:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/w...d-sickening-11534618

Just happened to read that a bit ago. Another one sided article!

ya!


GWB

More pandering to the urban mob. Gotta love those warm and fuzzy animals to extinction.

never read a UK paper about hunting.

The article is poorly done and its title does not reflect the name of the film. After doing some research I believe they are talking about this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPPlH_yKgr4

They have "missed" (deliberately) the whole point of the film, and this shows what is wrong with the media today. There is no longer any news. Only opinions and spin

quote:

They have "missed" (deliberately) the whole point of the film, and this shows what is wrong with the media today. There is no longer any news. Only opinions and spin

It is just not the news media, it is a fundamental change in humans that has been taking place for decades as a whole, the majority of humans have became so far removed from the Natural World that they really have no comprehensive idea of the natural world or the role humans play in it.

The first thing those people need to understand is, which animals are truly endangered, and why!

The ethical hunter is the truly endangered wildlife's friend. The game departments sets the number of animals that are surplus to the habitat where they live, and the surplus is all that is allowed to both protect the species as well as his habitat. This doesn't only protect the continued viability of the animal hunted, but the habitat the non-game animals also depend on the habitat.

In the case of Africa, the national parks are surrounded by vast hunting concessions that work as a buffer zone that guards the borders of the national parks from poachers who kill everything they see That is eatable or produce illegal sale for profit with no regard to the age or the long time existence of any animal species.

The hunting outfitters are sold permits for the surplus for the area where they have also paid the gov for the concession as well. The safari companies also keep the poachers out of the area, and destroy the poacher's traps and snares witch do not discriminate as to age or species, regardless of the rareness or endangered status of any animal.

The so-called wildlife protectors, calling them selves the savior of all animals wanting all hunting stopped are the worse enemy wildlife has simply because they do not understand game management. Even the most uneducated farmer knows that if you flood your land with more livestock that the land will support the livestock will die of starvation, but the land will be stripped for everything that depends on that land for food and shelter. Overpopulation of any species like elephant, which are very hard on the habitat, will ruin the habitat for all other animals that depend on the land for their existences as well.

As long as the number of any species is over balanced to the terrain the best thing for everything depending on that habitat is to remove the surplus to guarantee the long term viability of all who use the habitat.

The anti hunter is the worse enemy all wildlife has, and I'm not saying they are purposefully endangering wild life but simply do not know better. Other people who also do not know better, unfortunately, listen to them and repeat their ignorance.
.....................................................

Great post Mac. We need to say that to critics in places such as social media. They do not get the other side of the story.

We should have headlines that read,

"SICKINING BLOODLUST OF THE HAMBURGER, STEAK, CHICKEN, LAMB AND BACON EATERS!"

And plaster that all over the cities.

Not much difference between when anyone commits a crime with a gun, we have everyone screaming BAN THE GUNS!


When someone uses a car or truck, all we hear is deathly silence!