THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  African Big Game Hunting    THE ONLY GOOD POACHER IS A DEAD POACHER
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
THE ONLY GOOD POACHER IS A DEAD POACHER
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Lorenzo
posted Hide Post
Kathi,
No hard feelings, I understand perfectly your point about using the force with organized gangs, I just think that your Topic title was too much "global" and that is not the best solution, some poachers once "converted" have been of great help to park officers.

Also I think that some of the best guides on the safari companies have been in some moment poachers.

"And what was that comment "if you are a real hunter"?"

That if you "feel" the hunt you must agree with me that some of the best hunters are poachers and their knowledge of the bush and the animals is incredible, talking with them and hunting together is a pleasure.

Any one that have hunted enough will know it, at least in this part of the world. I don't know how it works in Africa but from what I saw there, it's similar to South America.

From where you think most hunting guides comes from? not the outfitters but the guides. Do you think that the gaucho walking with you after a red stag or a wild boar don't poach or have poached??
 
Posts: 3085 | Location: Uruguay - South America | Registered: 10 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
As Lorenzo well points out, most of the time our best guides are also poachers. This is most unfortunate, because game populations diminish to the point of no return. It seems that teaching the economical value of hunting to our peasants is a very difficult task. Of course, the landowners are the main culprits: the presente enormous benefits of sport hunting never reach these people, who look at the game animals like another form of beef.
Nevertheless, Ray�s speaks with the truth: an animal�s life never equals an human one.
 
Posts: 1020 | Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina | Registered: 21 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If the answer to this problem is reduction in poverty in Africa, then how to reduce poverty? A good first step would be a reduction in population.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Will
posted Hide Post
If you read the old (circa 1900) hunting books, the locals were always in a state of poverty, as defined today, where the practice was (and is?) to have one more kid (and wife?) then one could support.

If poaching is a result of poverty, self-induced or otherwise, you can kiss those elephants goodbye.
 
Posts: 19380 | Location: Ocala Flats | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One Of Us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

A good first step would be a reduction in population.






AIDS = Population control? Perhaps this might sound callous, but if one looks back through history, differant plagues have popped up when populations have gotten out of hand. Both with humans and in the animal kingdom...



The differance in africa nowadays is that the west consistantly "comes to the rescue" to save the sick and poor. Although I generally suspect the motive often has more to do with making ourselves feel better by thinking we have "helped" others, and showing other nations the we are the "best in the class". Unfortuantly this "help", both medicinal and otherwise, has caused the population in africa to rise out of control in the past few decades. The past reason for having 10 kids was to secure that enough would surive, to ultimatly take care of the elderly. Today, the same amount of kids are born but unlike in the past, most survive. Creating todays population problems. Maybe Chinas policy of enforcing one child per couple would be an idea... In reality though I see that this would be logistically impossible in Africa, so it looks to me like the old fashioned way of death by "plague" has found itself useful again.



The problem with AIDS as population control in africa seems to be that it is often the semi-educated middle class that gets it the most. They are the ones with enough money and status to "fool around" the most. As we saw many times in african countrys; a man of status was expected to have a few girls on the side... One would think that they would use condoms, but then as some nurses in Mozambique was overheard saying: "who wants to eat a banana with the peel on?!?!?". And these are suppossed to be educated health workers!



All in all, perhaps we in the west should stop sticking our noses into africas business and let it get on by itself for a while... Maybe the population would go down a bit, with survival of the smartest. Opps. I forgot all the western NGOs and govt. aid officials who have their personal economical and career interests in it continuing... So I guess that won't happen any time soon.



Over to poaching; I personally feel there is a differance between the local poacher who is out for his own familys dinner and takes out rather little, and the commercial poacher who is in the bushmeat market. I can understand the former, but I have no mercy for the latter. Not to mention ivory poachers and the like, who should be shot no matter what level of the poaching ladder they are on. IMO.



Erik D.
 
Posts: 2662 | Location: Oslo, in the naive land of socialist nepotism and corruption... | Registered: 10 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of b.martins
posted Hide Post
Quote:

A good first step would be a reduction in population.





A reduction in population?

Have you taken a close look at population numbers on African countries lately?
Lets compare some figures:- Take New York city for instance: The �Big Apple� by itself has far more inhabitants than Angola, and as many as Mozambique!
And what about Tokyo?

It may piss you off to find out that an African poacher is killing the same game you are seeking, but please stop and try to analyse the motivations of each one of you before you take a shot at him!
And wile doing that, go deeper into the problem and see if you can find out where and how that poacher was given the means to perform his poaching!

Could the solution for the problem be the combined result of: development of African countries agriculture and industries (instead of being just a cheap source of raw materials) and reduction on demand, from western and Asian countries, for ivory, hides, furs, horns, etc� (Reducing NY and Tokyo�s population might help solving part of the problem )

B.Martins
 
Posts: 538 | Location: Lisboa,Portugal | Registered: 16 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 3485 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 22 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Well, as you can see, I agree 100% with Ganyana and I do not have any answers as to how to deal with the problem and it would not matter if I did, no one would listen, the world is getting too small I suspect...

If you think AIDS is going to be the magic bullet, think again, it will not make a dent... Many are thinking that is their last hope, but a cure will be found, and the die off will be less than some are hoping I fear...

Our hope lies in the building of schools, the education of the African black people, the ability to live if not in harmony then in some kind of mutual agreement for each other.

I have seen that the black man and the white man can and do work together, Tanzania is a pretty good example, and it has not always been that way..

However I do have a solution, but remember I said no one would listen, and this is it...
Turn over the managment of the black populations of Africa to the Idaho Game and Fish Dept. and in two years they would all be on the endangered species list! OR option 2 would be to tell the Cajuns that Zulu and Yhosi are good to eat..

I'm outta here, just thought a little humor would brighten up this diatribe of something none of us have any control over as far as I can see....
 
Posts: 42226 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ray, I am not trying to give you a hard time on this, but personally I have no moral objection to a country having a shoot on sight rule for poachers. Isn't that why the game scout carries an AK47 anyway?
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Balla Balla
posted Hide Post
Please dont shoot the messenger ...



I tend to agree with Ganyana .... the money men are the problem, just like with drugs, dont we all wish we could get the BIG FISH but unfortunately when money and corruption are involved it is a perpetual cycle and the small fishes get eliminated, the BIG FISHES swim along with the current to greener pastures ...



There have been some heartfelt solutions offered to the problem in this thread, I dont want to sound like the typical HEADMASTER but a reality check for all of us might be in order ..



1) You wont keep the population under control, especially in Africa



2) You wont eliminate poverty, not in my, or my childrens life time, if ever



The only way to make inroads into Africas [ MAJOR PROBLEMS ] are to intall ( by force if necessary ) more reasonable governments whom care a little more about their people ... BUT the free world world has not the will or the compulsion to intefere, they prefer to leave the [ one party dictators ] in power and pour your hard earned taxes down a never ending black hole called AID and they bull..it you and I all the way to the bank that they are fixing the problems, dont believe a wink of it, all it achieves is to keep the tyrants in power and inflate their bank accounts with our money ..



Poaching is in reality wildlife terrorism, and you and I both know that with kid gloves solutions we wont defeat poaching OR terrorism, believe me we are only toying with the problem and using a rule book to fight it ... We wont succeed with a book of rules, maybe even without a rule book it will be tough, unfortunately that is a fact of life in our free democratic society, we try to be the goody 2 shoes ..



What a dilemna we all face, liberal and conservatives, whom is right !!! The liberals say talk talk talk and make concessions, the conservatives say hit first and talk later, always talk from a postion of strength ...



Have a wonderful day in paradise and think of those whom dont have a say in the big scheme of things, is there more that can be done, YES, but we will never all agree on the right path unfortunately ....



Peter
 
Posts: 3331 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
as anybody on here poached a deer or shoot over the limit on a bird hunt, just curious.
 
Posts: 1868 | Location: League City, Texas | Registered: 11 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Actually, no.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of hhmag
posted Hide Post
I think some of us are missing the point. In the 90's, I worked in training poacher control units in another central African country bordering the Sudan. Our problems were not the meat poacher trying to feed their family, but the gangs coming in from Sudan and Somalia. These guys shot everything on sight, including tourists. Simply put, I taught these units to shoot them from very long distances. These were not gangs of two or three guys, but 30 or 40 with automatic weapons and rpg's. I got no truck with putting a bullet in these guys. They are raping the land and destoying everything we as legal hunters have worked to achieve over the last century with game management and licensing programs. Life is cheap. If you don't believe that, see how much your life is worth when you try to arrest 40 guys with AK's intent on taking 20 elephant a day. I've been there, done that, got the t-shirt with a few ragged holes thru it for my effort. As was said, if you have not been in that situation, then your comments are merely talk and speculation. For those of us who have recieved lead for our efforts to stop wanton poaching, it is an entirely different matter. Ganyana is absolutely correct and the only person here who has spoken the exact words that are relevant here. I would much rather put a bullet in the middlemen's heads than the poachers, but you must start somewhere.
 
Posts: 395 | Location: Florida's Fabulous East Coast | Registered: 26 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NitroX
posted Hide Post
Quote:

as anybody on here poached a deer or shoot over the limit on a bird hunt, just curious.




If you shot poachers on sight down here, close to 95% of deer hunters would be gone, the old timers anyway.
 
Posts: 10138 | Location: Wine Country, Barossa Valley, Australia | Registered: 06 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  African Big Game Hunting    THE ONLY GOOD POACHER IS A DEAD POACHER

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: