THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  African Big Game Hunting    One last call (for me anyway) for the better choice. 470 or 500?

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
One last call (for me anyway) for the better choice. 470 or 500?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Wanted to post it in the hunting context and not just from a strictly double rifle SHOOTER point of view. It's getting down to the wire. I have two double rifles, a 470NE and a 500NE, coming this summer to hunt buffalo in late '07 or in '08. What do all you experienced hunters think about which is the better of the two as a DG DR caliber? All topics open; price and availability of ammo, recoil and follow up speed, weight. But I really want hear if there IS a better killer or a more accurate or flatter shooter etc.

Thx, David
 
Posts: 1083 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 05 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Use Enough Gun
posted Hide Post
The .470 is the most popular and I believe easier to get ammo. The .500 carries more wallop, both in recoil and in energy. I really like the .470, and that's why I own one in a double rifle and I have killed elephant and cape buffalo with it.
 
Posts: 18583 | Registered: 04 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If you can shoot it well, the .500 is clearly a better DG stopper. Accuracy, trajectory and ammo price are irrelevant. Ammo for either is not likely to be available in Africa, so don't worry too much about that. Famous elephant hunter Sten Cedegren explains his view of the .500 being the better caliber on Buzz Charlton's elephant hunting video.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of H T
posted Hide Post
CoolEither one is a great choice, so you won't go wrong, no matter your pick. I debated a long time and finally chose the 470 for my double. Ammo availability (over here) was the main consideration. Recoil kind of matters too.

I would suggest you shoot both at 50 yard targets, offhand and with relatively quick follow up reloading/firing again so you get off 4 shots. Whichever shoots the best in that scenario is the one I would take, and no second guessing after that.
 
Posts: 742 | Location: Kerrville, TX | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ROSCOE
posted Hide Post
This topic seems to be like the 270 VS 30-06 debate....lots of opinions. I don't think you can go wrong with either of your choices. I have never owened a 500 but believe it to be a fine caliber. The 470 wins in my opinion simply because there are a lot of options out there in terms of brass and bullets...and resale value will no doubt be higher. If none of that matters and you want a big bore double...go with the 500.


******************************************************************
R. Lee Ermey: "The deadliest weapon in the world is a Marine and his rifle."
******************************************************************
We're going to be "gifted" with a health care plan we are forced to purchase and fined if we don't, Which purportedly covers at least ten million more people, without adding a single new doctor, but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents, written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that didn't read it but exempted themselves from it, and signed by a President, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, for which we'll be taxed for four years before any benefits take effect, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that's broke!!!!! 'What the hell could possibly go wrong?'
 
Posts: 2122 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I guess I'm looking to hear from those who have hunted with both. One PH I spoke with said that certainly the 470 is outstanding but, unknown to him as to why, the 500 was a better killer. Couldn't really figure how an increase of .035" and 70 grains, translating into 12% more energy, produced such a substantial increase in wallop!
 
Posts: 1083 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 05 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The .500, & I don't even own one, but I've shot both. The .500 is slightly better.


____________________________

.470 & 9.3X74R Chapuis'
Tikka O/U 9.3X74R
Searcy Classics 450/.400 3" & .577
C&H .375 2 1/2"
Krieghoff .500 NE
Member Dallas Safari Club
 
Posts: 1587 | Location: Eleanor, West Virginia (USA) | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I own and have hunted with both. Ammo is no problem with either as I handload and cost is about the same. I am slightly biased as the .500 NE saved my bacon on the only buffalo charge I have had to deal with. I have shot buffalo and elephant with each caliber. Make no mistake, both calibers hit hard, but the .500NE seems to really shake 'em up to the point that there is noticeable difference. For general carry I tend to like the .470 as the gun is so nicely ballanced and it fits me to a tee. The .500 is almost a pound heavier and that can be a pain at times, but I carry both guns with a 2" canvas sling which I remove when things are about to happen. But if I am after elephant or if I find myself in a situation that could get ugly, it is sure comforting having a couple of big honkin' .510", 570gr. bullets to throw at the problem. As far as recoil is concerned, hell, both guns kick! As has been said ad-nausium, you won't feel the recoil, nor hear the report when shooting at game. I load both with RL 15 and when loaded with this powder, I would estimate the difference between the two is about 10-15%. If you use the slower powders, ie. H-4813, the felt recoil is considerably harsher. This is especially true with the .500NE. I hope this helps some. I have tried to keep my comments as objective as possible.

Geronimo
 
Posts: 816 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 14 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of gumboot458
posted Hide Post
.......As someone who is edjucateing himself about doubles ,possibly for African animals..I appreciate all the objective comments


.If it can,t be grown , its gotta be mined ....
 
Posts: 3445 | Location: Copper River Valley , Prudhoe Bay , and other interesting locales | Registered: 19 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Totally objective, Geronimo, much appreciated. Your report echos that of the afore mentioned PH's comments. Similar to this topic, I was speaking with another PH about 375 H&H vs 416 Rigby. Observations were essentially the same. The 375 kills buff and kills 'em good, but the Rigby really whacks 'em!
 
Posts: 1083 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 05 December 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  African Big Game Hunting    One last call (for me anyway) for the better choice. 470 or 500?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: