Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Moderator |
Andy, I don't think you can ignore bullet weight as combined with the cross section area and to some degree the velcity, this is what governs peneration. A heavy for calibre bullet at a moderate velocity will perform far more reliably than a light for calibre bullet at a high velocity. A case in point is the old 6.5x54MS which performed far beyond its paper balistics simply because it used a heavy for calibre bullet of decent construction. Some of the old big bores had a very poor reputation because the bullets were too light and failed to penerate. In a small or medium bore this could be compensated for to some degree by increasing the velocity (bullet construction withstanding) but in a big bore this approach is not feasable, as it would increase the recoil far to much for most shooters. I think people are trying to make a set of universal rules for this subject but there are just too many variables. For me, as I tend to avoid the extreames in balistics, a .416, .404, or .470NE would be my choice as a stopper providing of course I could shoot it well. Pete | |||
|
Moderator |
I don't mean to speak for Andy, but if he is saying what I think he is, then I agree. Once you have sufficient bullet weight in a given caliber to provide penetration, you decrease the killing power if you decrease velocity by increasing the weight. That is why a 30 caliber w/ 250's won't kill as well as a 35 w/ 250's, only so much killing a 30 can do, and if you want more, increase both diameter and weight. I recall reading an article by a bear guide in Alaska where he stated that he fealt the 375 H&H killed better with 270's then 300's, and he fealt that in the 40 caliber, 300's were best, and in the 458, 350's. | |||
|
Moderator |
Interpreting the often dramatic results of rapid expansion or quick bullet upset on such soft skinned animals as lion and big bears as the "way to go" on elephant or cape buffalo is a mistake. Adequate bullet weight, providing time proven sectional density numbers, is not to be regarded as playing a secondary role to either velocity or cross sectional area when dealing with these animals. [This message has been edited by Nickudu (edited 07-22-2001).] | |||
|
One of Us |
One thing additional bullet weight does do (assuming appropriate expansion) is to maintain higher velocity along the penetration route. When I first got involved in guns and ballistics, I had two love affairs running at the same time....375 H&H and...High velocity. What had me beat at first was how a 300 Hornady 375 round nose gave such good results on a kangaroos or pigs as compared to the 270 with 100 and 130 grain bullets. Then it finally clicked. Firstly, that very blunt bullet needed very little expansion to get bigger in diameter (as compared to a spitzer)and while I only had 2500 at the muzzle as compared to 3100 to 3500, I think that 375 was travelling at much higher velocity "through the animal" even though impact velocity was much lower. Whether any of this transferrable to larger animals, I don't have a clue Mike | |||
|
Moderator |
Andy & Paul, I can see where you guys are coming from now.Providing I could shoot the next calibre up, I too would prefer to move up a calibre rather than try to stretch an existing "marginal" one by increasing bullet weight or velocity. In the real world though I guess many hunters can't go running out to buy a new rifle for a one off hunt. For them using heavier bullets, increasing velocity or switching to premiums is a way of squeezing the last little bit of performance from a round... a .270 or 30-06 on Elk (or should I say Eland on this forum!) springs to mind. As to the premium bullets, I certainly agree that they are the way to go for big game but they are yet another "variable" ( a very important one) when considering overall performance. Pete | |||
|
one of us |
Here we still are trying to squeeze more performance out of a marginal to sub-marginal cartridge from which the .375 does not suffer, for plainsgame. Go figure. | |||
|
<JohnDL> |
Question: Which do you think is the better "stopper"; a 416 Wby with 450 grain Woodleighs at about 2500 fps or a 458 Win, choose your load? | ||
one of us |
Andy and all, I think were all on the same track, just getting there a different route..I find it hard to disagree with all the posts... How about I take the 450 gr. 416 at 2350 and let it go at that.... ------------------ | |||
|
<Andy> |
Pete, The SD of a bullet in the box does not mean anything. The SD of the expanded bullet in the animal does. I was not suggesting shooting a 250 gr 375 at elephant. they do work dandy on both american bison and african buffalo. Anyone who wants an excell spread sheet on the premium 458 caliber bullets expansion, penetration, and weight retention can ask for one and I will e mail it to them. John and Saeed, maybe there is a way to post it here? the short course is that a 450 Barnes X (the best Barnes) had the same expansion as a 416 400 gr Swift. Andy | ||
Moderator |
Now that we've gone totally off course, thats what the second page in a post is for I'd like to address the premiums, and what I believe folks fail to grasp when applying them. What folks fail to grasp with a premium, is you increase killing power not by gaining penetration, but you do it by dropping bullet to increase the impact velocity, while retaining the same penetration, or obtaining slightly more. For instance, I'm fully confident that my 35 whelen ackley pushing a 250 gr a-frame 2700 fps will provide better terminal performance then a 375 H&H with conventional 270's. I suppose I could drop down to 225's, but I don't have the confidence I'd get consistant exits on angling shots with moose, thats probably asking a bit much even with the 250, but I won't be lacking in performance with this ~40 year old wildcat. I am really curious what a 570 gr X from the 500 Jeffrey will do at 2400 fps, though I can't afford to test it on anything that will really tax it. It should be outstanding on moose! | |||
|
one of us |
This is off course but the .416 with 400's at 2450 fps is certainly a "stopper" for me personally. That combination is just about my recoil tolerance limit. Especially off the bench. I am fine with .375's with 300's at 2500+ but beyond that; stick a fork in me as I am done. FN | |||
|
Moderator |
When setting up my .458 Lott, I could see that the very long 500 Grain Barnes "X" bullet took up most of the additional .300" of powder capacity offered by this case. As such, I selected the 450 Grain Barnes X", as it left some room for additional powder while still providing good "SD" numbers. Is this an example of the rationale Andy and Paul are projecting?? If so, I concur through my own actions but I think it could have been stated more clearly to begin with. | |||
|
<Don G> |
JR, The answer to your original question is "Yes", but it depends on who's doing the shooting! I go away for a couple of days, and you guys fall back into the same old rut! Buy their books and send 'em to school.... Daktari, I thought you'd have more important things on your mind by now! Don | ||
<Andy> |
Nickudu, Stated clearly; Drop down one or two bullet weights with a premium. the extra velocity messes them up. with a super premium, drop down one or two calibers. this really messes them up! Andy | ||
Moderator |
Andy, OK - Gotcha - Now I'm not so "messed up" as to the intended message. Thank you. | |||
|
<Andy> |
Nickudu and Paul, Im getting about 2475 fps with the 450 gr Swift, Barnes and Kodiak. this is in a 21 1/2 inch barrel from the 458 x 404 improved. Ive been using RL-15, 4064, and VV 540. Ill probably try Varget and WW 748 next, then a slower powder like 4350. I like this bullet weight. The Kodiak expanded to a perfectly uniform one inch. Andy | ||
Moderator |
Andy, That's real good vel from the short tube. The .458 Lott I referred to earlier has the standard 25.5" barrel and I was getting anywhere from 2,380 to 2,500 fps, depending on conditions, with an overall average of 2,450 with both the 450 "X" and Super Solids. I have the 450 "X" bullet from one buffalo here on my desk. After hitting just forward of the hip, it was found against the breastbone, expanded to .900", with all four petals rolled all the way back against the shank. It still weighed 448.8 grains. As you infer, velocity gained via the selection of a super premium a step down in weight, may offer insight into the discussion of "stopping power". I believe this line of thought may have merit so long as the velocity is not too high and / or the bullet too short. | |||
|
One of Us |
Man, talk about making a mountain out of a molehill here. the 416 is a superb caliber and it will handily stop anything given the opportunity of adequate shot placement. Although it qualifies as a "fight stopper" it is far more versatile in htat 200 plus yard shots are easily accomplished with this rifle. Like Saeed says, a stopper is a "right here, right now!" issue, up close and personal. And when viewed in that vein, the 45 plus calibers are my definition of stoppers. I must take exception to the left handed comments regarding Mr. Sullivan. If you don't know the man, shut the heck up. He is a true gentleman, certainly the kind of guy i want on my side in a "fight stopper" situation. enough said. jorge | |||
|
Moderator |
Jorge - If you utilize the "Search" feature and type in "Mark Sullivan" and then select "African Big Game Hunting" - all the earlier threads on this subject will come up for your perusal. Enjoy. [This message has been edited by Nickudu (edited 07-25-2001).] | |||
|
one of us |
Jeeez Nick you just ruined his day!! A Sullivan fan can go tits up reading some of that stuff!! | |||
|
One of Us |
I'd want Sullivan by my side alright. Right after I gut shot my buff three times. Only I might unload his gun first.... Now that's a video! Yep, I like ole Mark just fine....a true doormat. | |||
|
One of Us |
Brave men, those who slam others in the ether of the Internet. I don't know most of you ( nor do I want to actually ) So I'll refrain from character assasinations. Yes, i've been privy to the Sullivan haters club on here and other forums. For the record, I disagree with some of his philosophies and tactics in the bush--with one distinction-- I've told him in person. jorge | |||
|
Moderator |
Jorge, I suggest, then, you adhere to your own stated philosophy and refrain from instructing others to "shut the hell up", upon expressing their viewpoints, unless afforded the opportunity to do so personally. | |||
|
Administrator |
Jorge, ".....Yes, i've been privy to the Sullivan haters club on here and other forums" I think I speak for the majority of my friends on this forum in saying that non of us hate Mark Sullivan! What we do take exception to is his silly showmanship, where he lets a noble animal suffer unnecessarily, just to inflate his own ego. I can guarantee you that I will have no hesitation in telling this to his face. I will also be happy to inform him that I will hang my rifle and give up hunting before hunting with a so called PH like him. To me, a true PH will guide his client to his trophy, and let him shoot it without all this Hollywood grandstanding. A true PH will not fire more shots at the animal than his clients either. ------------------ www.accuratereloading.com | |||
|
One of Us |
Saeed - Perfect description and right on target. Enough said about Sullivan. (I hope) | |||
|
One of Us |
Saeed: Your opinions are well stated and accepted. i don't have a probelm with people not liking Sullivan. Those films of his attained his intended goal; make lots of money! and they did. All the clients shown in his videos were fully briefed before hand. Ku-de, I din't say "hell," and i don't obejct to gentlemen like Saeed's well-reasoned disapproval of his tactics. Somehow he got the message across without using such sophomoric phrases like "doormat," etc. Breeding shows I guess. | |||
|
Moderator |
quote: EXCACTLY! Regards, | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia