Does anyone know what the new left wing Botswana Government's policy on hunting is?

quote:

Originally posted by the Pom:
Does anyone know what the new left wing Botswana Government's policy on hunting is?

Depends who pays them!

I am very curious about this as well. I’m booked for Botswana in July 2026. Government changes always make me nervous in Africa….

[/QUOTE]Depends who pays them! [/QUOTE]

100%!

According to press reports, the need to create jobs and diversify the economy, along with the need to curb rising corruption, were key reasons the previous regime was ousted.

Interfering with the nation's hunting industry would not advance any of those goals.

We shall see.

I have seen first hand how "creating jobs" works in Africa.

Employ people in jobs that are totally worthless, just to report more people are employed.

Instead of creating jobs that actually DO something useful for society!

Left wing government's economic decision may not always be entirely logical. Allowing uncontrolled poaching could be more popular with their own supporters and stopping legal hunting would be popular with their donor countries. Botswana hunters, brace yourselves!

quote:

Originally posted by the Pom:
Left wing government's economic decision may not always be entirely logical. Allowing uncontrolled poaching could be more popular with their own supporters and stopping legal hunting would be popular with their donor countries. Botswana hunters, brace yourselves!

Exactly my concern, especially with government concessions. Definitely has me nervous about my scheduled elephant hunt in GH10. But let’s hope for the best…

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:
I have seen first hand how "creating jobs" works in Africa.

Employ people in jobs that are totally worthless, just to report more people are employed.

Instead of creating jobs that actually DO something useful for society!

Governments shouldn't create jobs, they should create the circumstances in which companies can create jobs.

I was planning on finally hunting Botswana in 2026., and booking in a couple months. I guess I'll wait and see what the leftists do.

Yeah! At one point if you went to a gas station in RSA you'd have a mob of people descend on your vehicle to pump gas, wash your windshield etc. when 2 people at most could of handled everything.

Mark

https://www.mmegi.bw/news/govt...on-from-tourism/news

Gov’t to stop revenue repatriation from tourism
Friday, December 06, 2024


For decades, Batswana had been piling pressure on policymakers to open up the tourism industry to them
Spira Tlhankane



With foreign-owned entities dominating Botswana’s tourism sector and leading the repatriation of revenue, government has revealed that it will tighten legislation and enforcement measures to ensure that all revenue earned by tourism activities remains in the country.

Currently, much of the billions of pula flowing in the tourism sector are in the hands of foreign-owned companies, meaning a lot of it is repatriated out of the country. The sector contributes billions of pula to the overall economy. The Minister of Environment and Tourism, Wynter Mmolotsi, told Parliament this week that his ministry is aware of revenue repatriation from the tourism sector. He added this occurs when taxpaying entities transfer money earned overseas back to the country where they are based. “My Ministry advocates that all revenue generated from tourism licensed operations should reach Botswana and be reported accurately in Botswana for the following reasons; to minimise leakages, strengthen the local economy through the circulation of money in the local economy, increase local investments, reduce the possibility of tax evasion,” Mmolotsi said. To remedy this, he disclosed that his ministry has kick-started the process of reviewing the Tourism Act of 2009 with the intention for this to be considered by Parliament during the August 2025 sitting.

He added that the aim of this review is among others to provide a legislative instrument that compels tourists to pay in full in Botswana. Mmolotsi was responding to a question from Tati East Member of Parliament (MP), Tapologo Furniture. Furniture had asked the minister whether he was aware that revenue repatriation from the tourism sector; and to specifically explain what he intends to do to remedy the situation. In response Mmolotsi said government expects that mandating all payments to be made in local currency will prevent cash outflows while maximising the economic benefits of tourism for the local population. “In addition, stiffer fines for non-compliance and heightened monitoring of financial activities will be enforced to dissuade any attempts to circumvent the new requirements.

Furthermore, my ministry will finalise the Tourism Leakages Study by January 2025 which aims to identify areas of leakages within the tourism sector as well as mitigation measures. “That notwithstanding, my ministry will continue to collaborate with stakeholders such as the Ministry of Trade and Ministry of Finance in mitigating revenue repatriation in the tourism sector,” he further pointed out. Foreign-owned safari companies or non-indigenous Batswana dominating the country's tourism industry has not only led to the repatriation of revenue but it has also led to the domination of management positions by expatriates and lower salaries for citizen workers. Hence, in April 2021 Parliament approved the revised Tourism Policy. Before Mmolotsi announced this week that government will review the Tourism Act of 2009, in 2021 there were questions about whether the then-new Tourism Policy would finally empower Batswana. For decades, Batswana had been piling pressure on policymakers to open up the industry to them and enable citizens to access opportunities in tourism beyond just mere employment. Before reviewing the policy, a process that took 13 years of planning, the government admitted that the first Tourism Policy developed in 1990, had outlived its usefulness considering the competitive tourism environment Botswana operates within.

Therefore, the Ministry of Environment and Tourism felt it became necessary that it should be reviewed to align it with the current developments and trends in the tourism industry. The policy called for a legislative arrangement indicating that the Botswana Tourism Organisation Act (2009) is amongst the various pieces of legislation and policies in Botswana that affect the tourism sector and can hamper the competitiveness of the tourism sector if not harmonised. “In view of the dynamic and complex nature of the tourism sector, it is therefore necessary to come up with measures to strengthen the legal and regulatory environment for tourism. There is also a need for a multi-sectoral consultative mechanism for the engagement of other key players in order to harmonise the legislation and ensure effective and efficient delivery of services in the tourism sector,” read the policy.

The policy also acknowledged that there is limited citizen participation in tourism where prime tourism opportunities such as prime lodges and higher-end hotels remain in the hands of a few dominant operators and therefore citizen participation in tourism is for lower investments. “Furthermore, joint ventures between citizens and foreigners have been extremely limited. Very few tourism-related companies have floated their shares for wider citizen participation. Successful true partnerships and joint ventures between communities and tourism business operators are few and far between,” stated the policy. But in March this year, the late and former Environment and Tourism minister, Dumezweni Mthimkhulu, revealed that there was a rising interest amongst Batswana in the tourism business. He disclosed that as of the end of January 2024, the Ministry licensed 3,236 100% citizen-owned operators, 286 joint ventures, and 296 non-citizen-owned enterprises compared to a target of 250 per year. The late Mthimkhulu highlighted then that the surge in interest stimulated employment in the sector.

If foreign-based operators are denied the export of a percentage of their earnings they will shut down and leave as it would equate to working for nothing; would be unable to cover expenses for their agencies abroad and investments in Botswana.

The local Botswana operators will not/do not have the marketing skills and contacts nor will they have the trust that their counterparts have built with their clientele portfolio.

quote:

Originally posted by fulvio:
If foreign-based operators are denied the export of a percentage of their earnings they will shut down and leave as it would equate to working for nothing; would be unable to cover expenses for their agencies abroad and investments in Botswana.

The local Botswana operators will not/do not have the marketing skills and contacts nor will they have the trust that their counterparts have built with their clientele portfolio.

Yep…sounds like a disaster which may well collapse the very thing they are trying to take over or at least “bring in house”