Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
As per Rowland Ward�s records, 276 or so bull elephants with tusks weighing more than 100 lbs. is the all time harvest. Of these 59 weighed more than 145 lbs. The world�s record seems to be the Kilimanjaro Bull, shot circa 1897, whose tusks weighed 237.5 and 226.5 lbs. Some old accounts, as far as the XVIII Century quote even heavier weights. Several Spanish hunters related that at Rejaf, Sudan, they saw a magnificent pair weighing 95 kilograms each one, and W.Robert Foran shows a photo of an impressive bull shot by a Mr. Bishop, weighing some 190 lbs. or near it. The King of Murripa, shot by Harry Manners in 1937 weighed 185 and 183 lbs. My question is: which is the best bull of modern times?. Wally Johnson said that he saw two 200 pounders during his long hunting career... You, the African pundits, may have the answer.. | ||
|
One of Us |
Here's a very informative and interesting site with information on the largest elephants ever taken. Safari Press World Records Elephants [ 08-29-2003, 21:13: Message edited by: mrlexma ] | |||
|
one of us |
Hmmm... Bring up the pictures of the #4 and the #7 records on your screen side-by-side.... If Gates' tusks are within 10 pounds of Manners' tusks, I'll eat my hat. Either the wrong picture is associated with the numbers, or somebody needs to demand a "recount" on a set of calibrated scales. Ruark has a photo of him standing with a set of 110-pound tusks, and they are almost identical in size to the Gates tusks. Rick. | |||
|
<SkiBumplus3> |
Rick, I also noticed a difference. What could the explanation be? Ski+3 | ||
Moderator |
Large nerve cavities will result in 'light-for-length' tusks, and vice-versa. How tall were Manners and his helpers? How tall was Elgin Gates? George | |||
|
one of us |
Rick, How would you like that hat prepared? Cross | |||
|
one of us |
Gates was well known for hyping his trophies, for instance, the obviously fake photo of a "doctored" kudu he used on the cover of one of his books. I would bet that Rick3foxes hat is entirely safe. | |||
|
one of us |
So whats up with #5 & #6? did they get lost? | |||
|
one of us |
Harry Manners was a 5'6" giant of a man. Elgin Gates was 6'6" or was that 6'8"? Even so, Elgin is blowing smoke up someone's ass if his tusks are over 110 lbs. each. Somebody had his thumb (or foot) on the scales on that weigh-in with Elgin. | |||
|
<J Brown> |
Here is what I posted a few months back in regards to Gates 180 pounder: quote:and quote:and quote: [ 08-30-2003, 18:52: Message edited by: J Brown ] | ||
One of Us |
The outward appearance of tusks can be deceiving. The real "maker" when it comes to tusks lies in the size of the nerve inside the tusk. If the nerve is a long one, it detracts from the weight of the tusk so Gates' tusks might not seem to weigh the stated poundage. Maybe Craig can post to the validity of your statement, but from what I have been able to read and speak with people that new him, his trophies were legit. I'm also happy that he used a 300 Weatherby jorge | |||
|
Moderator |
In a given elephant tusk, nerve cavity variation is 10lbs., at most. Because tusks are kidney shaped, trying to estimate their weight from a single perspective is difficult, at best. I have no doubt as to the validity of the weight of Mr. Gates tusks. [ 09-01-2003, 07:45: Message edited by: Nickudu ] | |||
|
one of us |
Thanks to you all for the very interesting data. I must add that the weights of the number 1 were taken when "fresh". Thus the present 226.5 and 214.5 are correct and refer to the same animal. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia