THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM HUNTING FORUMS

Merry Christmas to our Accurate Reloading Members

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
SCI: Missing in Action?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted
For members, if you have not already received your latest issue of Safari, flip through it when you get it. Here is what you will find on the Cecil incident . . . one sentence on page 12 out of a magazine that is almost 200 pages long. Nothing about (i) how hunters can help address the issue, (ii) why it is important for all hunters to stand together, (iii) facts supporting the role that hunters play in conservation, (iv) what SCI is doing to try and get its arms around the social media issue, etc. Nothing. So in the face of the biggest media black eye hunting has sustained, not one article on the issue and what is or can be done to help fight back? Disappointed does not even begin to capture how I feel.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
Is Cecil illegible for one of the INNER CIRCLES?
If he was, SCI would have had half the magazine devote to him!

SCI has lost the plot a looooong time ago!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69702 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I think SCI dropped the ball and turned their back on hunters when they immediately suspended the hunter before he was charged or convicted.
 
Posts: 100 | Location: The island in the east | Registered: 13 June 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
.............................................................Shameful, to say the least!
.................................................................. 2020


....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982

Hands of Old Elmer Keith

 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
First for hunters.... barf
 
Posts: 11636 | Location: Wisconsin  | Registered: 13 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mike - Did you or your chapter president go to the board meeting last week? Our president came back, briefed us, and told us it was extensively talked about during the week.
 
Posts: 111 | Registered: 19 March 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
Jeff, I do not know. I am scheduled to have a call with some SCI folks in the next week or so to learn a little about what they discussed in DC. One thing they will hear from me is, the Cecil incident occurred in July. It is now September. If that is the standard for a rapid response in the electronic age, we just better quit now and forget about it. Extensive talk will not cut it. And what is the harm in telling the members, here is what we are doing from a process perspective to address the issue of being unprepared (admit the ball was dropped, everyone knows it), even if they do not want to get into specifics. The problem at SCI is that there is no one person driving the bus, the bus is driven by committee. It means it takes too long to do things, actions are reduced to the lowest common denominator and conflicting policy priorities mean actions when taken are muted. It really is no way to run an organization.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mike, I am mildly curious - What do you believe that SCI could have done to either: 1. Eliminate or at least curtail some of the public backlash or 2. Stop the airlines from reacting to the public backlash?

I do not finding it at all surprising that SCI has had no effect on the incident. And that's not an indictment of SCI, just embracing a little fact and reality.


___________________

Just Remember, We ALL Told You So.
 
Posts: 22445 | Location: Occupying Little Minds Rent Free | Registered: 04 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mike, you make some good points. Hopefully the phone call will clear up some questions you have. Please report back and let us know how it goes.
 
Posts: 111 | Registered: 19 March 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Opus1:
Mike, I am mildly curious - What do you believe that SCI could have done to either: 1. Eliminate or at least curtail some of the public backlash or 2. Stop the airlines from reacting to the public backlash?

I do not finding it at all surprising that SCI has had no effect on the incident. And that's not an indictment of SCI, just embracing a little fact and reality.


1. Nothing
2. Nothing

This was an issue festering under the skin for years, waiting for the right opportunity to erupt. The foundation for the reaction was laid years ago. Nothing in the moment was likely to change the dynamic.

I think it is more an issue of what does the organization do going forward to educate hunters and public, unify hunters of all types, develop an effective social media platform and lobbying arm, etc. Had they done that five years ago, would it have made a difference, who knows. Embracing fact and reality in my view is to acknowledge that the organization cannot continue to approach things in the same way it has historically and expect any different result.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
tu2

Just a suggestion - you should encourage SCI to become more engaged on the ground in RSA, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Zambia, Mozambique, and Namibia. They should fund and encourage governments to obtain data and publish it for public consumption. Data like:

Total money spent on sport hunting by country.
Total hunting funds that are paid directly into communities.
Total animals taken through sport hunting.
Total animals killed by illegal poaching.
Total animals legally killed through cattle/human encounters.
Estimates on animal numbers by species.
Historic estimates on animal numbers by species.
Total land set aside for hunting/conservation.

Most of this data is no longer tracked in many of these countries because there are no funds available. Some of this data is tracked, however, the governments are reluctant to disclose it due to the potential anti-hunter boycott/backlash. If SCI wanted to do something useful for both these countries as well as the hunting community as a whole, they need to start collecting the data and presenting the facts.


___________________

Just Remember, We ALL Told You So.
 
Posts: 22445 | Location: Occupying Little Minds Rent Free | Registered: 04 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Use Enough Gun
posted Hide Post
Give them hell Mike! tu2
 
Posts: 18590 | Registered: 04 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yes, very disappointed in the missing in action status of SCI in the Cecil Issue. Lost the initiative in the debate with the antis to educate the world about the benefits of Trophy hunting in conservation.
 
Posts: 920 | Location: Chico California | Registered: 02 May 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Opus1:
tu2

Just a suggestion - you should encourage SCI to become more engaged on the ground in RSA, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Zambia, Mozambique, and Namibia. They should fund and encourage governments to obtain data and publish it for public consumption. Data like:

Total money spent on sport hunting by country.
Total hunting funds that are paid directly into communities.
Total animals taken through sport hunting.
Total animals killed by illegal poaching.
Total animals legally killed through cattle/human encounters.
Estimates on animal numbers by species.
Historic estimates on animal numbers by species.
Total land set aside for hunting/conservation.

Most of this data is no longer tracked in many of these countries because there are no funds available. Some of this data is tracked, however, the governments are reluctant to disclose it due to the potential anti-hunter boycott/backlash. If SCI wanted to do something useful for both these countries as well as the hunting community as a whole, they need to start collecting the data and presenting the facts.


Exactly, I strongly believe that the numbers would tell a pretty convincing tale. Why not develop a "fact sheet" or "finger tip facts" card that lays out the actual numbers in terms of dollars hunting pumps into conservation, local economic impact of hunting, species numbers in areas with hunting and without hunting, relative economic impact of hunting safaris versus photographic safaris, habitat preserved through hunting, etc. There could be non-hunting info too. For example, to me the greatest threat to Africa's wildlife is loss of habitat. To put that in perspective, the population of Africa quadrupled from 1955 to 2009; doubled from 1982 to 2009; and is expected to more than double from 1.1 billion in 2015 to over 2.4 billion in 2050. If you cannot find ways like hunting to make the preservation of wildlife pay, the habitat and consequently the wildlife will be lost to population growth. Sheesh, we have a great story to tell we just need someone to write the damn story up and start telling it.

killpc


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chin-gas-cook:
I think SCI dropped the ball and turned their back on hunters when they immediately suspended the hunter before he was charged or convicted.


Excuse me. Forget about Cecil. Palmer pled guilty to a wildlife law violation several years ago. Why should he have been allowed to remain an SCI member after that? I would prefer to think that any wildlife conservation association I am a member of does not include ex-felons convicted of violating wildlife protection laws. If SCI is to be faulted on Palmer, it is for not acting several years ago to throw him out . . . and why is he just suspended now . . . his conviction is public record, boot him out yesterday.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You're excused.
Yes, of course they should have done it previously. But, they didn't. So why, now suspend him? 2 wrongs.....
 
Posts: 100 | Location: The island in the east | Registered: 13 June 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal pappas
posted Hide Post
Whilst I'm not a fan of SCI, I would guess there was too little time to put the information in the latest issue of their rag. Most magazines run 2-3 months behind due to the time to edit and publish.
Cal


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
 
Posts: 7281 | Location: Willow, Alaska | Registered: 29 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of billrquimby
posted Hide Post
Mike and Cal both have it right.

SCI has always been overloaded with committees and slow to move, as Mike says.

It's been 17 years since I published Safari magazine, but as Cal says, we worked at least 60 days in advance of the publication dates.

To get timely information to members, we launched Safari Times and set our drop-dead deadline at one week before press time.

Bill Quimby
 
Posts: 2633 | Location: tucson and greer arizona | Registered: 02 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
I wonder if someone had made an exceptional, one of the kind convention auction donation late in the publication cycle if SCI would have found a way to work it into the magazine? Yes, at this point I am a cynic when it comes to the efforts of SCI to get its act together.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
Mike,
I have gone on record here many times telling this crowd that SCI is dumb as a box of rocks.

When the LCTF put together a coalition of scientists willing to say that Lion Hunting was OK as long as you targeted the right lions...what did they do??? Not a f***ing thing. They let a golden opportunity pass.

I personally am a life member of DSC and I let my membership to SCI lapse.

After dealing with the higher ups of SCI over the "Definition of a Huntable Male Lion"...I reiterate...the management of that org IS...dumb as a box of rocks.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38629 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
I am struggling with the membership renewal issue currently. Nationally, I do not think they will ever get to where they need to be because I do not think they are prepared to make the necessary organizational changes to be successful, like having the executive committee step back from involvement in day to day activities. On the other hand, the local SCI Chapter in Houston really does do some great work in the community.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
You can be a local Chapter member and not be a national member. I am a member of the North Texas chapter.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38629 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
I need to check on that.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Skyline
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
You can be a local Chapter member and not be a national member. I am a member of the North Texas chapter.


I could be wrong, but I don't think so Lane. When I use to belong to an SCI Chapter you also had to be a National or International Member.


______________________________________________

The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who are bereft of that gift.



 
Posts: 1868 | Location: Northern Rockies, BC | Registered: 21 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
Maybe y'all are correct and my Chapter just has not kicked me out. I was a national member when I joined the chapter club.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38629 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
We can make all the excuses we want for their lack of any proper action in this case.

But, we are really forgetting that in principle, SCI has been nothing but a trophy scoring organization for so many years, that nothing else matters to them any more.

How many years some of us have been asking WHAT has SCI actually DONE for hunters and conservation in AFRICA??

All we were getting nothing but lip service!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69702 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
SCI used to have an office in Joburg - it was run by Andre de George and was pretty active in getting the word across to government depts up as far as at least Tanzania. This was when I lived in Dar. I think though that a lot of this initiative was taken locally - not sure there was much support from Stateside.

Seems like the wheels have fallen off since then?

I gave my membership up after writing them a nasty letter for all the things they were not doing and for the drivel pumped out in Safari magazine.

Some weird people in there - and yes I met them all the way to the top.
 
Posts: 204 | Location: The frozen north of Scotland | Registered: 01 July 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kuwinda:

Seems like the wheels have fallen off since then?

I gave my membership up after writing them a nasty letter for all the things they were not doing and for the drivel pumped out in Safari magazine.
It was called the Global Financial Crisis.


A day spent in the bush is a day added to your life
Hunt Australia - Website
Hunt Australia - Facebook
Hunt Australia - TV


 
Posts: 4456 | Location: Australia | Registered: 23 January 2003Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Graham:
quote:
Originally posted by Kuwinda:

Seems like the wheels have fallen off since then?

I gave my membership up after writing them a nasty letter for all the things they were not doing and for the drivel pumped out in Safari magazine.
It was called the Global Financial Crisis.



We still wonder where the millions SCI gets from their blackmail go??

Remember, they make millions every year, what is being done with it towards actual conservation??


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69702 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Graham:
quote:
Originally posted by Kuwinda:

Seems like the wheels have fallen off since then?

I gave my membership up after writing them a nasty letter for all the things they were not doing and for the drivel pumped out in Safari magazine.
It was called the Global Financial Crisis.



We still wonder where the millions SCI gets from their blackmail go??

Remember, they make millions every year, what is being done with it towards actual conservation??
You enjoy trolling your own forum?


A day spent in the bush is a day added to your life
Hunt Australia - Website
Hunt Australia - Facebook
Hunt Australia - TV


 
Posts: 4456 | Location: Australia | Registered: 23 January 2003Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Graham:
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Graham:
quote:
Originally posted by Kuwinda:

Seems like the wheels have fallen off since then?

I gave my membership up after writing them a nasty letter for all the things they were not doing and for the drivel pumped out in Safari magazine.
It was called the Global Financial Crisis.



We still wonder where the millions SCI gets from their blackmail go??

Remember, they make millions every year, what is being done with it towards actual conservation??
You enjoy trolling your own forum?


Neither me nor many hunters enjoy the shenanigans SCI has betting getting up to.
All in our name!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69702 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Skyline
posted Hide Post
The cost of operation with SCI has got to be enormous. I do not think I have ever seen an organization that is worse for being top heavy. Ever look at the myriad of elected positions? Meetings in DC.

Then there is the magazine and monthly. Brutally expensive with publication/postage/shipping. Add in headquarters/Administration/museum in AZ, etc, etc.

I can easily see a huge amount of money seeping away. I personally believe that it is a classic example of inefficiency.


______________________________________________

The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who are bereft of that gift.



 
Posts: 1868 | Location: Northern Rockies, BC | Registered: 21 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skyline:
The cost of operation with SCI has got to be enormous. I do not think I have ever seen an organization that is worse for being top heavy. Ever look at the myriad of elected positions? Meetings in DC.

Then there is the magazine and monthly. Brutally expensive with publication/postage/shipping. Add in headquarters/Administration/museum in AZ, etc, etc.

I can easily see a huge amount of money seeping away. I personally believe that it is a classic example of inefficiency.


Along those lines, think of the amount of money lost in administrative cost when you take all of the competing hunting organizations into account, like SCI, DSC, HSC, RMEF, DU, QU, NWSF, NWTF, etc. They all have overhead and administrative costs. All of those administrative costs are therefore lost for purposes of lobbying, advocacy, education, missions and the like. It is hugely inefficient. If this was a business, someone would be doing roll-up mergers of all these entities and saving all that lost administrative cost.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Graham:
quote:
Originally posted by Kuwinda:

Seems like the wheels have fallen off since then?

I gave my membership up after writing them a nasty letter for all the things they were not doing and for the drivel pumped out in Safari magazine.
It was called the Global Financial Crisis.



We still wonder where the millions SCI gets from their blackmail go??

Remember, they make millions every year, what is being done with it towards actual conservation??


That's the proverbial million dollar question. And one that has been asked over and over again with no clear answer and no proof that much of anything has been accomplished. That's why so many of us stopped supporting them.

Maybe this time it will be different... maybe not...


___________________

Just Remember, We ALL Told You So.
 
Posts: 22445 | Location: Occupying Little Minds Rent Free | Registered: 04 October 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Just so we don't forget, SCI sends a small handful of children to some sort of mystery camp for photos opps every year.

sofa


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16700 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have pointed out, and will do again here, DSC has EIGHT FULL TIME EMPLOYEES ONLY. The overhead, when compared to SCI is a percentage of a fraction. A very stark contrast in overhead and waste.


Dave Fulson
 
Posts: 1467 | Registered: 20 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
Fair enough. Of course administrative costs are not just salaries, but would pick up office expense, publications, website maintenance, advertising, sponsorships, third party costs, and the like. Add that up over the plethora of hunting organizations out there for everything from elk to ruffed grouse, my guess is the number is not insignificant. That was my only point.


Mike
 
Posts: 21977 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:

We still wonder where the millions SCI gets from their blackmail go??

Remember, they make millions every year, what is being done with it towards actual conservation??


My take on it is that SCI is pretty much like every other "media" organisation and generates, reports and feeds off its own news and reportage - and its own importance! For those involved and employed its an end in itself.

I do remember through a friend offering SCI the chance to become involved both financially and practically in a black rhino conservation project in the Selous - not interested in the slightest.

I'd contrast this with BASC here (British Association for Shooting andConservation) which, whilst being a long way from perfect does take an active role in pure conservation projects - conserve in order to hunt.
 
Posts: 204 | Location: The frozen north of Scotland | Registered: 01 July 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tendrams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Opus1:
That's the proverbial million dollar question. And one that has been asked over and over again with no clear answer and no proof that much of anything has been accomplished. That's why so many of us stopped supporting them.


I know SCIF is a non-profit (don't know if SCI is). If so, why not just request their tax forms which I believe are public. At least the 990 forms would be which might say a good bit about the org in this regard.
 
Posts: 2472 | Registered: 06 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of billrquimby
posted Hide Post
quote:
I wonder if someone had made an exceptional, one of the kind convention auction donation late in the publication cycle if SCI would have found a way to work it into the magazine? Yes, at this point I am a cynic when it comes to the efforts of SCI to get its act together. Mike


Mike: It's been almost two decades since I had anything to do with SCI's publications, but I doubt if drop-dead deadlines set by outside suppliers, such as pre-press preparers, press schedulers, and the U.S. Post Office and overseas drop shippers have changed much. Changes could be made early in our two-month production cycle to accommodate a big donation, but it would be virtually impossible later on. Missing the later deadlines would cause later mailing dates and bring out a bunch of angry advertisers with timely ads demanding refunds.

Skyline: Elected positions are filled by volunteers who are paid only for their actual expenses. Don't know about now, but when I was in charge of the club's magazine, newspapers and record books, the club's publications were profitable.


Bill Quimby
 
Posts: 2633 | Location: tucson and greer arizona | Registered: 02 February 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia