Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I think Winchester chambered the 300 H&H in their Model 70. A pre-64 M70 in this calibre would be a pleasure to own and use. RJW | |||
|
one of us |
Aaron What type of 9.3x62 do you trade, like make. Cheers | |||
|
<Aaron Rust> |
Flip, Husqvarna! With M96 action. Aaron | ||
Moderator |
Aaron, Any difference in performance that may exist between the various .300 Magnums would be secondary to your favoring one of them. I find them all appealing for various reasons and feel as you do about the old H&H. I might add that the inherent ease of function of this case design is not to be dismissed. After all these years, it remains a fine choice. | |||
|
one of us |
"Was Holland's round ever produced by a American gun co.?" Winchester introduced it in the Model 70, at the same time as the .375 H&H. If memory serves, I think that was around 1937. (I think that Remington may also have chambered the round for its rifles but I'm not sure about that.) Ironically, American ammunition manufacturers started producing .300 H&H and .375 H&H ammo around 1925. The .300 H&H was THE .30 caliber magnum for many years. Winchester's introduction of the .300 Win Mag started the slow "fall from grace" of the .300 H&H in new factory rifle production. I did find a used Winchester Model 70 XTR (post-64, push feed) in .300 H&H. I bought it as soon as I saw it! Sure, I wish it was a pre-64 but it's a nice rifle and shoots well. I do not know the history of my rifle as far as what year it was made, etc. I do suspect that it was a special production run since it's a XTR model (later post-64 production) in .300 H&H. I think Winchester pretty much quit chambering the .300 H&H round when they brought out the .300 Win Mag and the new Model 70 (post-64, push feed). I find the .300 H&H easy to load for and I like the long case neck as opposed to the very short neck on the .300 Win Mag case. The .300 H&H will still do a very fine job. Plus, I too just like the nostalgia factor. -Bob F. | |||
|
one of us |
Aaron, I settled on the 300 H&H many years ago, then abandoned it for the 300 Win. then the Wby version, and in a short time went back to the old 300 H&H and have never regretted that move... I like the feeding of that sloping torpedo tube. I like the long neck and the fact that 220 gr. bullets don't interfere with the powder charge and I like the nostalgia of the old girl. For any practical field purpose it can be handloaded to the same balistics of the rest of the 300's, and does this without the recoil caused by a sharp shoulder so perhaps it's slighty milder in felt recoil to most. Most Africans prefer the H&H and I believe that is because they tend to like the 220 gr. and heavier bullets (the long neck enhances their use) and they like the big bullets for bushveld hunting, with the option of the 200's for the highveld. Africans tend to like heavier bullets than Americans and they are not so carried away with velocity as Americans, an opinnion I agree with, I like heavy for caliber bullets... ------------------ | |||
|
<Don Martin29> |
I came upon a pre-64 M-70 in 300 H&H and I really like it. It's the nostalgia factor plus it's a fine rifle. I am keeping a eye on the cases as I detected some web thinning with my wire feeler inside the case near the base. I think it may have been caused by the fact that the cases had primer pockets that were too shallow. I reamed the pockets deeper and time will tell. Ray, What did you mean by a "X" die in another thread? I never thought of the case shoulder having an effect on recoil. I suppose that's why the .458 Winchester is such a pussy cat. | ||
one of us |
Aaron, Both Winchester and Remington included the Holland Super 30 in their ammunition and rifle lines. I remember when my uncle Larry got his .300 H&H Mag Winchester M70. He was teased because the little blacktail deer we hunted were way more suited to a .300 Savage -- which the riest of the family shot. I remember Remington chambering it in the M721, their long-action predecessor to the M700. I don't recall if it was included in the M725. jim dodd ------------------ | |||
|
one of us |
/ | |||
|
<CABirdDog> |
Remington chambered the 700 Classic for it back in 83' still a few around. Check this site once in a while and see what comes up. | ||
one of us |
I found a pre64 in a gun shop in Ocala last year and snapped it up. It was not pristine, having had a side mount scope put on it (which came as part of the deal), a Redfield receiver sight, and a recoil pad put on it. Still it is just right for me; a shooter not a wall hanger. Of all the rifles I have used, it is by far the slickest feeding one I have ever seen. The way it chambers a round is sensual. I am in the process of getting it "cleaned" up, and accurized. As is, it will shoot about 2"@100yds. I know that it can do better. Ray, I find that the magazine box of the M70 does not facilitate bullets seated out to just off the rifling. A spire point seated to that depth will not fit in the magazine. I guess they were chambered and throated for the 220 and 180 round nose. Powder capacity is not a issue because the case is so large. I will have to find some round nose bullets and see what the seating depth is for them. there is not a problem with not enough powder. Ku-dude | |||
|
one of us |
My pristine Pre-64 M70 in 300H&H just loves the 220 grain Nosler Partition. Shoots 1/2" groups at 100 yards at just over 2,700 fps. It really is in 99% condition and I have been hesitant to hunt with it due to its condition. However, it is not much fun just having it sit in the safe, I may break down and take it the next time I get to Africa. I can't think of a better combo than my Pre-64 M70 in 375H&H and my Pre-64 M70 in 300H&H. A classic pair. Tim | |||
|
one of us |
I bought a Remington 721 in 300H&H a couple years ago. Its about mint, and I paid maybe $400 for it. I put a dakota express sight on it, a Unertl Hawk 4X and quick detach mounts. The whole set up works great, and the feeding is a smooth as anything. My best load is 69.5 grains of H4831 with a nosler ballistic tip. Don't know the velocity, but my brother and dad used it this year and took 2 bucks with it. It's a great value in a classic cartridge. | |||
|
one of us |
Don M, An X die is the newbie from RCBS..you never have to trim a case except prior to the first loading. The X die returns the case to specs without trimming...I don't know yet how many times it will work but I laoded some 8x57 9 times without stretch. The case wore out... The only draw back to the 300 H&H, like the 404, 375 and a few others is they stretch a little more than the 300 Win. for instance, no big deal to me..but the X dies end that problem..I think they would have to be Special order for the 300 H&H and 404... ------------------ | |||
|
one of us |
quote: Interesting site: I found some nice H&H .300 - I like those older Winch. #70. And I also searched for and found my old Husky #146 9.3x57 for $575. I bought mine for a hundred here - and that was a bit expensive. One should buy a bunch of them and bring to the US for selling! Best regards, Fritz ------------------ | |||
|
one of us |
RJW, Yes, they did. Yes, I do. Yes, it is. Sarge | |||
|
<lb404> |
Aaron, As i am a collector and seller of pre-64 model 70 rifels I often get 300 H&H rifles. I have sevral for you to choose from. My wife and daughter both used a custom barrelled 300 H&H to take game in Namibia last year. The recoil profile was such that they were very comfortable shooting 5 heads of game with it all one shot kills. Look forward to seeing you in the fall. Leonard and Susan | ||
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia