THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MODERN MILITARY RIFLES FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What about the SKS?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
When I bought my SKSs I paid no attention to matching serial numbers. I figured they were all armory reworks being dumped on the market. Here lately I was told that matching numbered SKSs were worth a small fortune. I looked at mine and they are all matching numbers. If this is really the case, what can I expect to sell them for?


We Band of Bubbas
N.R.A Life Member
TDR Cummins Power All The Way
Certified member of the Whompers Club
 
Posts: 2973 | Location: South Texas | Registered: 15 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Drew: I don't think matching numbers make a big difference in SKS values unless you have one of the rarer variants in pristine, as-issued condition.


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16700 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Bill,

I know very little about the SKS rifles. Which variations are rare?


We Band of Bubbas
N.R.A Life Member
TDR Cummins Power All The Way
Certified member of the Whompers Club
 
Posts: 2973 | Location: South Texas | Registered: 15 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Sam
posted Hide Post
Off the top of my head Russian models as opposed to Chinese. I don't know if the bayonet was serialized or not, bu tmost of the SKS's I run across are Chinese and still marked at $400.


A bad day at the range is better than a good day at work.
 
Posts: 1254 | Location: Norfolk, Va | Registered: 27 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I bought mine for $69.99 each for the Chinese. I paid $125ea for the Russians.


We Band of Bubbas
N.R.A Life Member
TDR Cummins Power All The Way
Certified member of the Whompers Club
 
Posts: 2973 | Location: South Texas | Registered: 15 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ChetNC
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by drewhenrytnt:
I bought mine for $69.99 each for the Chinese. I paid $125ea for the Russians.


In the southern US and in EXC condition, you could quadruple what you paid for those rifles if you found someone willing to pay top dollar. Matching serials will not bring much of a premium that I am aware of. That may change in years to come.

Doubtful prices will ever come down on them again as those two are gone from the wholesale surplus market. You can still find Yugo and some other Eastern Bloc examples coming in but their prices are ballpark for what you have.
 
Posts: 348 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: 03 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Sam
posted Hide Post
2 Chinese, 99.99 and 109.99, mid 90's. Both are in synthetic stocks now. The wood's in the closet.


A bad day at the range is better than a good day at work.
 
Posts: 1254 | Location: Norfolk, Va | Registered: 27 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Joe from So. Cal.
posted Hide Post
I bought a Chinese one in Bonners Ferry ID 1992 for $110. Matching ##'s completely covered in cosmoline.

Good little knock-around gun but not real accurate.
 
Posts: 7725 | Location: Peoples Republic Of California | Registered: 13 October 2009Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
An SKS over an AK? Since I'm also a newcomer to this aspect of riflery, I'm curious...why?
 
Posts: 23 | Registered: 20 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Eric
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sam:
Off the top of my head Russian models as opposed to Chinese. I don't know if the bayonet was serialized or not, bu tmost of the SKS's I run across are Chinese and still marked at $400.


The rarest are the East German, very small number available, followed by the Albanian, Romanian, Russian, Yugoslavian, then Chinese. All are pretty much in order as per availability, and the quality is really not that much different. The exception is the Chinese who imported many SKS's with stampted metal trigger housings. All the rest use billit machined trigger housings to the best of my knowledge.

Eric


"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
Benjamin Franklin, July 4 1776
Lost once in the shuffle, member since 2000.
 
Posts: 199 | Location: Northwest Oregon | Registered: 05 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'll have disagree with the quality ratings. Although I've never handled an East German SKS I hear that their quality is quite good. I think the Yugo's are the most robust and excellent quality of the main SKS's out there. I feel they are better quality then the Russians. Being the Romanian AK's are recognized as the el cheapo's of AK's I can't see how their SKS's could rank high. The Yugo's are quite accurate too.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would believe that the mythical East German SKS would have been the highest quality of all the SKS's ...... BUT has anybody here ever seen one or fired one? Were they ever imported into the US? (I don't think so).

I've had two Chinese SKS's. The one I kept was one of the very earliest threaded barrel models which were actually made for Chinese military issue. Mine is a Jianshe Factory 296 (Triangle 26).

I can get 2 - 2 1/2" groups with iron sights and good ammo at 100 yds.

The other (also Chinese) was a pinned barreled Norinco. These were made for the export market exclusively. It was a 6-7" proposition at 100 yds. no matter what ammo I used. I got rid of it pronto!
 
Posts: 49226 | Registered: 21 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Don,

I've seen quality pictures of the East German SKS and they appeared very well made. I wonder what happen to them. Even when the CZ pistols were very hard to get, they did show up. It is funny the East German SKS's don't. I've heard there weren't very many of them made and that many of them were destroyed. Some showed up in use in Vietnam and were brought home as war trophies. A rare bird indeed.





 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tenmikemike
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TAO:
An SKS over an AK? Since I'm also a newcomer to this aspect of riflery, I'm curious...why?


Oh, longer barrel means somewhat better ballistics and longer sight radius for better accuracy. Right now I don't need 30 round mags (that could change in the future) so the tenner is sufficient. Plus it was a damn sight cheaper than an AK!


NRA Endowment Life member

CZ 550 American 9.3 X 62 Mauser/ Leupold VX-3 2.5-8 x 36
CZ 550 Safari Classic .458 Lott
 
Posts: 119 | Location: Phoenix AZ | Registered: 11 January 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would think the upper one would be the least desirable of all. Chinese with a built up stamped receiver and pinned barrel. Trigger guard stamped and welded as well



Grizz


Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal. John E Pfeiffer, The Emergence of Man

Those who can't skin, can hold a leg. Abraham Lincoln

Only one war at a time. Abe Again.
 
Posts: 4211 | Location: Alta. Canada | Registered: 06 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tenmikemike:
quote:
Originally posted by TAO:
An SKS over an AK? Since I'm also a newcomer to this aspect of riflery, I'm curious...why?


Oh, longer barrel means somewhat better ballistics and longer sight radius for better accuracy. Right now I don't need 30 round mags (that could change in the future) so the tenner is sufficient. Plus it was a damn sight cheaper than an AK!


Plus SKS use 10 round stripper clips so pretty fast to reload. Might not need that 30 round mag. AK's don't use a stripper clip system, strictly magazine fed.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In 1991 I was offered a brand new SKS and 1000 rounds of ammo for $150.00 Eastern European manufacture, dont recall exactly who built it. Still kicking myself in the butt over that one. Who would have known they would take off like they did.
 
Posts: 1016 | Location: Happy Valley, Utah | Registered: 13 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I am thinking of getting one of the Yugoslav SKS M59/66 model rifles with the grenade launcher attachment and the folding bayonet. Does anyone know if the grenade launcher and the bayonet can be easily removed? Also, does anyone have any knowledge (accuracy, reliability, etc.) about these Yugo rifles? Thanks in advance,
Bill.
 
Posts: 261 | Location: Williamsburg, VA | Registered: 27 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Thibeault:
I am thinking of getting one of the Yugoslav SKS M59/66 model rifles with the grenade launcher attachment and the folding bayonet. Does anyone know if the grenade launcher and the bayonet can be easily removed? Also, does anyone have any knowledge (accuracy, reliability, etc.) about these Yugo rifles? Thanks in advance,
Bill.


I have one of those and did remove all the junk. Don't let anyone tell you the grenade muzzle device is welded or silver soldered on, they are not. They are threaded and have a pin through them. After removing the pin they screw off but are VERY VERY TIGHT! I even applied a little heat to mine and they are right hand thread to turn counterclockwise to remove.

The rifle are robust and very accurate for an SKS. The one I have was unissued so everything was pretty minty. The Yugo's don't have a chrome chamber and bore because they had no chromium disposits and Russia wouldn't supply them as they had their own economic problems at the time. This is no big deal and if you do use any corrosive ammo it's an easy clean out.

I can highly recommend getting a Yugo SKS.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Agreed.

I bought a very clean 59/66 for $250 cash a couple weeks ago. Grenade launcher model. I like it better for cast bullet load work, because you can turn the gas off and work it like a T-bolt Browning 22.
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
On my Yugo SKS when you turn the gas off the button on the gas valve you do that with protruded up enough that it obscures my sight picture so I made a replacement with smaller button.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
the scope clears it with an inch to spare...
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
the scope clears it with an inch to spare...


