THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Penetration of 416 remington
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Here are some photos of a barnes banded solid shot from a 416 remington, recovered from buffalo. One of those two fired as a back up shot on a facing away buffalo penetrated from infront of the rear right leg and was found infront of the front left leg on a facing away buffalo. Thats a whole lot of penetration.





Arjun Reddy
www.huntersnetworks.com
 
Posts: 2585 | Location: New York, USA | Registered: 13 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal pappas
posted Hide Post
They look just like the BBS fired from my .600 nitro--no distortion. They seem to work very well but are non traditional in form or function. For a solid mono bullet, are there any better?
Cal


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
 
Posts: 7281 | Location: Willow, Alaska | Registered: 29 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of safari-lawyer
posted Hide Post
I've fired the same on several buffalo. I typically get a pass through on a side shot and stem to stern penetration (no pass through) on frontal and Texas heart shots.

Shot the same into an elephant's ear hole . . . lacked about two inches being a pass through.

Same for hippo head shot . . . almost passed through.


Will J. Parks, III
 
Posts: 2989 | Location: Alabama USA | Registered: 09 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of LionHunter
posted Hide Post
Since the advent of premium soft points, solids have no longer been required on Cape Buff.

After using the Swift A-Frame for years and then experiencing a problem with their 500gr .458 bullet, I've switched to the CEB BBW#13 NonCon. SIL used it from a .416Rem on a chest heart shot of a Buff two months ago with dramatic effect. After the petals shear, what remains is a straight penetrating solid base. Truely the next generation of bullets, IMO.


Mike
______________
DSC
DRSS (again)
SCI Life
NRA Life
Sables Life
Mzuri
IPHA

"To be a Marine is enough."
 
Posts: 3577 | Location: Silicon Valley | Registered: 19 November 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
After the petals shear, what remains is a straight penetrating solid base. Truely the next generation of bullets, IMO.[/QUOTE


Is that not what the old CT Failsafe bullet did and was critized for it??


NRA Life Member, ILL Rifle Assoc Life Member, Navy
 
Posts: 2300 | Location: Monee, Ill. USA | Registered: 11 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of LionHunter
posted Hide Post
raamw -

Go to the Big Bores forum and read the 260 pages of the Terminal Bullet Performance thread, it is saved as the top entry, and all your questions will be answered.


Mike
______________
DSC
DRSS (again)
SCI Life
NRA Life
Sables Life
Mzuri
IPHA

"To be a Marine is enough."
 
Posts: 3577 | Location: Silicon Valley | Registered: 19 November 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I know the Failsafe was not made for the 416 but I have used then in 375 and had favorable results on moose. I like the ability of shedding the pedals and turning into a solid, simple more penetration more damage. I have always believed in penetration and use more gun than what is generally thought of acceptable since only under kill is criticized never over kill.


NRA Life Member, ILL Rifle Assoc Life Member, Navy
 
Posts: 2300 | Location: Monee, Ill. USA | Registered: 11 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LionHunter:
Since the advent of premium soft points, solids have no longer been required on Cape Buff.


I agree with that I used the solids as a back up on one buffalo and a finishing shot on another, which was down with a 416 A frame as the first shot.
 
Posts: 2585 | Location: New York, USA | Registered: 13 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by reddy375:
Here are some photos of a barnes banded solid shot from a 416 remington, recovered from buffalo. One of those two fired as a back up shot on a facing away buffalo penetrated from infront of the rear right leg and was found infront of the front left leg on a facing away buffalo. Thats a whole lot of penetration.





Arjun Reddy
www.huntersnetworks.com



What is the big deal? I have made the exact same shot on a buffalo bull with a Woodleigh soft and it was found under the skin after penetrating the shoulder bone and I suspect it did a lot more damage on its way then the solid did.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bwana Nderobo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Since the advent of premium soft points, solids have no longer been required on Cape Buff.



I had two A Frames against the offside skin on a large Zambian Buffalo. 95% weight retention, perfect performance, and my PH had me leave all the solids in the box. with the exception of Elephants, you simply don't need them in a .416 Remington. Love that effing cartridge!


Phil Massaro
President, Massaro Ballistic Laboratories, LLC
NRA Life Member
B&C Member
www.mblammo.com

Hunt Reports- Zambia 2011
http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/1481089261

"Two kinds of people in this world, those of us with loaded guns, and those of us who dig. You dig."
 
Posts: 441 | Location: New Baltimore, NY | Registered: 14 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:



What is the big deal? I have made the exact same shot on a buffalo bull with a Woodleigh soft and it was found under the skin after penetrating the shoulder bone and I suspect it did a lot more damage on its way then the solid did.

465H&H


@465
Your experience shows the problem of comparing animal to animal. Every trajectory is unique and depends on what is encountered inside the animal.

I just recovered a 350 grain TSX (416 Rigby) from the neck of a buffalo shot in the face, off-center toward and under its left eye. Only 63% of the bullet remained and it was squashed and bulged in the head, after having dropped its petals. It was a very traumatized TSX. It was shot at over 2800 fps and obviously experienced some extreme trauma in its short terminal trajectory. The buffalo dropped on the spot even though the brain was not hit, nor the spine. But 5500 ftlbs of impact energy (6200 ftlb muzzle) was transferred by that bullet.
I'm glad I was not using a smaller calibre or light load.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 416Tanzan:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:



What is the big deal? I have made the exact same shot on a buffalo bull with a Woodleigh soft and it was found under the skin after penetrating the shoulder bone and I suspect it did a lot more damage on its way then the solid did.

465H&H


@465
Your experience shows the problem of comparing animal to animal. Every trajectory is unique and depends on what is encountered inside the animal.

I just recovered a 350 grain TSX (416 Rigby) from the neck of a buffalo shot in the face, off-center toward and under its left eye. Only 63% of the bullet remained and it was squashed and bulged in the head, after having dropped its petals. It was a very traumatized TSX. It was shot at over 2800 fps and obviously experienced some extreme trauma in its short terminal trajectory. The buffalo dropped on the spot even though the brain was not hit, nor the spine. But 5500 ftlbs of impact energy (6200 ftlb muzzle) was transferred by that bullet.
I'm glad I was not using a smaller calibre or light load.


So was that a charge you stopped? What was the range? If close 2800 fps into the skull would be a tough test for any bullet.
 
Posts: 424 | Location: Australia | Registered: 11 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Pretty similar to a Nosler Partition. The newer versions in 375 caliber and up retain close to 80% on their weight after shedding the front core. They probably still have a larger frontal area remaining that the shank however I believe I have some data Michael did for me in 416 and the NP's actually penetrated deeper in a 400 gr through his medium than any other soft. Not by much (1-2") but they were the deepest penetrator.
Seems like we have come full circle...
 
Posts: 3256 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 January 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
While I have shot a pile of both small and large beasts with my .416, passthrough potential using solids increases significantly. You just have to be more patient and understand that you may have to pass on non-optimal shooting opportunities.

Unless ele is on the menu or you’re the PH backing up the client, solids would not be my first choice for .375 or .416.


___________________

Just Remember, We ALL Told You So.
 
Posts: 22445 | Location: Occupying Little Minds Rent Free | Registered: 04 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eezridr:
Pretty similar to a Nosler Partition. The newer versions in 375 caliber and up retain close to 80% on their weight after shedding the front core. They probably still have a larger frontal area remaining that the shank however I believe I have some data Michael did for me in 416 and the NP's actually penetrated deeper in a 400 gr through his medium than any other soft. Not by much (1-2") but they were the deepest penetrator.
Seems like we have come full circle...


I have also seen tests in ballistic gelatin where 160 grain Nosler Partitions from a 280 AI and a 180 grain NP from a 300 Win out penetrated similar weight Barnes TSXs.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks! I'll remember that on my next gelatin hunt!! Big Grin


A day spent in the bush is a day added to your life
Hunt Australia - Website
Hunt Australia - Facebook
Hunt Australia - TV


 
Posts: 4456 | Location: Australia | Registered: 23 January 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Graham:
Thanks! I'll remember that on my next gelatin hunt!! Big Grin


But your safe if your are hunting wet pack paper and using the TSX!

dancing

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
While I generally consider myself old-fashioned, I don't think solids are the best choice for buffalo -- at least not first shot and perhaps not for follow-ups. Too much chance -- a certainty on a broadside -- for a pass through. In usual cover, you may not know for sure what is behind -- or you may know and it's bad -- no shot in either case. Not so with a soft.

That said, I love the .416 and that looks like a great solid -- for their proper and intended use -- these days. Thanks for the info.
 
Posts: 10490 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 26 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Don_G
posted Hide Post
If you want to get controlled penetration, North Fork softs are hard to beat.

These are hard to beat in a herd situation. They will NOT exit the offside hide of a Cape Buffalo. They do hit the offside hide. Hard to argue with given today's trophy costs.


Don_G

...from Texas, by way of Mason, Ohio and Aurora, Colorado!
 
Posts: 1645 | Location: Elizabeth, Colorado | Registered: 13 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Dead Eye
posted Hide Post

These are some 400 DGS solids from a 416 Rigby recovered from a buf. First one enetered the shoulder and was recovered in the hip. The second one entered 10" below the tail and was recovered in the rumen. Both shots were 40 yrds and were non-vital requiring more gunfire. More penetration apparently isnt a substitute for piss poor shooting...
 
Posts: 395 | Location: Canada | Registered: 06 March 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Antlers
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Graham:
Thanks! I'll remember that on my next gelatin hunt!! Big Grin


yuck


Antlers
Double Rifle Shooters Society
Heym 450/400 3"
 
Posts: 1990 | Location: AL | Registered: 13 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 338User:
quote:
Originally posted by 416Tanzan:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:



What is the big deal? I have made the exact same shot on a buffalo bull with a Woodleigh soft and it was found under the skin after penetrating the shoulder bone and I suspect it did a lot more damage on its way then the solid did.

465H&H


@465
Your experience shows the problem of comparing animal to animal. Every trajectory is unique and depends on what is encountered inside the animal.

I just recovered a 350 grain TSX (416 Rigby) from the neck of a buffalo shot in the face, off-center toward and under its left eye. Only 63% of the bullet remained and it was squashed and bulged in the head, after having dropped its petals. It was a very traumatized TSX. It was shot at over 2800 fps and obviously experienced some extreme trauma in its short terminal trajectory. The buffalo dropped on the spot even though the brain was not hit, nor the spine. But 5500 ftlbs of impact energy (6200 ftlb muzzle) was transferred by that bullet.
I'm glad I was not using a smaller calibre or light load.


So was that a charge you stopped? What was the range? If close 2800 fps into the skull would be a tough test for any bullet.


No, it was just the first shot presented after a 10 minute wait and stand off. The buffalo was hidden for the most part and finally extended his head past a tree and turned it towards me at 70 yards. The wind had been in spurts and was unstable from the left, so finally it was a decision to call that the best and doable shot and to take it. I had a small tree branch stump projection as a rest and the shot felt solid and secure. It just ended up an inch or so lower than intended. I was afraid of going too high, not wanting to go over the brain or eyelevel. So I ended up going under the brain.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Don_G:
If you want to get controlled penetration, North Fork softs are hard to beat.

These are hard to beat in a herd situation. They will NOT exit the offside hide of a Cape Buffalo. They do hit the offside hide. Hard to argue with given today's trophy costs.


Agree with the north forks. 430 grain softs in .416 RM on 2 buffalo perfect performance through shoulder bone, double lung lodged in offside ribcage. You can really hear them smack. Mine was a one shot kill and the other the finisher for the wife who used a .404. The PH's were very impressed with the bullets and the .416. It hit audibly harder than the 404 and had more dramatice results. Gave all my solids to the PHWink Those 430 north for flat points looked nasty wish I got to use them lol


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2861 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There was quite a bit of ink a few years back about the "discovery" that flat nose bullets penetrated better than round nose bullets. It seems that the flat nose created some sort of shock wave that reduces the surface tension and resistance of the tissue, allowing the bullet to penetrate deeper. This advantage now seems to have been neutralized by the discovery that flat nosed bullets do not always feed well in bolt guns. I know of one recent near-disaster on ele that was attributed to a jammed cartridge with a flat nosed solid. For what it's worth, the Barnes .375 300 gr. solids I used 20 years ago were round nosed, the ones I bought 5 years ago were flat nosed, and the ones I bought this year were round nosed.
 
Posts: 427 | Registered: 13 June 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Will
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by raamw:
After the petals shear, what remains is a straight penetrating solid base. Truely the next generation of bullets, IMO.[/QUOTE


Is that not what the old CT Failsafe bullet did and was critized for it??


All them darn new inventions. That's what Nosler have been doing for 50 years. And seems to be imitated year and year for 50 years. Smiler


-------------------------------
Will Stewart / Once you've been amongst them, there is no such thing as too much gun.
---------------------------------------
and, God Bless John Wayne.

NRA Benefactor Member, GOA, N.A.G.R.
_________________________

"Elephant and Elephant Guns" $99 shipped
“Hunting Africa's Dangerous Game" $20 shipped.

red.dirt.elephant@gmail.com
_________________________

Hoping to wind up where elephant hunters go.
 
Posts: 19380 | Location: Ocala Flats | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Will
posted Hide Post
quote:
These are some 400 DGS solids from a 416 Rigby recovered from a buf. First one enetered the shoulder and was recovered in the hip. The second one entered 10" below the tail and was recovered in the rumen. Both shots were 40 yrds and were non-vital requiring more gunfire. More penetration apparently isnt a substitute for piss poor shooting...


This is the same old stuff about solids. Solids do no kill as fast as softs.

You shoot a buff with solids, and it does not go down, so you have to shoot it again with another solid, and another, and ....

Damn, those are tuff.

Of course, you could have killed it with one soft.

Just another one of those illogical African hunting traditions. Smiler


-------------------------------
Will Stewart / Once you've been amongst them, there is no such thing as too much gun.
---------------------------------------
and, God Bless John Wayne.

NRA Benefactor Member, GOA, N.A.G.R.
_________________________

"Elephant and Elephant Guns" $99 shipped
“Hunting Africa's Dangerous Game" $20 shipped.

red.dirt.elephant@gmail.com
_________________________

Hoping to wind up where elephant hunters go.
 
Posts: 19380 | Location: Ocala Flats | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: