THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  African Big Game Hunting    Mugabe voted third-greatest African of all time

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Mugabe voted third-greatest African of all time
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Mugabe voted third-greatest African of all time

London, United Kingdom

25 August 2004 17:24

Zimbabwe's controversial President Robert Mugabe was voted the third-greatest African of all time, topped only by South Africa's Nelson Mandela and former Ghanaian president Kwame Nkrumah, in a survey for New African magazine, it was announced on Wednesday.

Mugabe, widely criticised outside Zimbabwe for stifling dissent and crippling the economy of his once-prosperous Southern African nation, is an "interesting" choice because "a high-profile campaign in the media has painted him in [a] bad light", the New African wrote.

The London-based magazine said responses flooded in after the survey was launched last December to nominate the top 100 most influential Africans or people of African descent.

Heroes of independence movements in Africa and African-American figures in the United States figure prominently on the list.

Patrice Lumumba, Congo's first post-colonial prime minister, ranks sixth, followed by US civil rights leader Martin Luther King.

Pele, the legendary Brazilian soccer star, comes in 17th, followed by Jamaican reggae singer Bob Marley, numbering among those called "Diasporans" by New African.

Radical civil rights leader Malcolm X, at ninth, is a rank above United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan, from Ghana, who comes just ahead of US boxer Muhammad Ali.

Few women made the cut. The highest-ranked female, at 12th, is Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, former wife of the South African president. Others include the dynamic duo of tennis, American sisters Venus and Serena Williams (together ranked 73rd), and ancient Egyptian queen Nefertiti at number 81.

The magazine noted that most of the top 100 are from Africa's post-colonial period.

"Have people forgotten Africa's history? Must this worry us, as a people?" it asked.

The list appears in the August-September issue of New African, which has a circulation of roughly 30 000 across dozens of countries. It said this is the first such survey it has carried out in a decade. -- Sapa-AFP
 
Posts: 9486 | Location: Chicago | Registered: 23 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Balla Balla
posted Hide Post
To be rather cynical, it seems that often greatness is measured in Africa terms by the number of people killed under one's regime, I wonder why Idi Amin did not make the top three !!!

Regards, Peter
 
Posts: 3331 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Isnt that the same guy who won his countries lottery 7 times???
 
Posts: 318 | Location: People's Republic of New York | Registered: 10 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
As in the "Great" as per the great *#^* up he has made of Zimbabwe. I guess that is why most of Africa is destitute because of their idea of "greatness".

I guess in the back of their minds is the knowledge they can always trot of with begging bowls in hand to America,Europe, Australia, the IMF etc and appeal for help from the bleeding hearts.
 
Posts: 789 | Location: Australia | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post

I would have selected Idi Amin or Mommar Khadaffi.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Not just every two bit sociopath can turn the "jewel of Africa" into the dark side of the moon in two short decades.
JCN
 
Posts: 7158 | Location: Snake River | Registered: 02 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BwanaBob
posted Hide Post
Unbelieveable, it just goes to show the power of propaganda and what lies you can get away with when you suppress freedom of speech and the independance of the media.

In contrast, I recently saw a book entitled "The 100 worst tyrants in History" (or words to that effect). There were all the usual candidates; Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc, but there was also a chapter for Robert Gabriel Mugabe. I wish I could airdrop a couple of thousand copies of that book into every corner of Africa. It makes me angry that that bastard can get away with mass murder and oppresion, on a scale not unlike Saddam Hussein. And, at the same time, turn a fabulous country (and my favourite place on the whole planet) into a basket case.

When is the free world going to do something about him? If you like, I'll volunteer to take the shot if someone can just get me the hell out of Dodge after the deed!
 
Posts: 909 | Location: Blackheath, NSW, Australia | Registered: 26 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
BwanaBob

You along with 250 000 ex Rhodesians!!!
 
Posts: 789 | Location: Australia | Registered: 24 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of hikerbum
posted Hide Post
it sounds like this was just a popularity contest. He probably found a way to stuff the ballot box for this "contest"
 
Posts: 2597 | Location: Western New York | Registered: 30 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Will
posted Hide Post
I think it is more indicative of the mentality of the voters. It is also why every southern African country is destined to resort to the social structure of tribal warfare.

And there is no room for wildlife sanctuaries, taking the high road, intellectual decisions, or an semblence of "English" law. Hope springs eternal, but show me the proof that any such country has done anything but run toward ruination.

And it is not only confined to southern Africa.
 
Posts: 19362 | Location: Ocala Flats | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
My vote goes to Hannibal.

George
 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Certainly not politically correct to say the following, but indeed I'm surprised no one else has--Did you all not notice that all the "people" listed are colored, the voters were almost totally colored, and the magazine is a left wing African colored magazine, meaning?????? Meaning squawt!
 
Posts: 747 | Location: Nevada, USA | Registered: 22 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

I think it is more indicative of the mentality of the voters. It is also why every southern African country is destined to resort to the social structure of tribal warfare.

And there is no room for wildlife sanctuaries, taking the high road, intellectual decisions, or an semblence of "English" law. Hope springs eternal, but show me the proof that any such country has done anything but run toward ruination.

And it is not only confined to southern Africa.




AMEN!!!!
 
Posts: 318 | Location: People's Republic of New York | Registered: 10 April 2004Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
George, As admirable, perhaps, as Hannibal was, he was the son of Hamilcar (Barca/Barcas) "The Phoenician", of a semitic people on the eastern shores of the Mediteranean, situated in the area of modern day Lebanon. Carthage was initially a colony of the sea-faring Phoenicians. Hannibal has been popularized as an "African" in many of the Afro-American revisionary history books but in fact he was not.
 
Posts: 11017 | Registered: 14 December 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
Hannibal was as much an African as any modern day Zimbabwean, Namibian, South African, etc., of European descent. But, of course, I am being argumentative.

Put more succinctly, when it comes right down to it, the Leakeys and others have amply proved we are all Africans.

That would put Bobby Lootgobbler at about 65,000,000,000th on the list of great Africans (going back a few generations, of course).
 
Posts: 13625 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Not within the parameters of the survey, which quite obviously solicits the offering of a black candidate. But, yes, you're right ... you are being intentionally argumentative.
 
Posts: 11017 | Registered: 14 December 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NitroX
posted Hide Post
Mt vote goes to Ian Smith who obviously didn't rate too well.
 
Posts: 10138 | Location: Wine Country, Barossa Valley, Australia | Registered: 06 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
Being argumentative can be a good thing--but only when it's done intentionally.

If it weren't for we argumentative types, no one would challenge any rules, including the ridiculous rules of this survey, not to mention its even more ridiculous results.

All "real" Africans are black-skinned people who "come from" Africa, whatever that means? Where is that carved in stone? Who accepts a rule just because someone claims it's a rule? What does it mean to be "from" somewhere?

More to the point, don't tell a fifth, sixth, seventh, etc., generation white South African or Namibian farmer or rancher that he's not a "real" African, unless you want a little intentional argument for your trouble.

But we also shouldn't forget that stupid and unjust rules--i.e., the institutionalized legal system of apartheid--were responsible for bringing Mugabe to power in the first place.

The irony is that Robber Bob has played the "freedom fighter" role to the point where he's now a bigger oppressor than anyone he replaced, and he's able to get away with it Scot-free.

Because of his "savior" status, he can blame every one of Zimbabwe's self-inflicted problems on the "white man"--whoever he is--with complete and utter impunity. His countrymen, who were victims of white oppression for decades, all too readily believe his lies--and now he's become the third greatest African of all time.

Ahead of Ramses the Great, Shaka Zulu, Cecil Rhodes, and, yes, even Hannibal. What a myopic and asinine joke.

The whole idea of conducting a survey to pronounce the "greatest" anything is grounded on excluding those who aren't "qualified"--which generally means anyone the surveyor doesn't like.
 
Posts: 13625 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
All granted, of course. I think it telling that "New African" itself noted that most of the top 100 are from Africa's post-colonial period and to its' credit, goes on to pose the question:

"Have people forgotten Africa's history? Must this worry us, as a people?"

Despite a 35 year glut of revisionist African &/or Afro-American history, participants in the survey failed to offer up a particular Nubian Pharaoh, Kushite King or Queen or some early member of Sudanic royalty? They should be worried.
 
Posts: 11017 | Registered: 14 December 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RLI
posted Hide Post
Ian Smith
 
Posts: 276 | Location: Victoria, Australia | Registered: 24 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NitroX
posted Hide Post
What does RLI stand for? Rhodesian Light Inf ?
 
Posts: 10138 | Location: Wine Country, Barossa Valley, Australia | Registered: 06 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of gdupuis
posted Hide Post
There should be a new Shaka that rises up from South Africa to 'stabilize' or 'liberate' south africans at the same scale the original Shaka did. There will definitively be more space for the elephants.

What's pissing me off is that it's a lost cause
 
Posts: 91 | Location: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: 27 December 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  African Big Game Hunting    Mugabe voted third-greatest African of all time

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: