The Accurate Reloading Forums
Some thoughts on DGR's

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1411043/m/8351025

05 November 2001, 04:09
raamw
Some thoughts on DGR's
Here is an interesting article that was posted on the Alaska Hunting Forum regarding
dependable weapons and removal magazines, the out come was good fortunately.
I removed the authors name. But it was in reference to an individual who was asking
what type of gun would be recommended for Brown Bear.

You know this usually stirs up a hornet's nest! Any way I use a Brno (CZ 602) in .458
Win. Magnum, but the .375 Ultra Mag is a nice cartridge. Personally, I might use it if it was chambered for a Brno or a Mod. 70 Winchester since I much prefer Mauser type actions, and this is where the controversy begins. My last bear hunter this year put down a nice bear with the lowly .338 Win. Mag., but the interesting thing was the way the stainless Remington 700 worked during the five days we were together. One day I noticed his bolt had fallen open and rounds had fallen onto the ground while he packed the thing on his shoulder (I never use slings in real bear country), and then, when the moment
of truth came and the bear was in his sights the rifle failed to fire! No malfunctioning
ammo, the trigger was squeezed and nothing! And no the safety was not on. Fortunately my hunter had enough composure left that he worked another round into the chamber and the second time the rifle actually fired. Then the floorplate came flying open and dumped
the rest of his ammo onto the ground. The point to all of this is simply it doesn't matter what the caliber is if it doesn't
send a bullet when the trigger is squeezed. Consider all your options before you buy,
and shoot it a lot, then leave it out in the rain for a week to see how it handles the weather.

05 November 2001, 04:35
Atkinson
That is a touchy subject around here

Your experience parallels mine however, I'm a control feed fan of the highest order, but I have reached a point of just letting the decedents learn the hard way...

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

05 November 2001, 06:24
DB Bill
Ray.....I don't think the post mentioned a faillure to feed or extract just a failure to work like a rifle should ....keep it's ammo in the magazine and go "bang" when it should. Do you think this never happened to a Mauser of Model 70? What we have is a shooter who didn't check out his rifle before he went on a trip....how many rifles with floorplates do you see taped shut in the bush...... a lot, right! Are they are Model 700s?
05 November 2001, 10:22
500grains
I had a screw installed in the floorplate of my Win M70 in .585 so that I don't need to worry about the latch holding. But I guess the screw could back out.
05 November 2001, 11:28
Will
All the action types are subject to problems. It seems the guy just found a few that should have been discovered; but I wouldn't shoot the guy for it!!

Also the floorplates serve a function(s). Sometimes opening the floorplate is the only way to overcome a jammmed cartridge. I personally don't want to be without a functioning floorplate.

05 November 2001, 12:48
Atkinson
DB,
Like I said to each his own, I'll let you choose your own fate... I,m quite zealous over my choice of a control feed, I'll admit that. Allways will be.

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

05 November 2001, 13:23
<jagtip>
A man who will take to the field after dangerous game,without having tested his weapon thoroughly is,simply put,a fool.
06 November 2001, 08:18
<rwj>
The problem described above with the M700 not shooting sounds like someone was screwing around with the trigger/cocking mechanism resulting in the gun not cocking..a situation where the shooter has to work the action one or more times until it does cock, which lets it fire. This has nothing to do with the rifle or the action itself, and has everything to do with someone modifying the trigger/cocking system, which can be done on any rifle. A person can screw up any rifle with a real small screw driver in the comfort of his or her own home.

On the matter of CRF or not CRF, what do you guys think about ForrestB's post a couple of weeks ago on his custom Mauser locking up on him earlier this year resulting in his nephew getting batted around by ForrestB's wounded buffalo? He said his Mauser rifle and his nephew's M70 CFR rifle both would lock up when the action was worked rapidly simulating hunting conditions, simulating conditions that locked his rifle up with a buffalo close by. I have tried to get my Weatherby's (.416&.378) to lock up and I can't get them to do it (which makes me happy).

Robert Jobson

06 November 2001, 11:07
500grains
I know a guy with a M700 that he has hunted with only about 10 times. He bought it new. This year when aiming at a game animal, the rifle went CLICK! He hasn't taken it to a gunsmith for diagnosis yet.
06 November 2001, 11:20
DB Bill
You know if it wasn't a CRF it may not have chambered a round and the click could have been an empty chamber...got to be careful.
06 November 2001, 12:04
Paul H
Seems this thread could be tied into the custom makers thread.

Can we agree that while the factories chamber some of their bolt guns in rounds suitable for use on dangerous game, that their rifles come up short? Same can be said for the offerings of their "custom" shops.

A dangerous game rifle is one assembled to function reliably under adverse conditions. Plain and simple. Now making a gun do that is a time consuming task, that requires a real gunsmith, who is willing to put the time in to do the work.

Control feed or push feed has nothing to do with it, though, if one understands the issues involved in a DGR, the choice of parent action is clear.


06 November 2001, 12:12
Mike375
I think the most reliable feeding comes from a push feed with vertical stack magazine.

Several years ago I use to do the weekend range duty at a large rifle range. Shooters with various CRFs invariably had the most problems, with converted Mausers being the worst offenders.

I think CRF needs to be "more right" than a push feed to function reliably.

To me, the best thing about CRF is it is nicer to use, even down to running rounds through the magazine.

I also like CRF when we spotlight shoot because I can have the bolt about 2/3rds closed with the round in the extractor.

What I don't like is that you can't have your rifles set upso that barrels can be changed between actions unless the extractor slot is cut all the way around.

I also like having CRF in calibers like 300 and 375 H&H just so I can annoy DB Bill

Mike


06 November 2001, 12:36
DB Bill
Mike......you guys don't annoy me.....really. I always believe that everyone should be allowed to pick whatever they like in the selection of tools whether it is wooden or fiberglass stocks, stainless or chrome-moly actions and barrels, 20" or 26" barrels, belted or non-belted cases (and short or long), Leupold or European glass, etc etc etc. The thing that is ONLY SLIGHTLY ANNOYING are those who believe "one size fits all" and they and they alone know what that "size" is.

For me, my rifles are working rifles designed to be powerful, accurate, portable and easy to maintain....I prefer rifles that max out at about 8 1/2 pounds for the more powerful and 7 1/2 lbs for the smaller, I like Swarovski optics, stainless steel barrels (23" or 24"), short actions, McMillan stocks and I like and 2 1/2 lb triggers. Not for everyone but just right for me. PS...my actions aren't CRF but they do have a dual ejector/extractor system.


06 November 2001, 13:54
p dog shooter
I borrowed I 03 A3 to a fellow he was always losing rounds as he kept the safety in the middle position and had it slung on his shoulder.I prefer control feeds myself but having a person that knows what is going on helps more then the type of action.
06 November 2001, 15:56
<allen day>
I'll take a good, well-adjusted, controlled-feed bolt-gun any day of the week for any big game hunting purpose.

Most of the push-feed actions were designed to save production costs, but they've been sold to the consumer under the guise of greater strength, greater safety, and greater accuracy. I don't buy into any of these supposed advantages for big game hunting purposes.

There are all sorts of places to save money, but to do so by selecting some sort push-feed bolt action for use on dangerous game is reverse economy, and might just prove to be a bitter bargain in my opinion.

AD

06 November 2001, 16:39
DB Bill
I wonder what all the lefties did before Winchester started making left-handed rifles. Poor Craig Boddington had to get by for years with a Remington converted to the port-side .... good thing he was a Marine or I'm sure he would never have survived...he must have had a bayonet mounted for those time his rifle would feed.;p ;p
06 November 2001, 17:56
Mike375
DB Bill,

From Allen's post:

I'll take a good, well-adjusted, controlled-feed bolt-gun

Unfortunately, most CRFs don't meet the "well adjusted"

If you frequent any military forums, you will see that 303 SMLE comes in as number 1 and of course it was a push feed.

If you actually use a 303 SMLE as compared to a M98 you will see the difference.

The M98 must be one of the few rifles made to deal with overloads in a rifle that would only shoot military ammo.

In my opinion the CRF is a typical over engineered European product.

Works great if it is "well adjusted".

I like CRF for reasons I explained above. However, reliability of feeding would not be a reason.

An interesting test that some might like to do. Place a cartridge in the magazine and with the rifle pointed down and bolt fully drawn back, belt the bolt closed with a rubber mallet with both CRF and push feed.

When you do it, make sure the case rims are in good condition for the CRF Also make sure your particular rifle has appropriate clearance between the extractor and bolt face.

Something else I should point out. Current Model 70s can all be made to double feed. I can do it everytime.

This occurs because of the bolt stop and ejector position Winchester use. That is, you expose the head of the case in the magazine before the ejector has worked on the extracted case.

Mike

[This message has been edited by Mike375 (edited 11-06-2001).]

06 November 2001, 19:24
DB Bill
Mike375...we both have too much time on our hands.
06 November 2001, 19:36
Mike375
DB Bill,

You could be right. What is your excuse

Mike

07 November 2001, 03:53
Jim in Idaho
quote:
Originally posted by DB Bill:
I wonder what all the lefties did before Winchester started making left-handed rifles.

Well, knowing that we would be in a world of hurt if we tried to reload our left handed Remingtons, we just aimed true and killed 'em with the first shot!

What do you right handers do?

07 November 2001, 08:29
Atkinson
DB,
Boddington used the push feeds out of necessity and proclaimed them fine, but when he recently had his two big game rifles built he chose the Mauser actions converted to left hand, He's not stupid, just a little slow you'll come around to one of these days, all DG hunters do sooooner or later

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

07 November 2001, 12:38
Paul H
As I've said many times before, the CRF is a superb design. Now, if the monkeys at the factory can't build a gun the way it is designed, that is a relection on the monkeys, not the designer.

As I also stated previously in this thread, the factories do not produce dangerous game rifles, they simply chamber their offerings for dangerous game rounds.

If one is going to build a DGR, they will start with a CRF action, and then procede to build a DGR, as thats the only way to get one. Oh, and it won'd be build by Bubba's Gun's under the shadetree either