THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MODERN MILITARY RIFLES FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Modern Military Rifles    Reloading for 5.56 on an AR platform questions?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Reloading for 5.56 on an AR platform questions?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Using 5.56 brass, what pressure signs do I need to be on the look out for with an AR platform rifle. Can they handle excessive pressures (within reason) reliably? Almost all of the reloading data I have are for 223 Rem. I know the 5.56 mil-spec brass is stouter than 223 brass and the military loads it hotter, but how much hotter? I would like to use H335 and 4895 powders and juice it up as much as I can. Any expertise on this matter would be appreciated.


"The right to bear arms" insures your right to freedom, free speech, religion, your choice of doctors, etc. ....etc. ....etc....
-----------------------------------one trillion seconds = 31,709 years-------------------
 
Posts: 1521 | Location: Just about anywhere in Texas | Registered: 26 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
If you want to play that game you probably need to convert your rifle to an adjustable gas block. That will allow some degree of control as you experiment with different loads.

There are other things like heavier springs and weighted buffers but remember that more pressure means more stress on the whole system, and there will be some price to pay in durability. Or you may end up with a rifle that depends on that specific load range for reliable cycling and is a PIA with over-the-counter ammo.

Try AR15.com if want to talk to folks that have been there and done it.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11143 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The AR can handle crazy pressures without killing you. Start low and work up so that you don't have to find out. Start out at least 10% below reloading manual maximums.

Watch for rim lifts, ejector scrapes, pierced primers and loose primer pockets. If you start to get any of those, back off at least 1/2gr.

Don't shoot your 5.56 AR ammo in a bolt action. Most bolt actions are chambered for .223. The difference between 5.56 and .223 is that the .223 has a shorter throat with less freebore. Less freebore yields higher pressures.
 
Posts: 539 | Registered: 14 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
BECoole, there was a article in the National Rifleman mag. a few months ago regarding the differences between the 223 Remmy and the 5.56 x45 military round. The freebore you mentioned was one diff. Another difference between the two was the 5.56 has a thicker walled case that, I believe is harder in the body area by design. I will have to reread the article to verify the hardness thing. They also mentioned that the loadings were to higher pressures for the mil-spec round. That is why I asked if anyone knows about the two powders I mentioned and about how much higher I could go on an AR platform.


"The right to bear arms" insures your right to freedom, free speech, religion, your choice of doctors, etc. ....etc. ....etc....
-----------------------------------one trillion seconds = 31,709 years-------------------
 
Posts: 1521 | Location: Just about anywhere in Texas | Registered: 26 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Rae59

Using LC cases, 52-55 gr bullets consider 26.5 gr of H335 as a max load for your AR. I've measured the pressures of numerous commercial and milsurp loads. That load is one I have used for years and it falls right in the middle of milsurp pressures and equals milsurp velocities when 55 gr m193 bullets are used. Also use a CCI 450, WSR or Rem 7 1/2 primer for consistent ignition in cold weather (below freezing).

Larry Gibson
 
Posts: 1489 | Location: University Place, WA | Registered: 18 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
If you want reference points, SAMMI MAP for the 223 is 50,000 CUP and the 5.56 NATO is 60,000 CUP. That's CUP, not psi!


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11143 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Collins
posted Hide Post
This is a GREAT site for target loads.
A question you should answer is "why?"
http://www.6mmbr.com/223Rem.html


Collins
Airgunner / 458 SOCOMer/ 45-70er / 458 Lotter

www.actionairgun.com LIVE NOW

 
Posts: 2327 | Location: The Sunny South! St. Augustine, FL | Registered: 29 May 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rae59:
BECoole, there was a article in the National Rifleman mag. a few months ago regarding the differences between the 223 Remmy and the 5.56 x45 military round.


Look at the link posted by Collins. You'll see there is practically zero difference in the case weights or capacities of military and commercial .223/5.56.
Now, commercial .223 is indeed loaded lighter than military. That is because short throats cause higher pressure. But, if you fire a .223 in a SAAMI .223 chamber and a 5.56 in a 5.56 chamber, the pressures will for all practical purposes be identical. But if you fire 5.56 in a SAAMI .223 chamber, you'll get the higher pressure as listed by tiggertate.

As far as the case head hardness goes, there is no difference except with Federal cases. Federal devised a way to draw cases with one less draw operation. This results in softer heads because of a lack of work hardening. Nobody really loves these cases, not even the military.

You can load it until you get the pressure signs I listed. Some components, like Winchester primers and Federal cases won't take pressure like other components and will show signs early.

What month was the American Rifleman article? I seem to have overlooked it.

Keep in mind that as ambient temperature goes up, so may your pressures.
 
Posts: 539 | Registered: 14 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Collins
posted Hide Post
I had read that the only difference is that SAAMI has specs that are not included in the Mil spec.
But I KNOW the differences are insignificant when I bought a case of American Eagle .223 and they all were in LC brass with NATO headstamps. (not marked as .223)


Collins
Airgunner / 458 SOCOMer/ 45-70er / 458 Lotter

www.actionairgun.com LIVE NOW

 
Posts: 2327 | Location: The Sunny South! St. Augustine, FL | Registered: 29 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
BECoole, I want to say the American Rifleman article was in spring or summer of last year and not a few months ago as I said earlier. I will dig through my mags and find it to let you know for sure.


"The right to bear arms" insures your right to freedom, free speech, religion, your choice of doctors, etc. ....etc. ....etc....
-----------------------------------one trillion seconds = 31,709 years-------------------
 
Posts: 1521 | Location: Just about anywhere in Texas | Registered: 26 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MikeBurke
posted Hide Post
After shooting a lot of NRA highpower and pushing 69, 77, and 80 grain bullets to the ragged edge I discovered the few extra FPS were not worth the firing pins I ruined from piercing primers and digging blown primers out of the trigger group. When you are not fighting those things your scores actually go up.
 
Posts: 2953 | Registered: 26 March 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Don't shoot your 5.56 AR ammo in a bolt action. Most bolt actions are chambered for .223. The difference between 5.56 and .223 is that the .223 has a shorter throat with less freebore. Less freebore yields higher pressures.

You might then want to read about the Wylde chamber. It is designed to chamber both rounds...
 
Posts: 16534 | Location: Between my computer and the head... | Registered: 03 March 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
BECOOLE,I've torn my magazine rack apart and cannot find the article on 5.56/223 differences. I think I may have given it to my nephew. I am still looking. Hell it may have even been in 2007.My years have been joining together lately. In any event, one can write the American Rifleman and ask them which month it was in. In any event the bottom line to the article was DO NOT shoot 5.56x45 ammo in a gun marked 223 Rem.


"The right to bear arms" insures your right to freedom, free speech, religion, your choice of doctors, etc. ....etc. ....etc....
-----------------------------------one trillion seconds = 31,709 years-------------------
 
Posts: 1521 | Location: Just about anywhere in Texas | Registered: 26 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
http://www.thegunzone.com/556v223.html

http://ammo.ar15.com/ammo/

quote:
.223 Remington vs. 5.56: What’s In a Name


By BRYCE M. TOWSLEY field editor
American Rifleman – September 2007


Most gun guys know the history of the .223 Remington and that it - like so many of our popular cartridges - started life in the military. Because the military switched to metric designations sometime in the 1950s, this little .22-cal. cartridge was later called the 5.56x45 mm NATO (commonly referred to as "5.56x45 mm").

The 5.56x45 mm surfaced in 1957 as an experimental cartridge in the AR-15 rifle. The concept was to develop a smaller, lighter military cartridge that would still be traveling faster than the speed of sound at 500 yds., and this was accomplished by using a 55-gr. boattail bullet. The AR-15 evolved into the select-fire M16 rifle that was adopted by the military in 1964.

Even though it would ultimately kill off its own .222 Rem. and .222 Rem. Mag. cartridges, Remington was quick to act, and very shortly after the military adopted the 5.56x45 mm cartridge the firm brought out the civilian version, called the .223 Remington. Confusion followed.

The common misconception is that the two are the same; that 5.56x45 nun and .223 Rem. are the same dance partner, but with a different dress. This can lead to a dangerous situation. The outside case dimensions are the same, but there are enough other differences that the two are not completely interchangeable.


One big difference is pressure. It becomes a bit confusing, as the pressure for the two is not measured in the same way. The .223 Rem. is measured with either Copper Units of Pressure (c.u.p.) or-more recently-with a mid*case transducer in pounds-per*square-inch (p.s.i.). The military 5.56x45 mm cartridge is measured with a case mouth transducer. The different measuring methods prevent a direct comparison, as a case mouth transducer gives lower numbers on identical ammuni*tion when compared to those from a midcase transducer. That's because the pressure is measured later in the event, after the pres*sure has already peaked. Accord*ing to Jeff Hoffman, the owner of Black Hills Ammunition, military ammunition can be expected to hit 60,000 p.s.i., if measured on a Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI) mid-case system. Black Hills loads maximum average pressure is 55,000 p.s.i., while a 5.56x45 mm measured with a case mouth trans*ducer has a maximum average pressure of 58,700 p.s.i.

While the 5.56x45 mm chamber is slightly larger than the .223 Rem. chamber in just about every dimension, the primary difference is throat length, which can have a dramatic effect on pressure. The 5.56x45 mm has a longer throat in the chamber than the .223 Rem. The throat is also commonly called the leade, which is defined as a portion of the barrel directly in front of the chamber where the rifling has been conically removed to allow room for the seated bullet. Leade in a .223 Rem. chamber is usually 0.085", while in a 5.56x45 mm chamber the leade is typically 0.162", or almost twice as much as in the .223 Rem. chamber. Also, the throat angle is different between the two chambers, and that can affect pressure rise and peak pressure.

SAAMI regulates cartridge overall length, but not bullet ogive design. The shape of the ogive can significantly affect how far the bullet jumps before contacting the rifling. Some 5.56 mm bullets have an ogive suitable for 5.56 chambers with the longer throat, but if they were cham*bered in a .223 Rem., it could result in very little, if any, "jump" to the rifling. This can increase pressures. Remember, the 5.56x45 mm already starts out at a higher pressure. If the higher-pressure 5.56x45 mm cartridge is then loaded into a .223 Rem. firearm with a short throat, the combination of the two factors can raise chamber pressures.

If you are a handloader, you must also consider that the 5.56x45 mm cartridge case may have a thicker sidewall and a thicker head, which were designed to withstand the stresses generated by the higher chamber pressures. This reduces the powder capacity of the case. If the 5.56x45 nun case is reloaded with powder charges that have proven safe in .223 Rem. cases, this reduced internal capacity can result in much higher chamber pressures.

Bottom line? It is safe to fire .223 Rem. cartridges in any safe gun chambered for 5.56x45mm. But, it is not recommended and it is not safe to fire 5.56x45 nun cartridges in a firearm chambered for .223 Rem.

In fact, the 5.56x45 mm military cartridge fired in a .223 Rem. chamber is considered by SAAMI to be an unsafe ammunition combi*nation and is listed in the "Unsafe
Arms and Ammunition Combinations" section of the SAAMI Technical Correspondent's Handbook. It states: "In firearms chambered for .223 Rem. - do not use 5.56x45 mm Military cartridges."

There is no guarantee, however, that .223 Rem. ammunition will work in 5.56x45 mm rifles. Semi*automatic rifles chambered for 5.56x45 mm may not function with .223 Rem. ammunition because they are designed to cycle reliably with the higher pressure and heavier bullets of the 5.56x45 mm particularly with short barrels. While problems are rare, they do not indicate that the ammunition or rifle are defective. Like some marriages, they are simply incompatible.

When shooting .223 Rem. cartridges in a firearm chambered for 5.56x45 mm, it's likely that there will be a degradation in accuracy and muzzle velocity due to the more generous chamber dimensions. That's not to say that a firearm chambered in 5.56x45 mm won't be accurate with .223 Rem. loads, only that, on average, the .223 Rem. chambered firearms will be more accurate with .223 Rem. ammunition than rifles chambered for 5.56x45 mm firing .223 Rem.

Another issue is the twist rate of the rifling. The SAAMI specification for .223 Rem. is a 1:12" twist, and most non-AR-15-type rifles will use that rate. But, this is a cartridge that crosses a wide spectrum of uses, and as a result there is often a wide deviation from the 1:12" twist rate, particularly in the very popular AR-15-style "black guns." There are bullets available for the .223 Rem. that range in weight at least from 35 grs. to 90 grs. With that wide of a spectrum, one twist rate is not going to be enough.

Firearms chambered for 5.56x45 mm often have a rifling twist rate of 1:7" to stabilize the long, sleek, heavy bullets used in long-range shooting. Any rifle with a 1:7" twist rate will work best with bullets heavier than 60 grs.

On the other hand, a 1: 12 twist rate (most bolt-action .223 rifles) will stabilize most bullets up to 60 grs., however some longer 60-gr. bullets will not shoot well with that twist rate. Many firearms use a 1:9" twist, which is a very good compromise that works well with most bullets up to 70 or 75 grs. The great thing is that if you have a good barrel and quality bullets, the 1:9 works well with even the lightest bullets.
What does all this mean? If you have anAR-15 type firearm with a 5.56x45 mm chamber you can shoot either .223 Rem. or 5.56x45 mm safely. If your twist rate is 1:7" you should use bullets weighing 60 grs. or heavier. If you have any rifle with a 1:12 twist you should shoot bullets of 60 grs. or less for best accuracy. If you have a .223 Rem. rifle of any type, it is not recommended that you use 5.56x45 mm ammunition.
Onmilo
 
Posts: 56912 | Location: GUNSHINE STATE | Registered: 05 October 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thank you Cool! I also seem to remember reading that mil-spec contracts also require that the brass must be annealed in the shoulde/neck area to be accepted. Maybe that is where I thought the brass is harder?


"The right to bear arms" insures your right to freedom, free speech, religion, your choice of doctors, etc. ....etc. ....etc....
-----------------------------------one trillion seconds = 31,709 years-------------------
 
Posts: 1521 | Location: Just about anywhere in Texas | Registered: 26 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Rae,

Using 4895 you will probably bulk out the case before getting into trouble with military brass, especially on a Dillon reloader or similar progressive reloader. (25.5 gr is so close to top of case neck that it may spill out a kernel or two).

I could get 3100 fps with 60 grain Nosler solid base boat tail using 4895 and commercial WW brass, but only about 2950 fps with new 55 grain ballistic tip and LC brass in 20 inch barrel.

I have had good luck w BLC-2 w 75 grain BTHP (2750 fps), RL-15 w 69 gr BTHP, and 4895 w 60 grain SP's (both Hornady and Nosler which will split a rock chuck in two at 150 yds).

RL-15 is more accurate at normal ranges than the BLC-2 w 75 grain but you get 50 fps more vbelocity w the Ball C.

Almost anything works w the 55 grain FMJ. H335 and BLC-2 my choices.

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Modern Military Rifles    Reloading for 5.56 on an AR platform questions?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia