27 January 2015, 02:55
loiblbGlock 17 or Sig 226 ?
Looking for a pistol in 9mm.
The Glock 17 and the Sig 226 have high marks for best of this and that.
I would like to buy a 9mm pistol and not be sorry for a change. What could be any better in 9mm out there?
Thanks
27 January 2015, 03:33
PeterThere is, as I recollect, quite a difference in price between these two guns. I own a Glock 17 and 17L and love them both. The 226 was just too expensive for me.
peter
27 January 2015, 06:41
loiblbThat's what I have now a CZ75B now still looking
27 January 2015, 10:42
ShootshellzGlock. Spend the extra ca$h you save for ammunition.
28 January 2015, 16:54
p dog shooterI shot both my vote is clock really nothing wrong with the sig
31 January 2015, 21:49
LeopardtrackI carry a Glock but the best thing to do is to shoot both and see which one feels the best.
They are both great so see what you like best
31 January 2015, 22:35
butchloci'd go sig without question,but i have no time for plastic guns
01 February 2015, 02:21
jbokI have owned both of these pistols, can't say I have a clear cut favorite. They both are accurate, function perfect, and both feel good but considerably different. I am more partial to the Glock trigger (have a 3.5 lb. connector installed. Leopardtrack has the best advice, shoot both and see what features work best for you.
01 February 2015, 12:37
Leopardtrackquote:
Originally posted by jbok:
I have owned both of these pistols, can't say I have a clear cut favorite. They both are accurate, function perfect, and both feel good but considerably different. I am more partial to the Glock trigger (have a 3.5 lb. connector installed. Leopardtrack has the best advice, shoot both and see what features work best for you.
Good point and thanks for reminding me. I have the 3.5 trigger as well and I like the constant trigger over the Sigs Double/single action pull.
I also like the way the glock sits low in my hand, but again that's just me.