THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
dangerous game shooting angles
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
this site shows percentages of kills on shot placements.. http://www.alphatrilogy.com/06...to-shoot-a-bear.html. Lets forget that its on a bear for the moment. Do you belive they are generally correct,not exact of course, or are they totatally misconsieved.. I would like to take into account the heat of the moment, moveing target etc. It looks to me like the frontal and raking shots percentages are so low due to poor pennetration and low bullet mass? The area could be improved with more concentration to the shoulder and hips? Also why in the top 30 percent frontal shot couldnt you also shoot at the snout?.. thanks dave


hunter, blackpowder shooter, photographer, gemology, trap shooter,duck hunter,elk, deer, etc..
 
Posts: 249 | Location: central montana | Registered: 17 June 2004Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
I am afraid this is no different than any drawing showing what will and will not kill an animal.

They talk in absolute terms, even with percentages shown.

In my experience, the angle is really immaterial as long as one has the right rifle and caliber.

I have shot buffalo from every conceivable angle, and had no problems killing them.

I do use bullets that will penetrate a buffalo from one end to the other.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69288 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
ya - but you have walter backing you up Big Grin Eeker
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
I am afraid this is no different than any drawing showing what will and will not kill an animal.

They talk in absolute terms, even with percentages shown.

In my experience, the angle is really immaterial as long as one has the right rifle and caliber.

I have shot buffalo from every conceivable angle, and had no problems killing them.

I do use bullets that will penetrate a buffalo from one end to the other.




I agree 100%. As long as the bullet goes through a vital area, it does not matter from what "direction" it came from.

I also believe that too, soft a bullet will cause you more problems in the long run, than a bullet that is too hard.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It appears the diagram is calling out the percentage of the vital area that is exposed, rather than giving some estimate of the odds of killing the animal if shot at that angle.

As it's been said many times, if you have the right rifle and bullet, shot placement is what counts. This chart is just showing you how careful you need to be when it comes to shot placement.
 
Posts: 257 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: 18 July 2008Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
I am sure some of you might remember Hallamor's "payline" drawings.

That was one of those really outlandish ideas, which defied any logical explanations to it.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69288 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: