think they are good representatives of our sport. I do feel sorry Dr. Palmer lost his business due to the kneejerk reaction of the anti-hunting faction. My issue is that he was judged guilty by the Zim and Anti crowd/media, and some here, before any facts were discovered. I had posted about there being more to the story and let's what to see what shakes out. I never said I stood shoulder to shoulder with Dr. Palmer, or that we, as hunters, should. If you recall, the Rules of Evidence, take a look at Rule 404(b). It is not relevant in the internet court, but please think about the all the outrage at the initial kill of "Cecil," but where do you find the retractions? Yes, they are on the back page, if at all. What about the next hunter who gets caught in Zim with what he thought was a legal trophy? Some may think I have been posting as an antagonist here, but I'm merely trying to point out the differences. Palmer had been convicted of a prior charge (I still, as stated previously, question his DDS license or whether he could own firearms), but this was a bowhunt. No, he is not an ideal "hero" for the hunting community. I had clients who were not "perfect" to protect the deer breeders in the state. I still fought the AG in Austin as a wet behind the ears lawyer and lost, but I didn't want to lose any rights for all of us, regardless of ideals. Hell, I just became more of an asshole on the forum for defending deer breeder rights. Thanks to those that saved the "Three Amigos." Marcus Cady I meant to be DSC Member...bad typing skills. Marcus Cady DRSS | |||
|
One of Us |
If you are adamant hunting is not closing down in Africa , I suggest you look at the SCI Safari Magazine publication 2001 -2010 , then look at 2011 to this last edition - count the number of BIG GAME adverts and articles , then look at the donations - these two aspects generaly are a reflection of the status of hunting and confidence index. The single biggest indicator of the status of big game hunting in Africa is the SCI donation program - The October issue does not reflect one big game donation , and you will have to look realy hard to find any eye catching adds. Even if we deduct the reason that SCI is failing the hunting industry outside of North America , and exhibitors are tired of their treatment at the hands of the " inner circle of back slappers ", the confidence is at an all time low. The cause of this is the strangle hold that africa is getting from politicians and the economic ripple affect of the anti hunter pressure groups. The only 2 countries that will survive the next decade is Namibia and South Africa as hunting is now on private land. In the future free range DG will also be hunted , but it will never replace east africa and the other wild countries. Cecil , Blood Lions , Malapati Elephant are the three nails in the coffin , our lack of ability to clean up , present a clean image , acknowledge all is not right in the industry , lack of cohesion , fragmented effort , SCI and DSC lack of vision are the coffin bearers - the anti hunters are waiting for the church bell to put us in the ground . | |||
|
One of Us |
DSC Life Member HSC Life Member NRA Life Member SCI RMEF | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia