The Accurate Reloading Forums
Rebore & rechamber 375 to 400?

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9411043/m/8391033761

29 November 2011, 06:24
Grenadier
Rebore & rechamber 375 to 400?
The recent posts about Whitworth Express rifles have got me pondering. Assuming there is enough "meat" in the Whitworth 375H&H barrel to rebore to .411", would it be feasible to rechamber one to 400H&H? I just played with a couple of dummy 400H&H rounds in a 375H&H Whitworth. The 400 has a lot of taper and a long neck. Magazine feeding and loading shouldn't be much of an issue. I imagine the barrel would need to be set back but by how much? Any thoughts on feasibility?




.
29 November 2011, 06:30
ramrod340
I thought the 458 and 375 MKX were the same taper. However ammoquide raises several issue with case shape.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
29 November 2011, 07:17
viperidae
I have a Zastava and though about the same thing but decided against it. All factory Whitworth, Interarms Mark X, Charles Daly, Remington 798, Z98s in .375 H&H are opened up almost entirely to the front. I wasn't comfortable with this above the .375. I am not trying to start a flame. They have been made this way for years and all functioned and worn fine. I just didn't like the idea of stepping it up in these actions. If I was able to start with say a 7mm action and have a gunsmith open it up a little in both directions I would not have this reservations.
29 November 2011, 09:13
ramrod340
While I've had concerns with taking a MKX to something hotter than a 375 a 400H&H wouldn't raise that much of a concern with me.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
29 November 2011, 18:45
bobc
I've thought about the same thing. Watch though if your 375 whitworth has a recoil lug on the barrel. My gunsmith thought it was set fairly deep, safe as it was, but a 411 rebore would leave pretty little meat in the barrel for the new bore. Also looked to me like the long neck of the 400 H&H would not allow a straight re-bore to create the 400 chamber without a pretty significant setback. Bob
29 November 2011, 20:44
Grenadier
quote:
Originally posted by bobc:
I've thought about the same thing. Watch though if your 375 whitworth has a recoil lug on the barrel. My gunsmith thought it was set fairly deep, safe as it was, but a 411 rebore would leave pretty little meat in the barrel for the new bore. Also looked to me like the long neck of the 400 H&H would not allow a straight re-bore to create the 400 chamber without a pretty significant setback. Bob


I was thinking that a rebore would leave the sights in place and wouldn't require stock work. I would have something to try the cartridge out in before ordering a rifle made in that caliber.

Do you think one or two turns setback would do it?




.
29 November 2011, 21:05
tiggertate
Bolt thrust is the issue and the 400 and 375 are nominally the same. Both have an MAP of around 62-63k. There is no increased risk just by caliber change. I re-barrleled a 375 MK X to 416 Remington and shot it for years without issue. Another poster has it today and may still be banging away with it. Before that it was a 300 Wby and before that a 375 Ackley Improved, all on the same action. Never had any bolt thrust issues, even as a 300 Wby.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
30 November 2011, 21:48
ramrod340
As I was drinking my coffee this morning I drew up the 400 over the 375H&H because of the 400 shoulder position it will not clean up the shoulder of the 375. You are lookiing at .316"+ setback.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
01 December 2011, 00:25
bobc
Thanks, that's what I thought. Awfully long neck on the 400.
01 December 2011, 01:00
Grenadier
quote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
You are lookiing at .316"+ setback.

Thanks. That kind of defeats the purpose of using the same barrel. I guess rebarreling would be the way to go. Maybe someone with a Mauser action will be interested in a nice .375H&H barrel with "Whitworth Rifle Company" and a castle printed on it.




.
01 December 2011, 02:24
ramrod340
The max difference between the two is .008" The 400 would chamber and fire you would just end up a with a bulge each time at the base of the neck.

Wish I had the room for the Whitworth. Frowner


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
01 December 2011, 04:32
Grenadier
quote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
... you would just end up a with a bulge each time at the base of the neck.


I don't like the idea of that.




.
01 December 2011, 05:30
ramrod340
quote:
I don't like the idea of that

I don't either. But I have seen it done (not the 400H&H) with no major issue with much larger gaps than this. As I draw the case drawings and measure the gap it is .008 at the max. Remember copy paper is .0038-.004". I wonder how much you would see or feel it.

My $ I wouldn't bore a factory MKX barrel. For the few $$ more (if any) I would simply get a new barrel.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
01 December 2011, 21:04
xausa
I believe if you send the barrel to Douglas they will duplicate the profile for you, saving you the trouble of re-inletting the stock. I have done that several times with pre-64 Model 70 barrels with no problem.