Those of us who hunt understand that the selective taking of animals aids in the general health of the species. There are hundreds of peer-reviewed studies that demonstrate this. But can a scientific case be made against hunting?
Our good friends at Blood Origins show that anti-hunting arguments are more based on feeling than fact. Before making decisions that can impact wildlife and the many communities that depend on them, make sure to follow Robert Heinlein's advice: " ...what are the facts? Shun wishful thinking, ignore divine revelation, forget what “the stars foretell,” avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors think, never mind the unguessable “verdict of history” – what are the facts, and to how many decimal places?

https://youtu.be/bMMpH2f5rnc