13 January 2012, 16:47
69deerStainless Rugers
I just bought an older Ruger Stainless Redhawk in 44 Mag. and a Stainless Super Redhawk in 44 Mag. Both have scopes. But which one should I get rid of and which to keep?
13 January 2012, 17:44
p dog shooterA lot epends on what one wants them for. Barrel lenght ect.
They are both fine guns.
I would keep both take the scope of the Regular redhawk for a carry gun and use the super as a hunting gun.
13 January 2012, 19:57
DoublessPurely aesthetics, in my mind... I don't like the way the frame extends on the SRH, but from what I have read they are incredibly accurate. I have all eight of the original stainless Redhawks (four calibers in both barrel lengths), and don't own a single SRH. But I have often been the "oddball"...
17 January 2012, 05:05
filmitI love them both. Keep both of them.
21 January 2012, 02:27
69deerI guess I will keep both. I was looking for some insite that maybe one was much better than the other. Thanks.
27 January 2012, 02:39
Boss HossI have shot both quite a bit and prefer the Redhawk.
21 September 2017, 12:22
Cold Trigger Fingerquote:
Originally posted by p dog shooter:
A lot epends on what one wants them for. Barrel lenght ect.
They are both fine guns.
I would keep both take the scope of the Regular redhawk for a carry gun and use the super as a hunting gun.
Same here !!
21 September 2017, 14:52
p dog shooterquote:
Same here !!
One can tell it is getting to be cold in AK.
Bringing life to a 5 year old thread.
My answer is the same as it was 5 years ago.
21 September 2017, 20:28
meteAre either made in SS Bisley ?