One of Us
| I always had good results with the Hornady production from back then. I never used the Wichesters, so can't comment. |
| |
One of Us
| Gunbug...if you look at the bottom of the hornady's I believe you should see the steel sleeve...Maybe so for the Winny's but YOU could grind half off and look at the core.. Mike Michael Podwika... DRSS bigbores and hunting www.pvt.co.za " MAKE THE SHOT " 450#2 Famars |
| Posts: 6768 | Location: Wyoming, Pa. USA | Registered: 17 April 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I think you have better choices today if you're planning a hunt. |
| Posts: 2627 | Location: Where the pine trees touch the sky | Registered: 06 December 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| They are both excellent bullets in both solid and soft point form. The Winchester solid is what gave the 458 Win. imeasurable respect with African game departments. The powder charge was the problem not the bullets. I would hoard them and only use them only to hunt with.
465H&H |
| Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Thank You all. I will try them out i have 500 of them so i guess with global warming i might have to defend my house from marauding eli's and rhinos. Seriously they look like they are going to kick pretty hard compared to my cast loads. Dan |
| Posts: 201 | Location: Mackenzie BC | Registered: 15 February 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| If they are round nosed, they'll never penetrate as far as a flat-nosed bullet, as counterintuitive as that sounds.
Personally, were I to need a solid, it's because I need penetration. And that means a flat-nosed solid. So I'd use those for practice. |
| Posts: 444 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 07 November 2001 |
IP
|
|