Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Quote: | ||
|
One of Us |
Quote:Quote: As you can see, I have not denigrated anyone for using a vintage double, and I take offense at the false accusation. | |||
|
one of us |
Quote:Quote:Quote: 500grains, If you will recall, at the time I made that statement I was under the impression that your prior response (see below) was in reference to me, since it was posted as a response to my previous post, as in [Re: mbogo375] . I think that most people would have thought that it was directed toward them if it was posted in response to their post. Quote: I was a bit hot under the collar at the time I made that post (for my "perceived" slight in your post-which I am sorry for misunderstanding, as well as the comment to Mac), and my choice of words may not have been the best. In respect to what I thought was a reference to myself, I felt that the comment was at the least condescending, if not denigrating. Apparently I misunderstood your above noted post, and because of that I can understand your position, however it seems that you are not willing to attempt to understand mine. In my response I pointed out the part of your post concerning Mac, but did not point out the other post that I thought concerned me, since you stated that it was not in reference to me. I should have made that clear at the time, but obviously I did not. Could it be that you are "focused on getting your feelings hurt" as well? In any case, I tried to extend the olive branch of peace, and you chose not to accept it. If, however, you are willing to try and understand why I felt like I did at the time I made that post, then the offer still stands. Jim | |||
|
One of Us |
Jim, I did not intend to start and argument and I feel my statements were misunderstood. There have been a lot of unnecessary pot shots taken on double brands and vintages across a couple of forums which appears to put all of us on edge. Best wishes and good shooting. | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: 500grains, Well said, and thanks. I certainly contributed to the misunderstanding as well. Since I don't follow most of the other forums (other than Nitro Express.com occasionally), I was not aware of the rest of the situation. I don't dislike modern doubles, (surprise, surprise ). In fact I had a Searcy 470 for a short while, and would like to have one of his new PH models in 450x3.25. If I ever get around to ordering it (and paying for it ), I think it would make a great shooter that can go through a lot of ammo without coming off face. I like the extra action contouring compared to the old field grade which, as Butch says, takes extra time, but I think that it makes for a nicer looking rifle. Best regards and good shooting, Jim | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia