One of Us
| You should not be able to push the bolt stop fore and aft, any. So you have an issue. Post a picture and I will tell you. |
| |
One of Us
| That's what I was thinking. I don't have a picture of it, but I know it's not right. Got a inquiry into the manufacturer about it, going to see what they say.
Auburn University BS '09, DVM '17
|
| Posts: 607 | Location: Selma, AL | Registered: 16 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Contacted the company and they are sending me a "modified" bolt catch that fixes the problem. Can't wait to see what this entails.
Auburn University BS '09, DVM '17
|
| Posts: 607 | Location: Selma, AL | Registered: 16 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Is this a AR-15 or SR-25/308LR rifle? Are you using GI/Aluminum magazines or Tupperware magazines? Shim the affected receivers bolt stop forward w/o binding & check operation. |
| Posts: 430 | Location: Fairbanks,AK. | Registered: 30 October 2008 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| AR15. It is an issue with with USGI and magpuls. I thought of shimming the back to push it forward but I am not sure even then if would engage enough for reliable operation. Going to see what this fix is before I start engineering. It's not a huge deal as this is strictly a fun gun but it would be nice for it to work as intended.
Auburn University BS '09, DVM '17
|
| Posts: 607 | Location: Selma, AL | Registered: 16 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Any fore and aft movement indicates a fault with either the bolt stop or the receiver. There should be no movement in mil spec items. |
| |
One of Us
| Pretty much what happened here is this guy ordered a bunch of receivers back before the election. The receivers we got were among the first he sold. My gun was affected, and my uncles gun ended up being affected. The lowers are simply out of spec. The fix was a standard bolt catch that appeared to have the nose lengthened with I assume JB weld or other epoxy. I ain't happy about it, but the guy is pretty much out of business so I happy I even got this part. Live and learn. The gun however functions flawlessly now.
Auburn University BS '09, DVM '17
|
| Posts: 607 | Location: Selma, AL | Registered: 16 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by model7LSS: Pretty much what happened here is this guy ordered a bunch of receivers back before the election. The receivers we got were among the first he sold. My gun was affected, and my uncles gun ended up being affected. The lowers are simply out of spec. The fix was a standard bolt catch that appeared to have the nose lengthened with I assume JB weld or other epoxy. I ain't happy about it, but the guy is pretty much out of business so I happy I even got this part. Live and learn. The gun however functions flawlessly now.
I ran into a similar issue on a cheap lower I had purchased. Ended up the bore for the bolt catch spring & plunger was out of spec. allowing the plunger to bottom in the bore, not allowing the catch to come up high enough. I drilled the spring & plunger bore .015 deeper & all 4 catches I had tried before work fine now. I just looked at 6 different brand lowers ALL have .010-.015 fore to aft slop in the bolt catch. I'll bet you have the same issue I did? Have a good one!! |
| Posts: 2362 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| What appeared to have happened, was either the bolt catch slot was milled too far backwards, or the mag cut too far forward. I bought a stripped upper from the guy to build a kindsa budget SPR with it. Full A2 stock, Palmetto State EPT trigger with JP springs, 18" Criterion HBAR in 223 Wylde with rifle length gas, cheapish 15" rail, and Miculek brake. It will print 5 rounds of budget 223 into 1". Gonna try to work some loads up but its a fun gun to shoot.
Auburn University BS '09, DVM '17
|
| Posts: 607 | Location: Selma, AL | Registered: 16 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Seems like it would be a easy fix by using a shim of proper thickness to take up the play on the back side. |
| |
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by p dog shooter: Seems like it would be an easy fix by using a shim of proper thickness to take up the play on the back side.
I thought about that. However, I learned the problem really wasn't the dimension of the cut, but the cut in relation to the magazine well. It's true it was sloppier than my other guns, but I am not sure a shim would have brought it far enough up. Be interesting to know who manufactured the lowers to see if any other "brand" was affected.
Auburn University BS '09, DVM '17
|
| Posts: 607 | Location: Selma, AL | Registered: 16 January 2005 |
IP
|
|