The Accurate Reloading Forums
Scope Mounts for a Heym 450NE
16 November 2010, 06:11
Texas Blue DevilScope Mounts for a Heym 450NE
I'd like to have some quick detach scope mounts for my Heym 450.
Does anyone have recommendations for this work?
Thanks!!!
Go Duke!!
16 November 2010, 06:22
450/400JJ at Champlin's...
16 November 2010, 16:21
dirklawyerquote:
Originally posted by 450/400:
JJ at Champlin's...
Ditto's, JJ would be my first choice
"An individual with experience is never at the mercies of an individual with an argument"
16 November 2010, 17:12
smarterthanuquote:
I'd like to have some quick detach scope mounts for my Heym 450.
Oh please no! That's like puting Amish clothes on a super model.
16 November 2010, 19:02
ddrhookthink of how much fun it would be taking the wrapping off the super model

18 November 2010, 04:34
GarByJJ is awesome....but I'd ask Chris (new_guy) before I did anything.
Gary
DRSS
NRA Lifer
SCI
DSC
18 November 2010, 06:35
dpcdI put Recknagel mounts on my Krieghoff and I am going to put them on my Sabatti. The Weaver base works fine, but it's, well, a Weaver base.
18 November 2010, 11:35
Monastery-ForesterOn a Heym, there must be a german claw-mount (Suhler Einhakmontage) - very eypensive, but ..
18 November 2010, 19:44
CCMDocquote:
Originally posted by Monastery-Forester:
On a Heym, there must be a german claw-mount (Suhler Einhakmontage) - very eypensive, but ..
Why not a German swing mount i.e. Recknagel?
NRA Lifer; DSC Lifer; SCI member; DRSS; AR member since November 9 2003
Don't Save the best for last, the smile for later or the "Thanks" for tomorow
18 November 2010, 21:14
DMquote:
Originally posted by Monastery-Forester:
On a Heym, there must be a german claw-mount (Suhler Einhakmontage) - very eypensive, but ..
This by far would be my first choise. I like it much better than a swing mount!
DM
18 November 2010, 23:54
Monastery-Foresterquote:
Originally posted by CCMDoc:
quote:
Originally posted by Monastery-Forester:
On a Heym, there must be a german claw-mount (Suhler Einhakmontage) - very eypensive, but ..
Why not a German swing mount i.e. Recknagel?
Because it is more beautifull (and much more expensive)
19 November 2010, 02:44
CCMDocquote:
Originally posted by Monastery-Forester:
quote:
Originally posted by CCMDoc:
quote:
Originally posted by Monastery-Forester:
On a Heym, there must be a german claw-mount (Suhler Einhakmontage) - very eypensive, but ..
Why not a German swing mount i.e. Recknagel?
Because it is more beautifull (and much more expensive)
True (and very true)
NRA Lifer; DSC Lifer; SCI member; DRSS; AR member since November 9 2003
Don't Save the best for last, the smile for later or the "Thanks" for tomorow
19 November 2010, 02:50
BiebsDoc, He could always sell the rifle to buy the mounts. Hey....wait a minute....!
19 November 2010, 03:07
CCMDocquote:
Originally posted by Biebs:
Doc, He could always sell the rifle to buy the mounts. Hey....wait a minute....!
Well,
The mounts
are beautiful and that just might be worth doing ...

NRA Lifer; DSC Lifer; SCI member; DRSS; AR member since November 9 2003
Don't Save the best for last, the smile for later or the "Thanks" for tomorow
19 November 2010, 20:16
AkshooterBack when I had some money I did'nt have a problem coughing up the $ for claw mounts and yes the are beautifull, but I'm not so sure I think any nicer than "well done" swingmounts.
Here's a couple of mine, let me know if you think the claws really do look better?
DRSS
NRA life
AK Master Guide 124
19 November 2010, 23:32
Monastery-ForesterI´m sure, that a swing mount is stronger than a claw-mount, but..
look at egun.de "Doppelbüchsen", you can find a nice Heym 80 in 9,3x74R with claw-mount and a Zeiss 2,5-10x50 for 5000€ !
19 November 2010, 23:51
eagle27quote:
Originally posted by dpcd:
I put Recknagel mounts on my Krieghoff and I am going to put them on my Sabatti. The Weaver base works fine, but it's, well, a Weaver base.
Not another one
The key words "works fine"!!!!!! Do we hunt or just sit in the arm chair and look?

20 November 2010, 03:00
DMPut claw mts on my DR please, as i like them WAAAAAY better than the swings.
At 6 to $700. for claws,
They certainly aren't "un-affordable"...
DM
20 November 2010, 07:41
dpcdOf course Weaver bases work with no functional drawbacks. And it was free. But, they don't belong on a double rifle because of the looks. Recknagel mounts cost about $400. I will get there soon.
20 November 2010, 13:58
eagle27quote:
Originally posted by dpcd:
Of course Weaver bases work with no functional drawbacks. And it was free. But, they don't belong on a double rifle because of the looks. Recknagel mounts cost about $400. I will get there soon.
Yes I was being a bit tongue in check defending the weavers so strongly, its just I get a bit septic when I see scopes mounted on doubles, and bolts, in fancy mounts looking like the carry handle on an AR15.
The most promoted aspect of dangerous game rifles is their balance and pointability, no more so than the double which is supposedly king of the field. All without exception that have this pointability factor, have low mounted iron sights along the top of the barrel or between the barrels on a low rib.
Obviously it is an impossiblity to get a scope mounted so low but at least we should be aiming for that as best as we can to try and duplicate the handling of the same gun with iron sights, not mounting in those infernally high European mounts that make a carry handle of the scope requiring the head to be held up like a giraffe.
I've used plenty of them in Europe and even there could not really see the need for them.
21 November 2010, 04:30
dpcdI fully agree; doubles don't need scopes, especially high mounted ones, but I couldn't help it. But it's like a fashion accessory that I can remove or not. Sort of like Barbies for men.