When I first got the rifle I shot it with issue sights. After I scoped it the rest was history. Not everyone scopes them.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A must have for the SKS owner.

The SKS Carbine by Steve Kehava & Joe Poyer


____________________________________________

"If a man can't trust himself to carry a loaded rifle out of camp without risk of shooting somebody, then he has no business ever handling a rifle at all and should take up golf or tennis instead." John Taylor

Ruger Alaskan 416
Ruger African 223
 
Posts: 336 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 29 March 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hizzie:
A must have for the SKS owner.

The SKS Carbine by Steve Kehava & Joe Poyer


Hizzie, I agree! I need to get the new 4th Ed. I've got the original 1st Ed. (1996 green cover) and it doesn't cover the Yugo and Romanian versions very well. This could be because they hadn't started importing these to the US in numbers back then.

Does anybody here have a red dot mounted on their SKS? I think this would be a slick set-up provided it is mounted forward (to allow use of the standard strippers) and can be returned to original military configuration (ie. no tapping of receiver). I'm thinking a mount utilizing the rear sight housing would be the way to go.
 
Posts: 49226 | Registered: 21 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Sam
posted Hide Post
If you can find a decent after market receiver cover mount you can put a red dot behind the stripper groove. I have one that mounts fairly secure the other one flops around all over. I think I've seen a weaver rail mount that replaces the rear sight also.


A bad day at the range is better than a good day at work.
 
Posts: 1254 | Location: Norfolk, Va | Registered: 27 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TAO:
An SKS over an AK? Since I'm also a newcomer to this aspect of riflery, I'm curious...why?


I actually like the ergonomics of my SKS (Russian) way better than my AK (Romanian). It just feels better in my hands. The only thing I use either one of them for is plinking, so it's not like I'm handicapped by the ten round magazine of the SKS vs the 30 rounders for the AK.
 
Posts: 641 | Location: SW Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: 10 October 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My Russian SKS shoots better then my Romanian AK,and I've NEVER had any kind if issue witht he SKS functioning properly. My Romanian AK will choke and puke is it's not fed Bulgarian magazines.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Is a chinese sks with a milled receiver and threaded barrel rare? I have one, but it does not have the origanal stock... thx
 
Posts: 97 | Location: Arizona | Registered: 06 February 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of TEANCUM
posted Hide Post
I have a couple of these rascals with threaded barrels. One was $89 when they first came out and then the other was $169 a few years later.

The older will actually group at 3.0-3.5" at 100 yds which I think is great, while the newer one is around 5-6" at 100 yards.

Fun guns to shoot but not accurate.
 
Posts: 1788 | Location: IDAHO | Registered: 12 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
milled receiver


Most of the milled receivers are Russian.

If it's chinese AND has a milled receiver, it must be a pretty early chinese model.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
posted 29 December 2017 07:04

I recently acquired a Chinese made SKS and trying to decipher the exact place it was produced. The gun is marked with a triangle with numbers 906 inside it after that it has serial number 1720115 says Made in China by Norinco CSI ONT CA. I have an excellent book that is for collectors with tons of info. From this book my best guess is the gun was made in 1957 and in #720115, but 20115 is the only number stamped on everything else. Also I find nothing about factory 906, I found 96, but not 906. Anyone have a better handle on this for me? I have the book mentioned and it is greatI also just rad that in pursuant as of 1990 it is illegal to install a bayonet on the Chinese version SKS. WTF? All the others made somewhere else it is ok. According to the law if installed it make the Chinese SKS an "assault rifle". Oh Duh! Anyone got a handle on this too..


NRA Life Member
 
Posts: 69 | Location: caseyville, IL | Registered: 11 January 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
SKSs?

Meh, blah, ... I don't know. I owned a few back in the day, then got rid of them. While I wouldn't call them "junk," they were hardly accurate with the 7.62x39 Commie fodder I shot thru them. Good riddance.

Kept my most awesome M1As and Garands though ...


All The Best ...
 
Posts: 813 | Location: Texas | Registered: 15 October 2015Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia