From what I have read about the original design of this caliber, it is perhaps the most specifically designed caliber of all.
It would seem to me that of the bigger calibers it is the 416s that are master of nothing. There recoil takes them into a class where compromises have to be made, so what do they offer over the bigger 45s. In either case you are compromised by recoil.
Surely the immense success of the 375 and the failure of the various 40s, such as the 416 Rigby, 404 and 425 Westley Richards does say something. 416 Remingtons do not exactly appear to be thick on the ground
On the smaller side, the 30/06 and 338 operate at similar velocity levels to the 375, but history does show that most people with some practice can go up to 375 recoil, but not much over it if the rifle is to be used a lot and from any type of improvised field rest.
History also shows us that the 30/06 type trajectory is more than ample for nearly all shooting conditions. The 375 simply offers that trajectory with a bullet size limited by recoil considerations.
Mike
Whew, Mike! - don't you feel better already just talking about rifles and Africa?
Check the record....Finn Aggard and a long, long list of others have said this over the past 40 years and it continues to be true today. Power (even excess power) is nice but accuracy is final and that describes the .375 wheter it is the venerable .375 H&H or my more modern 9.53 Lazzeroni HellCat.
I guess I just pissed most everyone off.
But then, I guess I'm pretty much jack of all, master of none myself.
Maybe I did get the right rifle?...
Bill
I am all set around here anyway with one of the factions because I have a .375 H&H "improved" too.
I am not practicle, and not paticularly nostalgic. If I had one, I'm sure I'd use it for 95% of my hunting, and be content. I doubt I will ever by one, and if I get a magnum length action, I'd likely build something bigger.
Your mention in another post about the 350 rigby has me intrigued, I'm considering re-chambering my 35 whelen ackley, provided it would clean up, anybody have a dimensioned drawing of a 350 Rigby case?
I will dig out my Cartridges of the World and put upthe 350 Rigby numbers.
Brass is Bertram and I guess Kynoch etc. American Hunting Rifles are listing it as one of their chamberings.
It just seems such a natural for someone with a 416 Rigby in CZ to get a CZ 375 and rebarrel.
Back to 375 H&H.
Most people who elimate the 375 doit either on the small game end orthe very big game.
I wonder if these days that anyone would really shoot enough real big animals for a 416 to really show up over a 375.
On small animals I have used the 270, 308, 300 Win and 375 H&H on roos and pigs more than any other calibers.
If measured over the years the 375 has actually done the best.
Uusally the others when they have problems is bullets being too hard.
But I guess the 375 with round nose bullets works OKno matter what Hornady etc down with their bullets over the years.
The only area where the 375 has come up short is when compared to the 270 in bench rest rifles being used in the field. In a 13 pound gun with 2 ounce Jewell a 270 is about as big as you can go and just let the rifle balance on one sandbag on its own.
But once the rifle takes on a sporting rifle configuration, I have not been handicapped by the 375.
By the way, I have never seen anyone use much bigger than the 375 when both accuracy and high volume shooting are combined.
Mike
I'd have to agreee about the .375 being an all around chambering. YOu can swat the small stuff and the big stuff too!
I wouldn't agree about the failure of the .416. I feel that the .416 by virture of it's bullet design gives very good penetration! It is leaps and bounds ahead of the .458 bullet!
I have no experience with the 404 Jeffery or the 425 WR. I do know that Ray Atkinson prizes his 404 almost as much as he does "Sweet Thang". I'm sure the .423 bullet out of that 404 Jeffery can get the need attention what you hit with it!
As for me, I would have already purchased a CZ550 in .416 Rigby, but I waiting to try someone's first to see if the recoil is an issue with me.
When it comes down to it, you really need to take what you are comfortable shooting to Africa. Discounting Dangerous Game, what you use to swat deer and elk in the states and Roo in Australia should kill all the plains game you can afford!
I'll be taking the .375 as one of my rifles next trip!
Rusty
We band of brothers!
[This message has been edited by Rusty (edited 01-18-2002).]
If clymers #'s can be trusted, the 35 whelen AI is .460" at the body/shoulder line, the 350 rigby is .4512", but, the body is longer, and where the ackley is .460", the rigby is .461"
If the case is just a beltless H&H, I'm classless enough to turn belts off and save the premium for properly stamped cases.
I'd debated the 358 Norma re-chamber, but I think a 350 Rigby is calling, much better fit to the rifle when I achieve its final configuration.
Bullet .358
Neck .380
Shoulder .443
Base .519
Rim .525
Case 2.75
Cartridge 3.60
Holland's .375: One Planet, One Rifle!
Sarge
You can see from Wachtel'spost that it is just slighly bigger than the H&H across the base.
I would guess that H&Hs with the belt removed would be about like using 404 Jeffrey cases in the Rem Ultra chambers.
Bertram brass being soft isnot really an isue for 585 Nyati since your headwil fall off and roll along the ground before the brass gives out, but that would apply to the 350 Rigby.
Actually the few thou undersize on the H&H brass would not be a problem because the brass is just so much thicker on that part of the case just in front of the solid head.
I guess the trick would be to use H&H cases and have a few head stamped 350 Rigby cases (Kynoch would be ideal) for when you feel like putting on the tweed cab and jacket.
Mike
An interesting dimension for the 350 Rigby is the 2.75"case lenght.
35 bullets such as 250 Hornady when seated to the cannelure produce an OAL greater than 3.6" when seated in a 2.85 case. Kind of like the 338 Ultra being 2.75" instead of the 2.85 of the 300 and 375 Ultras.
And don't forget you can get 310 grain Woodleighs
By the way, they shot extremely well from the 3 358STA barrels I tried. All with .357" groove and 1 in 14 twist.
Mike
Let's see, I personally know of a buffalo, eland, 2 zebra, blue wildebeest, waterbuck and kudu that seem to think the 375 H&H is a pretty good choice. In August, I'll be convincing some other African animals of the 375's overall ability. Will relate those testimonials this coming September.
Regards,
Terry
This isn't a map for anyone but me, and for me it is a well worn map! If I had nothing else, I would be happy, and would hunt anything on Earth without getting too nervous!
------------------
..Mac >>>===(x)===>
also DUGABOY1
DUGABOY DESIGNS
Collector/trader of fine double rifles, and African wildlife art
Saeed has said, at almost no time would a 416 of been a benefit, over the 375. However, he's only shot 80+ buffalo, so what does he know:lol:>?
More bullets, more buffalo, and the best all around cartridge ever??
Forgotten in this discussion is the premium you have to pay for a 416 or bigger, rifle, cartridges, over the 375.
VALUE. The 375 H&H is simply the best VALUE big bore, adequate for anything, ever...
gs
Now when you get down to the nut cuttin', these jack-of-all-trades cartridges can and do take in a lot of hunting. In a practical sense they are the true shining stars of the hunting world, even though they lack the "star-power" and situation-specific usefulness under extreme and demanding cicumstances compared to cartridges like the .458 Lott, .500 NE, or on the flip side, something like the .300 Ultra Mag.
All of that aside, I love the .375 H&H for the very reason that it is THE true jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none standard cartridge of the world. So many people, especially here in the USA, wax exstatic over the versatility of the .30-06, yet the .375 H&H will do everything that the .30-06 will do and so very much more; all the while remaining a highly shootable and widely-available cartridge that nearly everyone can master with a little work and committment.
I've always felt well-armed and never under or over-gunned when I've carried a .375 H&H. Just about everything I shot with has gone down in a very decisive manner, and those animals that ran off after the shot seldom went very far. The one exception being an elk that ran for 200 yards or so with his lungs shot to pieces.
I think the .375 H&H must be good for at least 95% of all hunting world-wide, which really isn't all that bad for an old has-been, master-of-none cartridge with an archaic belt!
AD
It is not as good as the 416, 404 on Buffalo, Elephant and Lion and thats for sure. It isn't as good as the 338 or 300 for plainsgame, but it sure will work on both....
I do believe that the 416 Rem is a better all around caliber for everything, if one is limited to one gun in Africa...A 300 or 350 gr. 416 really cooks in the velocity dept and the 400 and 450 gr. bullets sure are good on the big stuff..
I consider all the above as plain simple fact but I will never sell my 375 H&H, by Holland and Holland, its an old beat up war horse being restored as we speak, and one of my favorite rifles...
------------------
Ray Atkinson
Besides, my .375 H&H (a Remington 700 Classic -- 1996 model -- with a 4X Leupold scope in Leupold QR mounts) is sometimes my most accurate rifle. For example, my last trip to the shooting range was Thursday, 1-17-02. I shot 5 rifles at that trip: a 6mm Rem., a .260, a .270, a 30-06, and the .375 H&H. The .375 H&H gave me the best group of the day -- 0.65 inch at 100 yards with 270 gr. Speer boattails ahead of 82.5 gr. of H4350, Winchester brass, WLR primer, 3.66 inch overall length. My best group that day with the 6mm was 0.71, with the .260 it was 1.57, with the .270 it was 1.36, and with the 30-06 it was 1.79
[This message has been edited by LE270 (edited 01-19-2002).]
Here's a link to the article on the .375 H&H that you referred to:
http://www.african-hunter.com/site/classcart/375hhmag_01.htm
And here's another about using the .375 H&H on elephants:
http://www.african-hunter.com/site/firearms/375onelephant_01.htm
Cheers,
Alan
------------------
Internet Editor, African Hunter Magazine Online
eEditor@african-hunter.com
http://www.african-hunter.com/site/index.htm
~Risk has a tendency to pack up and leave town when certainty arrives
[This message has been edited by Alan Bunn (edited 01-19-2002).]
------------------
Ray Atkinson
Both articles are good reads...........this is a good thread, too, guys!
------------------
rlda07052
#1) "I know, from using the rifle myself, that the .375 H&H can safely be taken against any animal anywhere in Africa".....John "Pondoro: Taylor
#2) "...still remains the one outstanding choice for a hunter who wants a rifle that works well on everything from little gazelles to five-ton elephants. My .375 H&H has done exactly that, in addition to having given quite satisfactory results on the 48 buffalo taken with it".....Finn Aagaard
#3) "I think it is arguably the fiest all-around big game cartridge ever designed. If I could have but one rifle for all African hunitng, I would without any hesitation choose a .375 H&H." ....Finn Aagaard again.
I won't post any quotes from Boddington or
Capstick as we would get off on another tangent. You guys give up yet?
Lets us say I am heading to Africa to shoot one buffalo and some plains animals....zebra, wildebeest and similar and an eland.
So on my first trip I take a pair of 375s.
What sort of differences would you expect there to be if I took a 300 Mag and 450 Mag instead.
Mike
I concurr that the 416 is a better alternative as it will do anything the 375 can do and a whole lot more, if one can take recoil out of the equasion, don't you agree. A 300 or 350 gr. 416 at 2900 plus makes a fair to midland plainsgame round and a 400 gr.is a killer of all big game....
Again I repeat, I will always own and shoot a 375 H&H, but I do believe just plain common since tells us the 416 Remington is now the king...
------------------
Ray Atkinson
Hmpf!
Sarge
From your post:
"I concurr that the 416 is a better alternative as it will do anything the 375 can do and a whole lot more, if one can take recoil out of the equasion, don't you agree"
A 375, 416 Remington and 460 Wby all have similar velocities for bullets of the same sectional density.
So "on paper" the big 45s are the way to go.
But you can't take recoil of the equation.
A copy of an email I just received from Sierra as to will they make 416 projectiles.
Mike, that has been a caliber that I suggest each year that we make, but they have studied the market and decided that it was just to small a market to try doing it. Sorry.
Carroll Pilant
Looks like no one buying the 416 Story.
Mike
What would happen if either your 300 or 450 went on the blink.
Mike
------------------
Happiness is a warm double and a bloody spear, but a 375 or a 416 will do just fine!
RAB
As a keen gun owner and one who also has been down the Echols road, surely having to use the PHs junk box 375 would not be an ideal outcome for you.
In other words in your case and certainly mine, the gun is far more than a means to an end.
In my case if I go to Africa with a pair of 375s, I will do as many have before me over the last 90 years, that is, have success.
If one of my rifles goes on the blink, I am still in fine shape and the trip remains unchanged.
Also, I could have one 375 zeroed for 300 grainers and the other with 250 grain premium bullets at close to 3000 with Reloader 15.
The enjoyment of your trip is very much dependent on not having a rifle go out of action, especially the 300.
Mike