Thanks Saeed for posting this terrific topic. The guy is obviously a highly skilled photographer, and his work is absolutely phenomenal.

However having said that, the issue is that of the Hasselblad digital. I had a Hasselblad 500 CM with several lenses, which I traded in on a D1 X. The Real Benefit to the Hasselblad system where the big negatives and the wonderful Zeiss optics.

While a 2 1/4 slides made for magnificent sales presentations, I really see no benefit of the extremely high resolution images of the digital models unless you are making billboards or perhaps superhigh resolution digital presentations. There are no reasonably priced projectors that work in that mode. Similarly, I'm not aware of any reasonably priced printers that can handle a 50 meg image.

Used H3 and H4 are coming on to the use market. Most of them have a reasonable the low number of clicks.

However, I'm willing to listen if somebody has an answer for me to the questions posed above.

The issue is the D3/D4 Nikon range of cameras versus the Hasselblad digital. Anybody have any thoughts on the subject?

Blads never do take bad photos.