PLease review the information below & vote in favor of the motion

01 April 2016, 16:26

Bwana Bunduki

quote:
Originally posted by larryshores:
The opposition is getting hammered good and proper. Regardless, I doubt many minds will be changed.

If I am successful in getting certain organizations to E mail this, the site will bombarded by pro hunting responses .

They have closed the gap overnight.

Lets keep this rolling!!!!!

Jeff

01 April 2016, 17:45

Acer

Only wish you could talk sense to folks like Cyndi who have posted comments there. I can only hope she will take the time to listen to any eventual debate that comes from this.

quote:
Tuesday, 29 March 2016 12:22 posted by Cyndi
Hunters are murderers !
Of our planet's fauna and flora are endangered.
Hunters kills just for trophies, for the hungry there are shops !

01 April 2016, 18:27

larryshores

I saw that one.

I would like to turn her loose in some of the places I have been and give her a $1,000 food allowance. See how that works out for her. F'ing idiot.

01 April 2016, 19:09

Bwanamich

My comment left last afternoon still hasn't shown. In fact the last comment appearing is dated April 30th! Or am missing something?

01 April 2016, 19:57

Thierry Labat

Done. Now 64% for and 36 against.

01 April 2016, 20:38

Bwana Bunduki

65% now

Keep up the pressure

02 April 2016, 02:20

larryshores

Please sent this to as many people as you can think of .

02 April 2016, 02:34

Frostbit

quote:
Originally posted by larryshores:
Please sent this to as many people bad you can think of .

Auto-correct strikes again.

I have emailed the link to everyone in my email contacted that I know is not an anti.

______________________
DRSS
______________________
Hunt Reports

2015 His & Her Leopards with Derek Littleton of Luwire Safaris - http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/2971090112
2015 Trophy Bull Elephant with CMS http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/1651069012
DIY Brooks Range Sheep Hunt 2013 - http://forums.accuratereloadin...901038191#9901038191
Zambia June/July 2012 with Andrew Baldry - Royal Kafue http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/7971064771
Zambia Sept 2010- Muchinga Safaris http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/4211096141
Namibia Sept 2010 - ARUB Safaris http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/6781076141

02 April 2016, 03:02

larryshores

Yup. I shouldn't be posting while turkey hunting .

02 April 2016, 08:37

Buzz Charlton

Done!- Great response well done!

02 April 2016, 08:44

Ackley Improved User

Done.

02 April 2016, 15:13

Paul Reed

Done and Forwarded

02 April 2016, 17:08

Vaquero

done

03 April 2016, 05:00

bcap

they are catching up everyone needs to vote again

03 April 2016, 05:18

Gusteaux

The site doesn't log "cookies", IP or MAC Addresses - what that means is one person can "vote" as many times as they want or have time for without ANY limits.

Was watching it for a bit today and it started out earlier today at 68% for and 32% against. Support has dropped to 56%. Watching the voting results, it's pretty obvious there are individuals "camping" on the site and logging in 100's of "votes" at a time against hunting.

Time to start fighting fire with fire.

03 April 2016, 07:18

Bwana Bunduki

Vote

Refresh the screen

Vote again.

Fuck fair...

Jeff

03 April 2016, 07:38

larryshores

Glad y'all noticed that .

03 April 2016, 07:44

MikeBurke

I cannot find any new comments since 03-30. I posted one but it has not been published.

In Louisiana we have a saying "Vote early, vote often"

03 April 2016, 07:55

larryshores

It is pretty clear the other side is manipulating the vote.

03 April 2016, 08:49

Bwana Bunduki

PM me and I will tell how to really pile on votes. I was watching 5-10 votes per 15 seconds post.

Figured it out.

03 April 2016, 11:29

Scriptus

Done !

03 April 2016, 20:53

Safaris Botswana Bound

Done

03 April 2016, 21:26

larryshores

Please note that one can vote an unlimited number of times.

03 April 2016, 22:28

MARK H. YOUNG

Just looked at the page again today. It's so disheartening to read the many well thought out comments by hunters and then see that it has no effect on these folks. To paraphrase "Hunters are killers and not conservationists". It's like a mantra for their righteousness and reason be damned.

Mark

04 April 2016, 16:48

Bwana Bunduki

Good Work this weekend lads!!!!

Keep Voting!!!

The enemy is

Jeff

05 April 2016, 00:15

larryshores

Please keep spreading the word. The antis are losing badly.

Some new comments are posted. Many are downright shocking.

05 April 2016, 03:51

crbutler

Geez guys, if it isn't a fair poll, doesn't mean you have to cheat. I am sure they can check for multiple votes from the same ISP if they want to.

Play by the rules, Br keep on top of it and state that it's being manipulated.

We have a heck of a lot more reasoned comments than they do. That makes them look bad, no?

05 April 2016, 04:40

Gusteaux

CR - rationally I would normally agree with you but in this case, this website has PURPOSELY left this open for some undisclosed reason.

IF they had intended to have a truly fair and honest poll, they would have built in either IP address logging/lock out (can still be by-passed/spoofed) or MAC Address logging/locking much more difficult to spoof/by-pass. Kind of like Democrats being against voter ID laws.

The overall problem is the "antis" don't play by the rules just like terrorists/ISIS don't play by the "rules". Besides, under Obama's "rules" if you remember his quote not long ago, "if they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun".

Admittedly, this is trying to "justify" multiple votes, but it can also just as easily be viewed as using the tools the site owners/developers/admin have more than likely purposely left "open" because all their voting/poll are set up the same. Nobody, our side or the other side, is "breaking through firewalls, stealing passwords etc.

Don't get me wrong, in a "normal" and "moral" world I would agree with you 100%. On the other hand, all you have to do is read the posts of the antis and realize we are not dealing with "normal", "rational" nor "thinking" individuals.

Lastly, never forget that IF they were, or become ahead/win by whatever method they assuredly WILL use it to "prove" their "superiority" and massive public support.

05 April 2016, 21:26

JTEX

76% for and 24% against today!

We need to keep this kind of stuff up.

.

05 April 2016, 21:31

larryshores

Take some time and read some of the responses. Many are WAY out there.

05 April 2016, 22:19

fairgame

quote:
Originally posted by larryshores:
Take some time and read some of the responses. Many are WAY out there.

Agree and it is plain and simple anti hunting. They offer no land use plan or alternative for marginal lands.

Nor will they accept responsibility for the collapse of wild Africa.

05 April 2016, 23:14

Bwana Bunduki

quote:
Originally posted by m3taco:
CR - rationally I would normally agree with you but in this case, this website has PURPOSELY left this open for some undisclosed reason.

IF they had intended to have a truly fair and honest poll, they would have built in either IP address logging/lock out (can still be by-passed/spoofed) or MAC Address logging/locking much more difficult to spoof/by-pass. Kind of like Democrats being against voter ID laws.

The overall problem is the "antis" don't play by the rules just like terrorists/ISIS don't play by the "rules". Besides, under Obama's "rules" if you remember his quote not long ago, "if they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun".

Admittedly, this is trying to "justify" multiple votes, but it can also just as easily be viewed as using the tools the site owners/developers/admin have more than likely purposely left "open" because all their voting/poll are set up the same. Nobody, our side or the other side, is "breaking through firewalls, stealing passwords etc.

Don't get me wrong, in a "normal" and "moral" world I would agree with you 100%. On the other hand, all you have to do is read the posts of the antis and realize we are not dealing with "normal", "rational" nor "thinking" individuals.

Lastly, never forget that IF they were, or become ahead/win by whatever method they assuredly WILL use it to "prove" their "superiority" and massive public support.

We are at war.

Take that however you like.

Jeff

05 April 2016, 23:51

COYOTE HUNTER

When I read some of the responses I come to the conclusion that we will likely never "win" this battle of public opinion.
When people are attached to emotional decisions no amount of reason or facts will overcome the "I know I'm right" feeling. When they read anything at all that supports their emotion, then that has to be true and they don't bother to fact check it.

08 April 2016, 04:42

bcap

I hope we learn something from this. If you see as of the last few days they seem to have gave up on the votes and just a few keep trying to say stupid stuff.

This should just show looking the other way or being scared to fight fire with fire back on any social media stuff is not the way we should handle the anti's. Fight backing sure seemed to shut them down after just a few days