THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MODERN MILITARY RIFLES FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
WHO BUILDS DPMS ACTIONS
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Does Stag Arms manufacture DPMS lowers?


Thanks,
Roger
 
Posts: 1409 | Location: S. E. ARIZONA | Registered: 05 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Post #1





Group Icon

Group: Members
Member No.: 1,128
Posts: 70
Joined: Aug. 18th 2006
Online Status: OFFLINE








Lewis Machine & Tool

LMT
Lauer
DS Arms
PWA
Eagle
Armalite
Knights Armament
Barrett

Continental Machine Tool

Stag
Rock River Arms
High Standard
Noveske
Century (New)
Global Tactical
CLE
S&W
MGI
Wilson Tactical
Grenadier Precision
Colt

LAR Manufacturing

LAR
Bushmaster
Ameetec
DPMS
CMMG
Double Star
Fulton Armory
Spike's Tactical

JVP

Double Star
LRB
Charles Daly

Mega Machine Shop

Mega
GSE
Dalphon
POF
Alexander Arms

Olympic

Olympic
SGW
Tromix
Palmetto
Dalphon
Frankford
Century (Old)

Sun Devil

Sun Devil forged billet receivers

Superior

Superior Arms
Lauer (New)


Aero Precision

Aero Precision
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
SmokingJ,

You show two different manufactures for Stag and DPMS.

I bought a couple of left-handed Stags and finally bought a right-handed DPMS.

They both look exactly alike other than being right and left handed.

Kind of strange both companies put out exact copies of AR-15's.

Roger QSL
 
Posts: 1409 | Location: S. E. ARIZONA | Registered: 05 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by QSL:
SmokingJ,

You show two different manufactures for Stag and DPMS.

I bought a couple of left-handed Stags and finally bought a right-handed DPMS.

They both look exactly alike other than being right and left handed.

Kind of strange both companies put out exact copies of AR-15's.

Roger QSL


Am I missing something? I only see one manufacturer for Stag and DPMS. I'm not certain that the same manufacturer makes both DPMS's AR15 and AR10 receivers. AR 15 receivers are made to a certain specification and often a certain finishing coating so why wouldn't some look identical? On top of that the specifications may be military specs give or take what full auto machining is left out of civilian receivers (that is so you can't put full auto parts in them without drastic machining and drill of the necessary holes.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
From reading your post, it looks as though CMT is making Stag and LAR is making DPMS.

That's what I meant by two manufactures.

As to the rifles them selves, duplicates.

Not military specs, just plain copies.

My next question is, do all the manufactures of AR-15's use the same CNC programs?

They must be, as if you lay the Stag next to the DPMS, they appear to be exactly the same.

Roger
 
Posts: 1409 | Location: S. E. ARIZONA | Registered: 05 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There are more then a few AR's that are made to military specs. CMT is the parent company of Stag or in other words Stag is CMT's retail outlet. CMT has made Colts from the very beginning. They are one of the oldest AR manufacturers. I believe another that is to military specs is Bushmaster. By the way Colt makes a police model of the AR 15 that is supposed to be 100 percent military specs.

I'm sure there is some specification program as all the parts have to be interchangeable.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by QSL:
From reading your post, it looks as though CMT is making Stag and LAR is making DPMS.

That's what I meant by two manufactures.

As to the rifles them selves, duplicates.

Not military specs, just plain copies.

My next question is, do all the manufactures of AR-15's use the same CNC programs?

They must be, as if you lay the Stag next to the DPMS, they appear to be exactly the same.

Roger


I think you'll find this with 90% of AR-15 uppers and lowers. With a set of calipers you're likely to find some minor dimensional differences in non-critical areas, here and there, but to the naked eye, there's not much in it [large pin Colts excepeted]. Internals may vary a little more, but again, most AR-15s are like Lego sets, which is their main attraction. Of course, billet uppers and lowers are a different kettle 'o fish.

Albatross.
 
Posts: 2497 | Location: Pacific Northwest | Registered: 21 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SmokinJ:
There are more then a few AR's that are made to military specs. CMT is the parent company of Stag or in other words Stag is CMT's retail outlet. CMT has made Colts from the very beginning. They are one of the oldest AR manufacturers. I believe another that is to military specs is Bushmaster. By the way Colt makes a police model of the AR 15 that is supposed to be 100 percent military specs.

I'm sure there is some specification program as all the parts have to be interchangeable.


CMT/Stag and Bushmaster do not make mil spec firearms.
 
Posts: 956 | Location: PNW | Registered: 27 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Sam
posted Hide Post
Mil Spec refers to acceptable for military use. It's not a magic rating. The AR-15 and M1911 are both copied by various makers. Not all copies are submitted for military contract but most are interchangeable unless the are made for a purpose, like the LMT rail and upper.

Does LAR make the Remington receivers also? DPMS/Bushmaster/Remington are Freedom Arms.


A bad day at the range is better than a good day at work.
 
Posts: 1254 | Location: Norfolk, Va | Registered: 27 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RyanB:
quote:
Originally posted by SmokinJ:
There are more then a few AR's that are made to military specs. CMT is the parent company of Stag or in other words Stag is CMT's retail outlet. CMT has made Colts from the very beginning. They are one of the oldest AR manufacturers. I believe another that is to military specs is Bushmaster. By the way Colt makes a police model of the AR 15 that is supposed to be 100 percent military specs.

I'm sure there is some specification program as all the parts have to be interchangeable.


CMT/Stag and Bushmaster do not make mil spec firearms.


Stag is the commercial outlet of CMT who is Continental Machine & Tool. They have made the Colts from day one. They are one of the oldest AR15/M16 manufacturers. Colt has mil spec rifle so that means CMT made them. Bushmaster has at a time supplied M16's to the military. I would say they were mil spec, wouldn't you? If you don't believe CMT does mil spec look at their home page:

http://www.continentalmachinetool.com/
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sam:
Mil Spec refers to acceptable for military use. It's not a magic rating. The AR-15 and M1911 are both copied by various makers. Not all copies are submitted for military contract but most are interchangeable unless the are made for a purpose, like the LMT rail and upper.

Does LAR make the Remington receivers also? DPMS/Bushmaster/Remington are Freedom Arms.


Remington just sells them, they don't make them. DPMS and Bushmaster were bought and incorporated into the Freedom Arms cicle so that they would have AR15's and AR10's. If LAR was making them before they are more then likely still making receivers for them.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sam:
Mil Spec refers to acceptable for military use. It's not a magic rating. The AR-15 and M1911 are both copied by various makers. Not all copies are submitted for military contract but most are interchangeable unless the are made for a purpose, like the LMT rail and upper.

Does LAR make the Remington receivers also? DPMS/Bushmaster/Remington are Freedom Arms.


Their products don't meet the specification and would not pass inspection for acceptance.
 
Posts: 956 | Location: PNW | Registered: 27 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SmokinJ:
quote:
Originally posted by RyanB:
quote:
Originally posted by SmokinJ:
There are more then a few AR's that are made to military specs. CMT is the parent company of Stag or in other words Stag is CMT's retail outlet. CMT has made Colts from the very beginning. They are one of the oldest AR manufacturers. I believe another that is to military specs is Bushmaster. By the way Colt makes a police model of the AR 15 that is supposed to be 100 percent military specs.

I'm sure there is some specification program as all the parts have to be interchangeable.


CMT/Stag and Bushmaster do not make mil spec firearms.


Stag is the commercial outlet of CMT who is Continental Machine & Tool. They have made the Colts from day one. They are one of the oldest AR15/M16 manufacturers. Colt has mil spec rifle so that means CMT made them. Bushmaster has at a time supplied M16's to the military. I would say they were mil spec, wouldn't you? If you don't believe CMT does mil spec look at their home page:

http://www.continentalmachinetool.com/


While several companies have produced parts for Colt they do not maintain a copy of the schematics, are forbidden by contract from using Colt supplied data in sales to entities other than Colt, and even then Colt makes most of the parts in house. Furthermore several manufacturers produce multiple grades of product for sales to other manufacturers, so knowing the name of the subcontractor isn't the greatest way of knowing the specification of the product. Furthermore, Bushmaster produced fewer than 200 weapons for the military in the early 1990s, before the M4 was type classified. They do not have access to the technical data package for the M4 Carbine and consistently use sub standard parts. I know of one federal agency that bought Bushmasters instead of Colts one year to save money and shit canned them within months for failures.

There are companies that compare well with Colt. BCM, LMT, etc.
 
Posts: 956 | Location: PNW | Registered: 27 April 2009Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I've got a follow up question for SmokinJ or anyone else. Who makes the barrels, upper receivers for JSE Surplus and Model "1" Sales? bewildered Thank you in advance for sharing your knowledge. Smiler

Dan


Take your children hunting and you won't be hunting for your children.
 
Posts: 3 | Location: Kansas--Land of the Jayhawks! | Registered: 27 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
From the low price JSE sales their complete uppers and barrels I wouldn't expect top of the line parts. Barrels start at around $95 so what do you think you are actually going to get for that price? I don't know who makes their products, but Model 1 says on their website for some of the barrels that they are E.R. Shaw.

I bought a barrel from DPMS for a 7.62x39 and it was made by Wilson Barrels, not the Wilson that makes custom 1911's.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RyanB:
quote:
Originally posted by SmokinJ:
quote:
Originally posted by RyanB:
quote:
Originally posted by SmokinJ:
There are more then a few AR's that are made to military specs. CMT is the parent company of Stag or in other words Stag is CMT's retail outlet. CMT has made Colts from the very beginning. They are one of the oldest AR manufacturers. I believe another that is to military specs is Bushmaster. By the way Colt makes a police model of the AR 15 that is supposed to be 100 percent military specs.

I'm sure there is some specification program as all the parts have to be interchangeable.


CMT/Stag and Bushmaster do not make mil spec firearms.


Stag is the commercial outlet of CMT who is Continental Machine & Tool. They have made the Colts from day one. They are one of the oldest AR15/M16 manufacturers. Colt has mil spec rifle so that means CMT made them. Bushmaster has at a time supplied M16's to the military. I would say they were mil spec, wouldn't you? If you don't believe CMT does mil spec look at their home page:

http://www.continentalmachinetool.com/


While several companies have produced parts for Colt they do not maintain a copy of the schematics, are forbidden by contract from using Colt supplied data in sales to entities other than Colt, and even then Colt makes most of the parts in house. Furthermore several manufacturers produce multiple grades of product for sales to other manufacturers, so knowing the name of the subcontractor isn't the greatest way of knowing the specification of the product. Furthermore, Bushmaster produced fewer than 200 weapons for the military in the early 1990s, before the M4 was type classified. They do not have access to the technical data package for the M4 Carbine and consistently use sub standard parts. I know of one federal agency that bought Bushmasters instead of Colts one year to save money and shit canned them within months for failures.

There are companies that compare well with Colt. BCM, LMT, etc.


Think about what you said there. If some companies makes parts for Colt you better damn well believe they DO have the blue prints to make them by. I don't know where you got that information, but it is incorrect.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
As I understand it, the prints are sent back to Colt at the completion of the contract. They wouldn't have a full set anyway, just a specification and set of sheets for the product they were building. In any case, Colt currently subcontracts relatively few parts.

Also, when Bushmaster made weapons for the government the TDP for the M4 wasn't complete and the weapon hadn't been accepted for use. They only made a few hundred anyway, and I've never met anyone who has seen them.
 
Posts: 956 | Location: PNW | Registered: 27 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RyanB:
As I understand it, the prints are sent back to Colt at the completion of the contract. They wouldn't have a full set anyway, just a specification and set of sheets for the product they were building. In any case, Colt currently subcontracts relatively few parts.

Also, when Bushmaster made weapons for the government the TDP for the M4 wasn't complete and the weapon hadn't been accepted for use. They only made a few hundred anyway, and I've never met anyone who has seen them.


Colt and the Army made an agreement that they can share the TDP with whoever to fill their needs to supply the necessary amount of firearms to Army. I believe the time period on the M16 has expired so the it doesn't go back to Colt. The M4 is probably close to that time limit. At any rate that information is available to just about anyone. As to whether that is legal or not I cannot answer. I know FN makes M16's, not sure if they do any M4's, but doesn't Daniel Defense make some M4's?
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm pretty sure if you crossed a Stag with a Colt you'd get an antlered mule.
 
Posts: 3808 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SmokinJ:
quote:
Originally posted by RyanB:
As I understand it, the prints are sent back to Colt at the completion of the contract. They wouldn't have a full set anyway, just a specification and set of sheets for the product they were building. In any case, Colt currently subcontracts relatively few parts.

Also, when Bushmaster made weapons for the government the TDP for the M4 wasn't complete and the weapon hadn't been accepted for use. They only made a few hundred anyway, and I've never met anyone who has seen them.


Colt and the Army made an agreement that they can share the TDP with whoever to fill their needs to supply the necessary amount of firearms to Army. I believe the time period on the M16 has expired so the it doesn't go back to Colt. The M4 is probably close to that time limit. At any rate that information is available to just about anyone. As to whether that is legal or not I cannot answer. I know FN makes M16's, not sure if they do any M4's, but doesn't Daniel Defense make some M4's?


At this point the TDP for both IIRC has reverted to the Army but others will have to pay a licensing fee to use it. In any case once a contract is completed the drawings are returned to the owner. Of course the data floats out, so it's not a complete secret. No one but Colt has made M4s for the Army, though others have provided uppers or parts. DD makes uppers for MK18 and M4A1 Block II rifles.
 
Posts: 956 | Location: PNW | Registered: 27 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ryan,

I guess you've never seen an M4 carbine with the FN logo on it???
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
Remember that Mil-Spec is the minimum acceptable quality. Many manufacturers make their products to better than Mil-Spec quality.


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12548 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fjold:
Remember that Mil-Spec is the minimum acceptable quality. Many manufacturers make their products to better than Mil-Spec quality.


That's true and many make theirs below mil spec.
 
Posts: 2459 | Registered: 02 July 2010Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia