What r the pros and cons of these 2 lever guns in 30-30? i would like a scope maby 4x. but i would rather have a nice open sight than a sh*tty scoped 30-30.

Angle ejection: it eject out of the top of the rifle but at an angle as not to come in contact with the optics? is that right? or is angle ejection like marlin rifle is loads and ejects out of the side of the rifle?

You fellas that are breakin' bad on the 30-30 is plum full of hooey. Nothing wrong with bigger but it won't really kill 'em any deader.

My point isn't really with killing them deader it is more to the point of leaving a very healthy bloodtrail if the animal even gets out of sight before succumbing. The destruction of a heavy for caliber bullet travelling at moderate speed seems to drop animals of all sizes more quickly than light for caliber rockets. I thouroughly believe that Elmer Keith was on to the truth with his claims that larger diameter bullets do a better job of killing, of anchoring and of providing large holes for blood trails.
Accurate shooting is still required! Nothing more being needed to support that statement.
Trailing animals through rough country; country where the levergun really shines, is difficult enough but the very substantial damage caused by the larger calibers makes tracking that much easier even in rough country.
I have noticed that the Hawk, The Barnes Original and other large caliber round and flat nose bullets leave a substantial amount of damage even at the slower velocities offered by the leverguns.
Of couse it is all based on my limited experience and opinion. But I think Keith believed it too and that is really enough for me to continue following that path.
Frank

Why does everyone seem to think it is difficult to scope a modern Winchester?