21 February 2008, 09:19
DaManThe camo pattern on this ship would be very effective......... if it weren't belching smoke!

21 February 2008, 18:10
meteIt's properly called disruptive camouflage.It's meant not to hide a ship but to confuse you so you can't tell the size or type ship.
21 February 2008, 20:39
tin canquote:
It's properly called disruptive camouflage.It's meant not to hide a ship but to confuse you so you can't tell the size or type ship.
or the direction and speed it's traveling.
22 February 2008, 01:03
enfieldsparesYes. So that the AOB or "Angle on the Bow" cannot be correctly calculated by a submarine about to launch a torpedo attack.
There is another bizarre British wartime camouflage applied to vehicles in 1940 called "Mickey Mouse Ear"!
And some British fighters were, underneath, painted one side from totally black the other side totally white!
23 February 2008, 04:32
D HumbargerI have always found the "dazzle" concept very interesting.
23 February 2008, 07:23
RG RhodesReminds me of a zebra's stripes..
RG
23 February 2008, 07:39
ireload2When there is a fake horizon, turrets and two or 3 fake bow waves painted on the side of the hull it must have been pretty confusing for a submariner.
Put that ship in a convoy with several others behind it and it would be worse.